Correction: What does expert opinion in guidelines mean? a meta-epidemiological study (Evidence-Based Medicine (2017) 22 (164-169) DOI: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110798);What does expert opinion in guidelines mean? a meta-epidemiological study

Evidence-Based Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 164-169

  Ponce, Oscar J ^a   Alvarez Villalobos, Neri ^a   Shah, Raj ^b   Mohammed, Khaled ^c   Morgan, Rebecca L ^d   Sultan, Shahnaz ^c   Falck Ytter, Yngve ^e   Prokop, Larry J ^a   Dahm, Philipp ^c   Mustafa, Reem A ^f   Murad, Mohammad H ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Epidemiology

Indexed keywords

CASE REPORT; CASE STUDY; HUMAN; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

EID: 85030633115     PISSN: 13565524     EISSN: 14736810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110798corr1     Document Type: Erratum

References (18)

1. Field M, Lohr K. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1990.
2. Institute of Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2011.
3. Ballesca MA, LaGuardia JC, Lee PC, et al. An electronic order set for acute myocardial infarction is associated with improved patient outcomes through better adherence to clinical practice guidelines. J Hosp Med 2014; 9: 155-61.
4. Oh SW, Lee HJ, Chin HJ, et al. Adherence to clinical practice guidelines and outcomes in diabetic patients. Int J Qual Health Care 2011; 23: 413-9.
5. Murad MH. Clinical practice guidelines: a primer on development and dissemination. Mayo Clin Proc 2017; 92: 423-33.
6. Hultcrantz M, Rind D, Akl EA, et al. The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2017; 87: 4-13.
7. Merriam-Webster. Definition of opinion. https://www.merriam-webster.com/.dictionary/.opinion (accessed 23 Jun 2017).
8. Murad MH, Wang Z. Guidelines for reporting metaepidemiological methodology research. Evid Based Med 2017; 22: 139-42.
9. Guyatt GH, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, et al. Guideline panels should seldom make good practice statements: guidance from the GRADE Working Group. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 80: 3-7.
10. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. rating the quality of evidence-indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 1303-10.
11. Wang AT, McCoy CP, Murad MH, et al. Association between industry affiliation and position on cardiovascular risk with rosiglitazone: cross sectional systematic review. BMJ 2010; 340: c1344.
12. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 401-6.
13. Eibling D, Fried M, Blitzer A, et al. Commentary on the role of expert opinion in developing evidence-based guidelines. Laryngoscope 2014; 124: 355-7.
14. Mustafa RA, Zimmerman D, Rioux JP, et al. Vascular access for intensive maintenance hemodialysis: a systematic review for a Canadian Society of Nephrology clinical practice guideline. Am J Kidney Dis 2013; 62: 112-31.
15. Nesrallah GE, Mustafa RA, MacRae J, et al. Canadian Society of Nephrology guidelines for the management of patients with ESRD treated with intensive hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2013; 62: 187-98.
16. A process for robust and transparent rating of study quality: phase 1 Rockville(MD) 2011.
17. Murad MH, Mustafa R, Morgan R, et al. Rating the quality of evidence is by necessity a matter of judgment. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 74: 237-8.
18. Guyatt GH, Schünemann HJ, Djulbegovic B, et al. Guideline panels should not GRADE good practice statements. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68: 597-600.