Liberal education for the engineer of 2020: Are administrators on board?

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Harper, Betty ^a   Lattuca, Lisa ^a   Yin, Alexander ^a   Terenzini, Patrick ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; EDUCATION; ENGINEERS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCES; ENGINEERING EDUCATORS; ENGINEERING LEADERSHIP; ENGINEERING SCHOOLS; HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCE; STRATIFIED RANDOM SAMPLE; UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING; UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING PROGRAMS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 85029122290     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
2. National Academy of Engineering. (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
3. American Society for Engineering Education. (1994). The Green report: Engineering education for a changing world. Joint project report of the Engineering Deans Council and the Corporate Roundtable of the ASEE. Retrieved November 14, 2009 from http://www.asee.org/resources/beyond/greenReport.cfm.
4. ABET. Engineering criteria 2000. Baltimore, MD: Author.
5. National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine. (2007). Rising Above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
6. st Century Engineer: A proposal for Engineering Education Reform. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers Press.
7. Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A. & Sullivan, W. M. (2008) Educating Engineers: Designing the Future of the Field. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Duderstadt, J. J. (2009). Engineering for a changing world: A roadmap to the future of engineering practice, research, and education. Ann Arbor, MI: The Millennium Project.
9. Reuben, J. A. (1996). The making of the modern university: Intellectual transformation and the marginalization of morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Rudolph, F. (1977). Curriculum: A history of the American undergraduate course of study since 1636. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
11. st century: Social, political, and economic challenges (pp. 38-69). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Rothblatt, S. (1988). General education on the American campus: A historical introduction in brief. In I. Westbury and A. C. Purves (Eds.), Cultural literacy and the idea of general education: Eighty-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 9-28). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Conrad, C. F., & Wyer, J. C. (1980). Liberal education in transition (ERIC Research Report No. 3.) Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
14. Hutchins, R. M. (1936). The higher learning in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Ehrlich, T. (1997). Dewey versus Hutchins: The next round. In R. Orrill (Ed.), Education and democracy (pp. 225-262). New York: The College Board.
16. The Harvard Committee on the Objectives of a General Education in a Free Society (1945). General education in a free society: Report of the Harvard Committee. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2007). College learning for the new global century: A report from the National Leadership Council for Liberal Education. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
18. Stark, J. S. and Lowther, M.A. (1988). Strengthening the ties that bind: Integrating undergraduate liberal and professional education. Ann Arbor: Regents of the University of Michigan.
19. Shulman, L. S. (1997). Professing the Liberal Arts. In R. Orrill (Ed.), Education and democracy: Re-imagining liberal learning in America. New York: The College Entrance Examination Board.
20. American Society for Engineering Education. (2009). Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education : Ensuring U.S. engineering has the right people with the right talent for a global society (2009). Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
21. Prototype to production (n.d.). Retrieved November 14, 2009 from http://www.ed.psu.edu/educ/e2020/p2p.
22. E2020 survey instruments (n.d.). Retrieved November 14, 2009 from http://www.ed.psu.edu/educ/e2020/surveys-1.
23. Prototyping the engineer of 2020. (n.d.). Retrieved November 14, 2009 from http://www.ed.psu.edu/educ/e2020/p360.
24. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
25. National Center for Educations Statistics, (2004). 2005 Carnegie Classification; IPEDS Institutional Characteristics and Fall Enrollment.
26. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
27. Prawat, R. (1992). Teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 100 (3), 354-395.
28. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers' approaches to teaching. Higher Education, 32(1), 77-87.