Using patient data for patients' benefit

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 358, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Banerjee, Amitava ^a   Mathew, David ^b   Rouane, Katherine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BEDFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 85030702928     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4413     Document Type: Editorial

References (15)

1. Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research. #datasaveslives. http://www.farrinstitute. org/public-engagement-involvement/datasaveslives
2. National Information Board and Department of Health. Personalised health and care 2020. 2014.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/personalised-health-and-care-2020
3. Velardo C, Shah SA, Gibson O, et al. EDGE COPD Team. Digital health system for personalised COPD long-term management. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017;358:19. doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0414-8 pmid:28219430.
4. Biswas R, Martin CM, Sturmberg J, et al. User-driven health care-answering multidimensional information needs in individual patients utilizing post-EBM approaches: a conceptual model. J Eval Clin Pract 2008;358:742-9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008. 00998.x pmid:19018905.
5. Department of Health. Making IT work: harnessing the power of health information technology to improve care in England. 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment-data/file/550866/Wachter-Review-Accessible.pdf
6. National Data Guardian for Health and Care. Review of data security, consent and opt-outs. 2016.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-data-security-consent-and-opt-outs
7. Information Commissioner's Office. Overview of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/data-protection-reform/overview-of-the-gdpr/
8. Latulippe K, Hamel C, Giroux D. Social health inequalities and ehealth: a literature review with qualitative synthesis of theoretical and empirical studies. J Med Internet Res 2017;358:e136. doi:10.2196/jmir.6731 pmid:28450271.
9. Davis S, Roudsari A, Courtney KL. Designing personal health record technology for shared decision making. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017;358:75-80.pmid:28186019.
10. Sheikh A, Sood HS, Bates DW. Leveraging health information technology to achieve the "triple aim" of healthcare reform. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015;358:849-56. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv022 pmid:25882032.
11. Medical Research Council UK. Maximising the value of UK population cohorts MRC strategic Review of the largest UK Population cohort studies. 2014. https://www.mrc.ac. uk/publications/browse/maximising-the-value-of-uk-population-cohorts/
12. Public Health Research Data Forum. Sharing research data to improve public health: full joint statement by funders of health research. 2010. https://wellcome.ac.uk/what-we-do/our-work/sharing-research-data-improve-public-health-full-joint-statement-funders-health
13. Olsen LA, Aisner D, McGinnis JM, eds. The learning healthcare system: workshop summary. The national academies collection: reports funded by National Institutes of Health. National Academies Press, 2007.
14. Ziebland S, Powell J, Briggs P, et al. Examining the role of patients' experiences as a resource for choice and decision-making in health care: a creative, interdisciplinary mixed-method study in digital health. Programme Grants for Applied Research 2016;4.pmid:27929620.
15. Santana MJ, Haverman L, Absolom K, et al. Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice. Qual Life Res 2015;358:1707-18. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0903-5 pmid:25589231.