The quality of solutions to open-ended problem solving activities and its relation to first-year student team effectiveness

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Moore, Tamara ^a   Diefes Dux, Heidi ^a,b,c   Imbrie, P K ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Purdue University ^*

^c Teaching Academy   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

ENGINEERING GRADUATES; MODEL ELICITING ACTIVITIES (MEA); OPEN ENDED PROBLEM SOLVING ACTIVITIES;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 85029084378     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. ABET (2002). Engineering Criteria 2002-2003. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, http://www.abet.org/criteria.html.
2. Imbrie, P.K., Maller, S.J., and Immekus, J.C., "Assessing Team Effectiveness," Proceedings from the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR, 2005.
3. Guzzo, R. A. (1986). "Group Decision Making and Group Effectiveness." In Goodman, P. S. (Ed.). Designing Effective WorkGroups, 34-71. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4. Guzzo, R. A., Campbell, R. J. & Shea, G. P. (1993). "Potency in groups: Articulating a construct." British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 87-106.
5. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Barak, M., & Maymon, T. (1998). "Aspects of teamwork observed in a technological task in junior high schools." Journal of Technology Education, 9(2), 4-18.
7. Lesh, R. A., & Doerr, H. (Eds.). (2003). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Lesh, R. A., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591-645). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Diefes, H.A., Moore, T., Zawojewski, J., Imbrie, P.K., and Follman, D., "A Framework for Posing Open-Ended Engineering Problems: Model-Eliciting Activities," Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA., 2004.
10. National Research Council. (1995). Engineering education: Designing an adaptive system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (2003). Criteria for accrediting programs in engineering. Baltimore, MA: ABET, Inc.
12. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative Assessment: Designing Assessment to Inform and Improve Student Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Moore, T. and Diefes, H.A., "Developing Model-Eliciting Activities for Undergraduate Students Based on Advanced Engineering Content," Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA., 2004.
14. Zawojewski, J., Lesh, R., and English, L., "A Models and Modeling Perspective on the Role of Small Group Learning Activities," Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003.
15. Smith, K. A., Teamwork and Project Management, New York, N. Y.: McGraw-Hill. BEST Series, 2004.
16. Franzblau, A. (1958). A Primer of Statistics for Non-Statisticians. Harcourt, Brace & World.