Assessment of logical consistency in OpenStreetMap based on the spatial similarity concept

Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography

Volumn 0, Issue 9783319142791, 2015, Pages 19-36

  Hashemi, Peyman ^a   Ali Abbaspour, Rahim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Logical consistency; OSM; Spatial similarity; Topological relations; Volunteered geographic information (VGI)

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; QUALITY ASSURANCE; TOPOLOGY;

AMOUNT OF INFORMATION; LOGICAL CONSISTENCY; MULTI-REPRESENTATIONS; NON-PROFESSIONAL USERS; SPATIAL SIMILARITY; TOPOLOGICAL RELATIONS; TOPOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS; VOLUNTEERED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION;

DATA INTEGRATION;

EID: 85029460250     PISSN: 18632246     EISSN: 18632351     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14280-7_2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Barron C, Neis P, Zipf A (2013) A comprehensive framework for intrinsic OpenStreetMap quality analysis. Trans GIS 43–48. doi:10.1111/tgis.12073
2. Bruns T, Egenhofer MJ (1996) Similarity of spatial scenes. In: Kraak J-M, Molenaar M (eds) Seventh international symposium on spatial data handling. Delft, The Netherlands, pp 173–184
3. Egenhofer MJ, Al-Taha KK (1992) Reasoning about gradual changes of topological relationships. Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space. Springer, Berlin, pp 196–219
4. Egenhofer MJ, Sharma J (1993) Topological relations between regions in R2 and Z2. In: Abel D, Ooi BC (eds) Advances in spatial databases–3rd international symposium on large spatial databases, SSD 93, Singapore, Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 316–336
5. Egenhofer MJ, Clementini E, Di Felice P (1994) Evaluating inconsistencies among multiple representations. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on spatial data handling, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp 901–920
6. Jokar Arsanjani J, Barron C, Bakillah M, Helbich M (2013) Assessing the Quality of OpenStreetMap contributors together with their contributions. Paper presented at the 16th AGILE international conference on geographic information science, Leuven, Belgium OSM full history dump. http://osm.personalwerk.de/full-history-extracts/. Accessed 20 Sept 2014
7. Girres JF, Touya G (2010) Quality assessment of the French OpenStreetMap dataset. Trans GIS 14 (4):435–459
8. Goodchild MF, Li L (2012) Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spat Stat 1:110–120. doi:10.1016/j.spasta.2012.03.002
9. Goyal RK, Egenhofer MJ (2001) Similarity of cardinal directions. In: Jensen CS, Schneider M, Seeger B, Tsotras VJ (eds) Advances in spatial and temporal databases SE-3. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2121, Springer, Berlin, pp 36–55
10. Haklay M (2010) How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Environ Plan 37(4):682–703
11. ISO 19157: 2013 Geographic information—data quality. ISO (International Organization of Standardization)
12. Kainz W (1995) Logical consistency. In: Guptill SC, Morrison JL (eds) Elements of spatial data quality, vol 202. Elsevier Science Ltd, Amsterdam, pp 109–137
13. Keßler C, de Groot RTA (2013) Trust as a proxy measure for the quality of volunteered geographic information in the case of OpenStreetMap. In: Geographic information science at the heart of Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp 21–37. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00615-4_2
14. Keßler C, Trame J, Kauppinen T (2011) Tracking editing processes in volunteered geographic information: the case of OpenStreetMap. In: Duckham M, Galton A, Worboys M (eds) Identifying objects, processes and events in spatio-temporally distributed data (IOPE), workshop at conference on spatial information theory, Belfast, USA KeepRight. http://keepright.at/. Accessed 20 Sept 2014
15. Li B, Fonseca F (2006) TDD: a comprehensive model for qualitative spatial similarity assessment. Spat Cogn Comput 6(1):31–62
16. Morrison JL (1995) Spatial data quality. In: Guptill SC, Morrison JL (eds) Elements of spatial data quality, vol 202. Elsevier Science Ltd, Amsterdam, pp 1–12
17. Neis P, Zielstra D, Zipf A (2011) The street network evolution of crowdsourced maps: OpenStreetMap in Germany 2007–2011. Future Internet 4(1):1–21. doi:10.3390/fi4010001 OpenStreetMap. http://openstreetmap.org. Accessed 20 Sept 2014
18. OpenStreetMap, full history dump. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Planet.osm/full. Accessed 20 Sept 2014
19. OpenStreetMap quality assurance. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance. Accessed 20 Sept 2014
20. OSM Statistics. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Statistics. Accessed 20 Sept 2014
21. Sui D, Elwood S, Goodchild MF (2013) Prospects for VGI research and the emerging fourth paradigm. In: Elwood S, Goodchild MF, Sui D (eds) Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 361–375. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2
22. Tversky A (1977) Features of similarity. Psychol Rev 84(4):327–352
23. Wang J, Mülligann C, Schwering A (2011) An empirical study on relevant aspects for sketch map alignment. In: Advancing geoinformation science for a changing world. Springer, Berlin, pp 497–518
24. Worboys MF, Duckham M (2004) GIS: a computing perspective. CRC Press, Florida
25. Zielstra D, Zipf A (2010) A comparative study of proprietary geodata and volunteered geographic information for Germany. In: 13th AGILE international conference on geographic information science, Guimarães, Portugal