The simple but not-too-simple valuation of ecosystem services: basic principles and an illustrative example

Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 96-106

  Simpson, R David ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

diminishing returns; Ecosystem services; exponential function; marginal value; opportunity cost; removal rate; riparian buffers

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029169421     PISSN: 21606544     EISSN: 21606552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21606544.2016.1184594     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Armsworth, P.R., K.M.A., Chan, G.C., Daily, P.R., Ehrlich, C., Kremen, M.A., Sanjayan, and T.R., Ricketts. 2007. “Ecosystem Service Science and the Way Forward for Conservation.” Conservation Biology 21 (6): 1383–1384.
2. Baker, M.E., D.E., Weller, and T.E., Jordan. 2007. “Effects of Stream Map Resolution on Measures of Riparian Buffer Distribution and Nutrient Retention Potential.” Landscape Ecology 22: 973–992.
3. Bockstael, N., A.M., Freeman, R., Kopp, P., Portney, and V.K., Smith. 2000. “On Measuring Economic Values for Nature.” Environmental Science and Technology 34: 1384–1389.
4. CBC (Chesapeake Bay Commission). 2012. Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake Bay: An Economic Study. Accessed 15 May 2015. http://www.chesbay.us/Publications/nutrient-trading-2012.pdf.
5. CBF (Chesapeake Bay Foundation). 2014. “Economic Benefits of Cleaning up the Chesapeake: A Valuation of the Natural Benefits Gained by Implementing the Chesapeake Clean Water Blueprint.” Accessed 14 May 2015. http://www.cbf.org/document.doc?id=2258.
6. Costanza, R., R., dArge, R., de Groot, S., Farber, M., Grasso, B., Hannon, K., Limburg, et al. 1997. “The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital.” Nature 387: 253–260.
7. Costanza, R.R., R., de Groot, P., Sutton, S., van der Ploeg, S.J., Anderson, I., Kubiszewski, S., Farber, and R.K., Turner. 2014. “Changes in the Global Value of Ecosystem Services.” Global Environmental Change 26: 152–158.
8. Escobedo, F., and N., Timilsina. 2012. Final Report: Stewardship Ecosystem Services Project. Accessed 28 January 2016. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida. http://sfrc.ufl.edu/cfeor/docs/EcosystemServices.FloridaStewardshipReport.Jul2012.pdf.
9. Fisher, B., R.K., Turner, and P., Morling. 2009. “Defining and Classifying Ecosystem Services for Decision Making.” Ecological Economics 68: 643–653.
10. Guerry, A.D., S., Polasky, J., Lubchenco, R., Chaplin-Kramer, G.C., Daily, R., Griffin, M., Ruckelshaus, et al. 2015. “Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services Informing Decisions: From Promise to Practice.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (US) 112 (24): 7348–7355.
11. Johnston, R.J., and R.S., Rosenberger. 2010. “Methods, Trends and Controversies in Contemporary Benefit Transfer.” Journal of Economic Surveys 24: 479–510.
12. Johnston, R.J., and L.M., Wainger. 2015. “Benefit Transfer for Ecosystem Service Valuation: An Introduction to Theory and Methods.” In Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners, edited by R.J., Johnston, J., Rolfe, R., Rosenberger, and R., Brouwer, 237–273. Amsterdam: Springer.
13. Jones, C., E., Branosky, M., Selman, and M., Perez. 2010. How Nutrient Trading Could Help Restore the Chesapeake Bay. Accessed 28 January 2016. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/how_nutrient_trading_could_help_restore_the_chesapeake_bay.pdf.
14. King, D., 1998. “The Dollar Value of Wetlands: Trap Set, Bait Taken, Don't Swallow.” National Wetlands Newsletter 20: 7–11.
15. Kocian, M., A., Fletcher, G., Schundler, D., Batker, A., Schwartz, and T., Briceno. 2015. The Trillion Dollar Asset: The Economic Value of the Long Island Sound basin. Tacoma, WA: Earth Economics.
16. Lindhjem, H., and S., Navrud. 2008. “How Reliable are Meta-Analyses for International Benefit Transfers?” Ecological Economics 66: 425–435.
17. Liu, S., R., Costanza, A., Troy, J., D'Aagostino, and W., Mates. 2010. “Valuing New Jersey's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital: A Spatial Explicit Benefit Transfer Approach.” Journal of Environmental Management 45 (6): 1271–1285.
18. Mander, Ü., 2008. “Riparian Zone Management and Restoration.” In Encyclopedia of Ecology, edited by S.E., Jørgensen, and B., Fath, 3044–3061. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
19. Mayer, P.M., S.K., Reynolds, Jr., M.D., McCutcheon, and T.J., Canfield. 2007. “Meta-Analysis of Nitrogen Removal in Riparian Buffers.” Journal of Environmental Quality 36: 1172–1180.
20. Natural Capital Project, Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST). 2015. Accessed 14 May 2015. http://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/InVEST.html.
21. Pearce, D.W., 1998. “Auditing the Earth.” Environment 23: 25–28.
22. Plummer, M.L., 2009. “Assessing Benefit Transfer for the Valuation of Ecosystem Services.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 38–45.
23. Polasky, S., and H., Tallis. 2009. “Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural-Resource Management.” The Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology 1162: 265–283.
24. Ribaudo, M., J., Savage, and M.P., Aillery. 2014. “An Economic Assessment of Policy Options to Reduce Agricultural Pollutants in the Chesapeake Bay.” Economic Research Report 171880. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
25. Ricketts, T.H., G.C., Daily, P.R., Ehrlich, and C.D., Michener. 2004. “Economic Value of Tropical Forest to Coffee Production.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 (34): 12579–12582.
26. Rupprecht, R., C., Kilgore, and R., Gunther. 2009. “Riparian and Wetland Buffers for Water Quality Protection: A Review of Current Literature.” Stormwater: The Journal for Surface Water Quality Professionals 10 (8): 46–51.
27. Simpson, R.D., R.A., Sedjo, and J.W., Reid. 1996. “Valuing Biodiversity for Use in New Product Research.” Journal of Political Economy 104: 163–185.
28. Simpson, H., E., Taylor, Y., Li, and B., Barber. 2013. “Texas Statewide Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Services: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Regulating and Cultural Services Provided by Texas Forests.” Accessed 28 January 2016. Texas A&M Forest Service. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. http://texasforestservice.tamu.edu/uploadedFiles/TFSMain/Data_and_Analysis/Contact_Us(3)/Ecosystem%20Services%20-%20TX%20Statewide%20Assessment.pdf.
29. Sweeney, B.W., and J.D., Newbold. 2014. “Streamside Forest Buffer Width Needed to Protect Stream Water Quality, Habitat, and Organisms: A Literature Review.” JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 50: 560–584.
30. TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and biodiversity). 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. edited by Pushpam, Kumar. London and Washington: Earthscan.
31. United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). 2015. “Land Values: 2015 Summary.” Accessed 28 January 2016. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/AgriLandVa/AgriLandVa-08-05-2015.pdf.
32. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2010. Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. Accessed 5 April 2016. https://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwAN/EE-0568-50.pdf/$file/EE-0568-50.pdf.
33. Vidon, P.G.F., and A.R., Hill. 2004. “Landscape Controls on Nitrate Removal in Stream Riparian Zones.” Water Resources Research 40: W03201. doi:10.1029/2003WR002473.
34. Vincent, J.R., I., Ahmad, N., Adnan, T., Burwell, S., Pattanayak, J.S., Tan-Soo, and K., Thomas. 2015. “Valuing Water Purification by Forests: An Analysis of Malaysian Panel Data.” Environmental and Resource Economics 64 (1): 59–80.
35. Weissteiner, C.J., F., Bouraoui, and A., Aloe. 2013. “Reduction of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loads to European Rivers by Riparian Buffer Zones.” Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems. http://www.kmae-journal.org/articles/kmae/abs/2013/01/kmae120083/kmae120083.html
36. Weller, D.E., M.E., Baker, and T.E., Jordan. 2011. “Effects of Riparian Buffers on Nitrate Concentrations in Watershed Discharges: New Models and Management Implications.” Ecological Applications 21 (5): 1679–1695.