Method for the determination of carbonyl compounds in E-cigarette aerosols

Journal of Chromatographic Science

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 142-148

  Flora, Jason W ^a   Wilkinson, Celeste T ^a   Wilkinson, James W ^a   Lipowicz, Peter J ^a   Skapars, James A ^a   Anderson, Adam ^a   Miller, John H ^a  

^a Altria Client Services   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSOL; ALDEHYDE;

AEROSOL; ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; DEVICES; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEAT; MASS FRAGMENTOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; THEORETICAL MODEL;

AEROSOLS; ALDEHYDES; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; HOT TEMPERATURE; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 85029668232     PISSN: 00219665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/bmw157     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Goniewicz, M.L., Knysak, J., Gawron, M., Kosmider, L., Sobczak, A., Kurek, J. III, et al.; Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes; Tobacco Control, (2014); 23: 133-139.
2. Uchiyama, S., Ohta, K., Inaba, Y., Kunugita, N.; Determination of carbonyl compounds generated from the e-cigarette using coupled silica cartridges impregnated with hydroquinone and 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine, followed by high-performance liquid chromatography; Analytical Science, (2013); 29: 1219-1222.
3. Kosmider, L., Sobczak, A., Fik, M., Knysak, J., Zaciera, M., Kurek, J., et al.; Carbonyl compounds in electronic cigarette vapors: effects of nicotine solvent and battery output voltage; Nicotine and Tobacco Research, (2014); 16: 1319-1326.
4. Bekki, K., Uchiyama, S., Ohta, K., Inaba, Y., Nakagome, H., Kunugita, N.; Carbonyl compounds generated from electronic cigarettes; International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, (2014); 11: 11192-11200.
5. Cheng, T.; Chemical evaluation of electronic cigarettes; Tobacco Control, (2014); 23(Suppl 2): ii11-ii17.
6. Tayyarah, R., Long, G.A.; Comparison of select analytes in aerosol from e-cigarettes with smoke from conventional cigarettes and with ambient air; Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, (2014); 70: 704-710.
7. Uchiyama, S., Inaba, Y., Kunugita, N.; Determination of acrolein and other carbonyls in cigarette smoke using coupled silica cartridges impregnated with hydroquinone and 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine; Journal of Chromatography A, (2010); 1217: 4383-4388.
8. Flora, J.W., Meruva, N., Huang, C.B., Wilkinson, C.T., Ballentine, R., Smith, D.C., et al.; Characterization of potential impurities and degradation products in electronic cigarette formulations and aerosols; Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, (2016); 74: 1-11. http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.11.009.
9. Gillman, I.G., Kistler, K.A., Stewart, E.W., Paolantonio, A.R.; Effect of variable power levels on the yield of total aerosol mass and formation of aldehydes in e-cigarette aerosols; Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, (2016). doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.12.019.
10. Geiss, O., Bianchi, I., Barrero-Moreno, J.; Correlation of volatile carbonyl yields emitted by e-cigarettes with the temperature of the heating coil and the perceived sensorial quality of the generated vapours; International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, (2016); 219: 268-277.
11. Jo, S.H., Kim, K.H.; Development of a sampling method for carbonyl compounds released due to the use of electronic cigarettes and quantitation of their conversion from liquid to aerosol; Journal of Chromatography A, (2016); 1429: 369-373.
12. Miller, J.H., Gardner, W.P., Gonzalez, R.R.; UHPLC separation with MS analysis for eight carbonyl compounds in mainstream tobacco smoke; Journal of Chromatographic Science, (2010); 48: 12-17.
13. CORESTA. (2014) CORESTA Recommended Method No 74. Determination of Selected Carbonyls in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke by HPLC. http://www.coresta.org/Recommended-Methods/CRM-74-update(July14).pdf (accessed December, 2015).
14. Counts, M.E., Morton, M.J., Laffoon, S.W., Cox, R.H., Lipowicz, P.J.; Smoke composition and predicting relationships for international commercial cigarettes smoked with three machine-smoking conditions; Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, (2005); 41: 185-227.
15. Uchiyama, S., Ando, M., Aoyagi, S.; Isomerization of aldehyde-2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone derivatives and validation of high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis; Journal of Chromatography A, (2003); 996: 95-102.
16. Grosjean, E., Green, P.G., Grosjean, D.; Liquid chromatography analysis of carbonyl (2,4-dinitrophenyl)hydrazones with detection by diode array ultraviolet spectroscopy and by atmospheric pressure negative chemical ionization mass spectrometry; Analytical Chemistry, (1999); 71: 1851-1861.
17. Herrington, J.S., Myers, C.; Electronic cigarette solutions and resultant aerosol profiles; Journal of Chromatography A, (2015); 1418: 192-199.
18. Wilkinson, C.T., Wilkinson, J., Miller, J.H., Flora, J.W.; Determination of gas-phase carbonyls in e-cigarette aerosol using a sorbent tube vs. impinger collection; Proceedings of CORESTA SSPT October 2015, Jeju Island, South Korea, (2015).
19. FDA. Harmful and potentially harmful constituents in tobacco products and tobacco smoke; established list; Federal Register, (2012); 77: 20034-20037.
20. FDA. (2012) Guidance for Industry. Reporting Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents in Tobacco Products and Tobacco Smoke Under Section 904(a)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulat oryInformation/UCM297828.pdf (accessed June, 2015).
21. Paine, J.B. III, Pithawalla, Y.B., Naworal, J.D., Thomas, J.; Carbohydrate pyrolysis mechanisms from isotopic labeling: Part 1: the pyrolysis of glycerin: discovery of competing fragmentation mechanisms affording acetaldehyde and formaldehyde and the implications for carbohydrate pyrolysis; Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, (2007); 80: 297-311.
22. Laino, T., Tuma, C., Curioni, A., Jochnowitz, E., Stolz, S.; A revisited picture of the mechanism of glycerol dehydration; Journal of Physical Chemistry A, (2011); 115: 3592-3595.
23. ISO. (2012) ISO Standard 3308, International Organization for Standardization. Routine Analytical Cigarette-Smoking Machine-Definitions and Standard Conditions. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
24. Health Canada. (1999) Test Method T-115. Determination of "Tar", Nicotine and Carbon Monoxide in Mainstream Tobacco Smoke. Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
25. Vansickel, A.R., Edmiston, J., Liang, Q., Duhon, C., Liu, J., Sarkar, M.; Characterization of electronic cigarette prototype puff topography in adult exclusive cigarette smokers and adult exclusive electronic cigarette users; Presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT), February 5-8, 2014, Seattle, WA POS3-65, (2014).
26. García-Alonso, S., Pérez-Pastor, R., Sevillano-Castaño, M.L.; Determination of glyoxal and methylglyoxal in atmospheric particulate matter by 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine derivatisation; Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, (2006); 88: 445-452.
27. ICH. (2005) International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Guideline Q2(R1): Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2 (R1). http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public-Web-Site/ICH-Products/Guideline s/Quality/Q2-R1/Step4/Q2-R1-Guideline.pdf (accessed June, 2015).
28. Wells Fargo Securities. (2014) Equity Research: Nielsen C-Store Data-ECig Sales Remain Strong. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Equity Research Department, Minneapolis, MN.