Analysis of fifteen years of the National Effective Teaching Institute

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Felder, Richard ^a   Brent, Rebecca ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Education Designs Inc

Author keywords

Faculty Development; National Effective Teaching Institute; NETI

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING EDUCATION; SURVEYS;

EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH; EFFECTIVE TEACHING; ENGINEERING FACULTY DEVELOPMENT; FACULTY DEVELOPMENT; NETI; TEACHING AND LEARNING; TEACHING PRACTICES; TEACHING WORKSHOPS;

TEACHING;

EID: 85029131592     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Van Note Chism, N., & Szabó, B.S. (1997). How faculty development programs evaluate their services. J. Staff, Prog., & Org. Dev., 15(2), 55-62.
2. D'Eon, M., Sadownik, L., Harrison, A., & Nation, J. (2008). Using self-assessments to detect workshop success: Do they work? Am. J. Evaluation, 29(1), 92-98.
3. Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
4. Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L.S. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change, 31(5), 10-15.
5. Sue, V.M., & Ritter, L.A. (2007). Conducting online surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2007.
6. th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
7. Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
8. Stice, J.E. (1976). A first step toward improved teaching. Engr. Education, 66(5), 394-398.
9. Lochhead, J. and Whimbey, A. (1987). Teaching analytical reasoning through thinking aloud pair problem solving, in J.E. Stice, ed., Developing critical thinking and problem-solving abilities, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 30, pp. 73-92. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Boice, R. (1992). The new faculty member. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Felder, R.M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. J. Engr. Education, 94(1), 57-72. < www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ Papers/Understanding-Differences.pdf>.
12. Hartley, J., & Davies, I.K. (1976). Preinstructional strategies: The role of pretests, behavioral objectives, overviews, and advance organizers. Rev. Educ. Res., 46(2), 239-265.
13. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. J. Engr. Education, 93(3), 223-231.
14. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Stanne, M.E. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Cooperative Learning Center. .
15. Felder, R.M., & Brent, R. (2008). Student ratings of teaching: Myths, facts, and good practices. Chem. Engr. Education, 42(1), 33-34. < www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Columns/StudentRatings.pdf>.
16. th ed.). Florence, KY: Cengage Learning.
17. Felder, R.M., & Brent, R. (2005). Death by PowerPoint. Chem. Engr. Education, 39(1), 28-29. < www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Columns/ PowerPoint.pdf>.
18. Stice, J.E. (1979). Grades and test scores: Do they predict adult achievement? Engr. Education, 69(5), 390-393.
19. Cohen, P.A. (1984). College grades and adult achievement: A research synthesis. Res. in Higher Ed., 20(3), 281-293.
20. Samson, G.E., Graue, M.E., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H.J. (1984). Academic and occupational performance: A quantitative synthesis. Am. Educ. Res. Journal, 21(2), 311-321.
21. Wlodkowski, R.J. (1999). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A guide to improving instruction and increasing learner achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.