International publication trends originating from anaesthetic departments from 2001 to 2015

Anaesthesia

Volumn 72, Issue 10, 2017, Pages 1243-1250

  Ausserer, J ^a   Miller, C ^b   Putzer, G ^a   Pehbock D ^a   Hamm, P ^a   Wenzel, V ^c   Paal, P ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik   (Germany)

^c Medical Campus Bodensee ^*  (Germany)

^d PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^e QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

anaesthesiology; developed countries; developing countries; publications; research

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIOLOGY; CANADA; CHINA; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; GERMANY; HUMAN; INDIA; JAPAN; MEDLINE; PUBLICATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WRITING; BIBLIOMETRICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLISHING; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; BIBLIOMETRICS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING;

EID: 85029093306     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.14016     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung. G-20. 2016. http://www.g20.org/Webs/G20/DE/G20/g20_node.html (accessed 01/08/2016).
2. Thomson Reuters. Web of Science. 2016. https://apps.webofknowledge.com (accessed 01/08/2016).
3. International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook Database. 2016. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/01/weodata/index.aspx (accessed 01/08/2016).
4. World_Bank. Country and Lending Groups. 2016. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups (accessed 01/08/2016).
5. Pandit JJ. Measuring academic productivity: don't drop your ‘h's!. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 861–4.
6. Bould MD, Boet S, Riem N, Kasanda C, Sossou A, Bruppacher HR. National representation in the anaesthesia literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited anaesthesia journals. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 799–804.
7. Putzer G, Ausserer J, Wenzel V, et al. [Publication performances of university clinics for anesthesiology: Germany, Austria and Switzerland from 2001 to 2010]. Anaesthesist 2014; 63: 287–93.
8. Yentis SM. Research not research. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 871–4.
9. Figueredo E, Sanchez Perales G, Munoz Blanco F. International publishing in anaesthesia – how do different countries contribute? Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2003; 47: 378–82.
10. Swaminathan M, Phillips-Bute BG, Grichnik KP. A bibliometric analysis of global clinical research by anesthesia departments. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2007; 105: 1741–6.
11. Pandit JJ. The national strategy for academic anaesthesia. A personal view on its implications for our specialty. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006; 96: 411–4.
12. Feneck RO, Natarajan N, Sebastian R, Naughton C. Decline in research publications from the United Kingdom in anaesthesia journals from 1997 to 2006. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 270–5.
13. Pandit JJ. Anaesthetic research in the United Kingdom: publishing or perishing? Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 225–7.
14. Hausen A, Reibnegger G, Wachter H. Geography of medical publication. Lancet 1993; 341: 634.
15. Skram U, Larsen B, Ingwersen P, Viby-Mogensen J. Scandinavian research in anaesthesiology 1981–2000: visibility and impact in EU and world context. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2004; 48: 1006–13.
16. Klein AA, Pozniak A, Pandit JJ. Salami slicing or living off the fat? Justifying multiple publications from a single HIV dataset. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 195–8.
17. Carlisle JB. Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 944–52.
18. Loadsman JA, McCulloch TJ. Widening the search for suspect data - is the flood of retractions about to become a tsunami? Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 931–5.
19. Carlisle JB, Dexter F, Pandit JJ, Shafer SL, Yentis SM. Calculating the probability of random sampling for continuous variables in submitted or published randomised controlled trials. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 848–58.
20. Miller DR. Probability screening in manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals–an effective tool or a statistical quagmire? Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 765–8.
21. Pagel PS, Hudetz JA. An analysis of scholarly productivity in United States academic anaesthesiologists by citation bibliometrics. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 873–8.
22. Pandit JJ. Future opportunities and challenges in academic anesthesia in the United Kingdom: a model for maintaining the scientific edge. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 2010; 23: 159–66.