Webcams, TV shows and mobile phones: Empowering exhibitionism

Surveillance and Society

Volumn 2, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 199-215

  Koskela, Hille ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029708422     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adam, A. (2001) Cyberstalking: gender and computer ethics. In E. Green and A. Adam (eds.) Virtual Gender: Technology, Consumption and Identity. London: Routledge, 209–224.
2. Ainley, R. (1998) Watching the detectors: control and the Panopticon. In R. Ainley (ed.) New Frontiers of Space, Bodies and Gender. London: Routledge, 88–100.
3. Allen, M. (1994) ‘See you in the city!’ Perth’s Citiplace and the space of surveillance. In K. Gibson and S. Watson (eds.) Metropolis Now: Planning and the Urban in Contemporary Australia. Australia: Pluto Press, 137–147.
4. Bauman, Z. (2000) Social issues of law and order. British Journal of Criminology, 40: 205–221.
5. Burgin, V. (2002) Jenni’s room: exhibitionism and solitude. In T.Y. Levin, U. Frohne and P. Weibel (eds.) CTRL[SPACE]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother. Karlsruhe: ZKM Centre for Art and Media, 228–235.
6. Campanella, T.J. (2004) Webcameras and the telepresent landscape. In S. Graham (ed.) The Cybercities Reader. London: Routledge, 57–63.
7. Cheddie, J. (1999) From slaveship to mothership and beyond: thoughts on a digital diaspora. In Cutting Edge (eds.) Desire by Design: Body, Territories and New Technologies. London: I.B. Tauris, 163–174.
8. Curry, M.R. (1997) The digital individual and the private realm. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87: 681–699.
9. Davis, M. (1995) Beyond Blade Runner: urban control – the ecology of fear. Mediamatic.net: new media, art, culture and theory. http://www.mediamatic.net/cwolk/view/911
10. Ernst, W. (2002) Beyond the rhetoric of panopticism: surveillance as cybernetics. In T.Y. Levin, U. Frohne and P. Weibel (eds.) CTRL[SPACE]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother. Karlsruhe: ZKM Centre for Art and Media, 460–463.
11. Faith, K. (1994) Resistance: lessons from Foucault and feminism. In H.L. Radtke and H.J. Stam (eds.) Power/Gender: Social Relations in Theory and Practice. London: Sage, 36–66.
12. Featherstone, M. and R. Burrows (1995) Cultures of technological embodiment: an introduction. In M. Featherstone and R. Burrows (eds.) Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk. London: Sage, 1–19.
13. Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of a Prison. London: Penguin Books.
14. Graham, S. (1998) Spaces of surveillant simulation: new technologies, digital representations, and material geographies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 16: 483–504.
15. Green, S. (1999) A plague on the Panoptician: surveillance and power in the global information economy. Information, Communication and Society, 2: 26–44.
16. Groombridge, N. (2002) Crime control or crime culture TV? Surveillance and Society, 1: 30–36. http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles1/cctvculture.pdf
17. Hannah, M. (1997) Space and the structuring of disciplinary power: an interpretive review. Geografiska Annaler, 79B: 171–180.
18. ©_Meets_OncoMouse?. Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
19. Higgins, R., E. Rushhaija and A. Medhurst (1999). Technowhores. In Cutting Edge (eds.) Desire by Design: Body, Territories and New Technologies. London: I.B. Tauris, 111–122.
20. Hillier, J. (1996) The gaze in the city: video surveillance in Perth. Australian Geographical Studies, 34: 95–105.
21. Jimroglou, K.M. (2001) A camera with a view: JenniCAM, visual representations and cyborg subjectivity. In E. Green and A. Adam (eds.) Virtual Gender: Technology, Consumption and Identity. London: Routledge, 286–301.
22. Kopomaa, T. (2000) The City in Your Pocket: Birth of the Mobile Information Society. Helsinki: Gaudeamus. Korander, T. (2000) Turvallisuus rikollisuuden ja sen pelon vastakohtana. In P. Niemelä and A.R. Lahikainen (eds.) Inhimillinen turvallisuus. Tampere: Vastapaino, 177–216.
23. Koskela, H. (2000) ‘The gaze without eyes’: video surveillance and the changing nature of urban space. Progress in Human Geography, 24: 243–265.
24. Koskela, H. (2001) Joensuun torialueen kameravalvonnan vaikutus kaupunkilaisten turvallisuuteen. Joensuun kihlakunnan poliisilaitos, Joensuun keskustakehittämisyhdistys.
25. Koskela, H. (2002) Video surveillance, gender and the safety of public urban space: ‘Peeping Tom’ goes high tech? Urban Geogra phy, 23: 257–278.
26. Koskela, H. (2003) ‘Cam Era’ – the contemporary urban Panopticon. Surveillance and Society, 1: 292–313. http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles1(3)/camera.pdf
27. Koskela, H. and M. Tuominen (2003)”Kakspiippunen juttu” – tutkimus helsinkiläisten suhtautumisesta kameravalvontaan. Research Reports of the Helsinki Urban Facts 2003:3.
28. Lyon, D. (1998) The world wide web of surveillance: the Internet and off-world power-flows. Information, Communication and Society 1: 1–9.
29. Lyon, D. (2001) Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life. Buckingham: Open University Press.
30. Lyon, D. (2004) CCTV surveillance in the twenty-first century: global trends and the dialectic of control. A lecture held at the CCTV and Social Control conference, Sheffield, 8th January 2004.
31. Mann, S. (2002) ‘Reflectionism’ and ‘diffusionism’: new tactics for deconstructing the video surveillance superhighway. In T.Y. Levin, U. Frohne and P. Weibel (eds.) CTRL[SPACE]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother. Karlsruhe: ZKM Centre for Art and Media, 531–543.
32. Mann, S., J. Nolan and B. Wellman (2003) Sousveillance: inventing and using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance environments. Surveillance and Society, 1: 331–355. http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles1(3)/sousveillance.pdf
33. Mathiesen, T. (1997) The viewer society: Foucault’s ‘Panopticon’ revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1: 215–234.
34. Monahan, T. (2004) Counter-surveillance as political intervention? Paper presented at the CCTV and Social Control conference, Sheffield, 8th January 2004.
35. Norris, C. (2002) From personal to digital: CCTV, the Panopticon, and the technological mediation of suspicion and social control. In D. Lyon (ed.) Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination. London: Routledge, 249–281.
36. Nunes, M. (2001) Ephemeral cities: postmodern urbanism and the production of online space. In D. Holmes (ed.) Virtual Globalization: Virtual Spaces/Tourist Spaces. London: Routledge, 57–75.
37. Pinck, P. (2000) From sofa to the crime scene: Skycam, local news and the televisual city. In M. Balshaw and L. Kennedy (eds.) Urban Space and Representation. London: Pluto Press, 55–68.
38. Poster, M. (1995) The Second Media Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
39. Presdee, M. (2000) Cultural Criminology and the Carnival of Crime. London: Routledge.
40. Roberts, L.D. and M.R. Parks (2001) The social geography of gender-switching in virtual environments on the Internet. In E. Green and A. Adam (eds.) Virtual Gender: Technology, Consumption and Identity. London: Routledge, 265–285.
41. Schienke, E.W. and IAA (2002) On the outside looking out: an interview with the Institute for Applied Autonomy (IAA). Surveillance and Society, 1: 102–119. http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles1/iaa.pdf
42. Seppänen, J. (2002) Katseen voima. Kohti visuaalista lukutaitoa. Tampere: Vastapaino. Shade, L.R (1996) Is there free speech on the Net? Censorship in the global information inrfastructure. In R. Shields (ed.) Cultures of Internet: Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living Bodies. London: Sage, 11–32.
43. Sharp, J.P., P. Routledge, C. Philo and R. Paddison (2000, eds.) Entanglements of Power: Geographies of Domination/Resistance. London: Routledge.
44. Tabor, P. (2001) I am a videocam. In I.Borden, J.Kerr, J.Rendell and A. Pivaro (eds.) The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 122–137.
45. Terranova, T. (2001) Demonstrating the globe: virtual action in the network society. In D. Holmes (ed.) Virtual Globalization: Virtual Spaces/Tourist Spaces. London: Routledge, 95–113.
46. Virilio, P. (2002) The visual crash. In T.Y. Levin, U. Frohne and P. Weibel (eds.) CTRL[SPACE]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother. Karlsruhe: ZKM Centre for Art and Media, 108–113.
47. Wakeford, N. (1998) Urban culture for virtual bodies: comments on lesbian ‘identity’ and ‘community’ in San Francisco Bay Area cyberspace. In R. Ainley (ed.) New Frontiers of Space, Bodies and Gender. London: Routledge, 176–190.
48. Weibel, P. (2002) Pleasure and the panoptic principle. In T.Y. Levin, U. Frohne and P. Weibel (eds.) CTRL[SPACE]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother. Karlsruhe: ZKM Centre for Art and Media, 207–223.
49. Wertheim, M. (1997) The pearly gates of cyberspace. In N. Ellin (ed.) The Architecture of Fear. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 295–302.
50. Whitaker, R. (1999) The End of Privacy: How Total Surveillance is Becoming a Reality. New York: The New Press.
51. Zickmund, S. (1997) Approaching the radical other: the discursive culture of cyberhate. In S. Jones (ed.) Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety. London: Sage, 185–205.
52. Zizek, S. (2002) Big Brother, or, the triumph of the gaze over the eye. In T.Y. Levin, U. Frohne and P. Weibel (eds.) CTRL[SPACE]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother. Karlsruhe: ZKM Centre for Art and Media, 224–227.