Global developments in priority setting in health

International Journal of Health Policy and Management

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 127-128

  Baltussen, Rob ^a   Mitton, Craig ^b   Danis, Marion ^c   Williams, Iestyn ^d   Gold, Marthe ^e,f  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^e NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Legitimacy; Priority setting; Stakeholder participation

Indexed keywords

GLOBAL HEALTH; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN;

GLOBAL HEALTH; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HEALTH RESOURCES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS;

EID: 85029210347     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23225939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.10     Document Type: Editorial

References (13)

1. Chhatwal J, Kanwal F, Roberts MS, Dunn MA. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of hepatitis C virus treatment with sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(6):397-406. doi:10.7326/M14-1336
2. Ottersen T, Norheim OF, Chitah BM, et al. Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage. Bull World Health Organiz. 2014;92(6):389.
3. World Health Organisation (WHO). 2015 Global Survey on Health Technology Assessment by National Authorities. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js22174en/. Published 2015.
4. Daniels N, Charvel S, Gelpi AH, Porteny T, Urrutia J. Role of the courts in the progressive realization of the right to health: between the threat and the promise of judicialization in Mexico. Health Sys Ref. 2015;1(3):229-234.
5. Williams I. Institutions, cost-effectiveness analysis and healthcare rationing: the example of healthcare coverage in the English National Health Service. Policy Polit. 2013;41(2):223-239.
6. International Decision Support Initiative (iDSI) website. http://www.idsihealth.org/. Accessed September 16, 2016.
7. European Network on Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) website. http://www.eunethta.net/. Accessed September 16, 2016.
8. Baltussen R, Jansen MP, Mikkelsen E, et al. Priority setting for universal health coverage: we need evidence-informed deliberative processes, not just more evidence on cost-effectiveness. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(11):615-618. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.83
9. Daniels N. Accountability for reasonableness. BMJ. 2000; 321(7272): 1300- 1301.
10. Baroe K, Baltussen R. Legitimate healthcare limit setting in a real-world setting: integrating accountability for reasonableness and multi-criteria decision analysis. Public Health Ethics. 2014;7(2):98-111. doi:10.1093/phe/phu006
11. Gibson J, Mitton C, Martin D, Donaldson C, Singer P. Ethics and economics: does programme budgeting and marginal analysis contribute to fair priority setting? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006;11(1):32-37. doi:10.1258/135581906775094280
12. Glassman A, Chalkidou K. Priority-Setting in Health: Building Institutions for Smarter Public Spending, 2014. http://www. cgdev.org/publication/priority-setting-health-building-institutions-smarter-public-spending.
13. Hauck K, Smith PC. The Politics of Priority Setting in Health: A Political Economy Perspective. Ceneter for Global Development Working Paper 414, 2015. http://www.cgdev.org/publication/politics-priority-setting-health-political-economy-perspective-working-paper-414.