Research, collaboration and interconnected outreach for underrepresented groups: Success from RET and REU collaborations

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Ragusa, Gisele ^a   Cocozza, Joseph ^a   Sabogal, Diana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Engineering educational outreach; Teacher efficacy; Teachers; Underrepresented groups

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; EDUCATION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; PERSONNEL TRAINING; PIPELINES; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATIONS; RESEARCH EXPERIENCE FOR TEACHERS; RESEARCH EXPERIENCE FOR UNDERGRADUATES; TEACHER EFFICACY; TEACHERS; UNDER-REPRESENTED GROUPS; UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING;

STEM (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING AND MATHEMATICS);

EID: 85029114086     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Anderson, L., and Krathwohl, D. Eds. 2000, "A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives."Boston, MA: Longman.
2. Arreola, R., M. Theall, and L. Aleamoni, 2003, "Beyond Scholarship: Recognizing the Multiple Roles of the Professoriate,"Presented at the 2003 American Educational Research Association convention. Available on line at http://www.cedanet.com/meta/Beynd%20Scholarship.pdf, Accessed April 19, 2005.
3. Bloom, B. S. 1984. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Pearson Education.
4. Cobern, W. 1993, Contextual constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 51-69). Washington, DC: AAAS.
5. Duderstadt, J. J., 2008, "Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education,"the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.
6. Gandara, P., J. Maxwell-Jolly, and A. Driscoll, 2005, "A survey of California teachers' challenges, experiences, and professional development needs."Santa Cruz, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
7. Heron, J., 2000, "Co-operative inquiry: research with rather than on people,"in P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds.), Handbook of Action Research, London: Sage.
8. Jensen, E., 2000, Brain-Based Learning. San Diego: Brain Store Incorporated.
9. NAE, 2004, "The Engineer of 2020,"National Academy of Engineering, The National Academy Press, Washington DC.
10. NAE, 2005, "Educating the Engineer of 2020,"National Academy of Engineering, The National Academy Press, Washington DC.
11. NSB (National Science Board), 2003, "The Science and Engineering Workforce: Realizing America's Potentials,"Report 03-69, Arlington, VA, National Science Foundation, Available online at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/ documents/2003/nsb0369/nsb0369.pdf, Accessed July 8, 2005.
12. Tonso, K.L. 2006. "Teams that Work: Campus Culture, Engineering Identity, and Social Interaction."Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 101.1. 25-37.
13. Von Secker, C. 2004, Science Achievement in Social Contexts: Analysis From National Assessment of Educational Progress. Journal of Educational Research. 98(2). 67-78.
14. Wankat, P. C., R. M. Felder, K. A. Smith and F. S. Oreowicz, 2002, "The Engineering Approach to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,"pp. 217-237 in Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Exploring Common Ground, M. T. Huber and S. Morreales, eds., Washington, D.C., American Association for Higher Education, Available online at http://www.ncsu.edu/fielder̃public/papers/Scholarship-chapter.pdf, Accessed July 8, 2005.
15. Williams, R., 2003, "Education for the Profession Formerly Known as Engineering,"The Chronicle of higher Education, Vol. 49, No. 20, p. B12
16. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17. Brooks, J.,& Brooks, M. (1993). The case for a constructivist classroom. Alexandra, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
18. Bybee, R. (2002). Learning science and the science of learning. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
19. Clark, R. E. & Estes, F. (2002) Turning Research Into Results: A Guide to Selecting the Right Performance Solutions. Atlanta, GA.: CEP Press.
20. Champion, R. (2002) Taking Measure: Choose the right data for the job. Journal of Staff Development, 23(3).
21. Cobern, W. (1993). Contextual constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of
22. constructivism in science education (pp. 51-69). Washington, DC: AAAS.
23. Crowther, D.T., Vilá, J.S., & Fathman, A.K. (2006). Learners, programs, and teaching
24. Practices. In A.K. Fathman & D.T. Crowther (Eds.), Science for English language learners: K-12 classroom strategies (pp. 9-21). National Science Teachers Association Press.
25. Dobb, F. (2004). Essential elements of effective science instruction for English learners, 2nd edition. California Science Project: Los Angeles, CA.
26. Gandara, P., Maxwell-Jolly, J., & Driscoll, A. (2005). A survey of California teachers' challenges, experiences, and professional development needs. Santa Cruz, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
27. Gibbons, B. A. (2003). Supporting elementary science education for English learners: A
28. constructivist evaluation instrument. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(6), 371-380.
29. Kirpatrick, D.L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
30. Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 491-530.
31. Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1996). Literacy skills in science performance among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Science Education, 80(6), 651-671.
32. Moll, L. C. (1990).Vygotsky and Education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34. National Center for Educational Statistics. (1999). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
35. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine (1997) Advisor, Teacher, Role Model and Friend: On Being a Mentor to Students in Science and Engineering. NAE, NAS, IM.
36. Ragusa, G. and Cocozza, J. (2008) Engineering Outreach: Connecting Biomimetic Research to Urban K-12 Classrooms. Conference Proceedings at the Annual Meeting American Society of Engineering Educators. Pittsburgh. June 2008.
37. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: University Press.
38. Stigler, J. (2006) Lesson Study: Principles and Practices. Issues in Teacher Education. 97 (3), 43-61.
39. Von Secker, C. (2004). Science achievement in social contexts: Analysis from National Assessment of Educational Progress. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(2), 67-78.
40. Wenger, (1997) Communities of Practice. NY: Teacher's College Press 104-132.