Technology Assisted Science, Engineering and Mathematics (TASEM) education at all levels using K-Ph.D. concept

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Aslam, Dean ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029073590     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1990; Bartel, Lichtenberg, & Vaughan, 1992; Lipman, 1991; National Research Council, 1996).
2. Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Patrick, H., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Teaching for understanding. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 819-878). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education.New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. CTGV. (1992). The jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 291-315.
5. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 313-350.
6. Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design-based modeling approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 429-449.
7. Songer, N.B. (1996). Exploring learning opportunities in coordinated networkenhanced classrooms: A case of kids as global scientists. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 297-328.
8. D. Fortus, R.C. Dershimer, J. Krajcik, R.W. Marx and R. Mamlok-Naaman, design based science and student learning, J. Research Sci. Teaching, 41, 1081-1110 (2004).
9. Roberts, P. (1995). The place of design in technology education. In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education (pp. 27-38). UNESCO.
10. Baynes, K. (1994). Designerly play. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University of Technology.
11. Simon, H.A. (1999). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Bucciarelli, L.L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Davis, M., Hawley, P., McMullan, B., & Spilka, G. (1997). Design as a catalyst for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
14. ITEA. (2002). Standards for technological literacy. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
15. NRC. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. NRC. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Penner, D.E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design-based modeling approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 429-449.
17. Chiapetta, E.L., Koballa, Jr., T.R., & Collette, A.T. (2002). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (5th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. Kolodner, J.L. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
19. Kolodner, J.L., Crismond, D., Gray, J., Holbrook, J.K., & Puntambekar, S. (1998). Learning by design from theory to practice. Presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Georgia Tech University, Atlanta GA.
20. Barrows, H.S. (1985). How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years. New York: Springer.
21. Azuma R. A Survey of Augmented Reality. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 355-385, 1997.
22. Osberg K. Spatial Cognition in the Virtual Environ., Technical R-97-18. Seattle: Human Interface Technol. Lab, 1997.
23. Rizzo AA, Buckwalter JG, Neumann U, Kesselman C, Thiebaux M, Larson P, and van Rooyen A. The Virtual Reality Mental Rotation Spatial Skills Project. In CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1(2), pp. 113-120, 1998.
24. Pantelidis, V. S. Reasons to Use Virtual Reality in Education, VR in the Schools 1(1), 1995. URL: http://www.soe.ecu.edu/vr/reas.html (Revised 2000).
25. Roussos, M., Johnson, A., Moher, T., Leigh, J., Vasilakis, C., and Barnes, C. Learning and Building Together in an Immersive Virtual World. PRESENCE 8(3), pp. 247-263, MIT Press, June 1999.
26. Winn, W. A Conceptual Basis for Educational Applications of Virtual Reality, Technical Report TR 93-9: http://www.hitl.washington.edu/ publications/r-93-9/, 1993.
27. Zagoranski, S. and Divjak, S., Use of augmented reality in education, EUROCON 2003, 2, 339-342.
28. D.M. Aslam, "Micro- and Nano- Technologies in K through Ph.D. Education and Research", Keynote, Second World Congress Biomimetics, Artificial Muscles and Nano-Bio (Nano-Bio 2004) Albuquerque, New Mexico, December 6-8, 2004.
29. D.M. Aslam, "Small Tech Education", Keynote, High Desert MNT Regional Workshop, TVI Workforce Training Center - Albuquerque, NM, October 12-13, 2004.
30. S. Wolf, "Microchip Manufacturing", Lattice Press, 2004.
31. H. Liu et al., "Characterization of the Ultrathin Vertical Channel CMOS Technology", IEEE Trans. Electron Dev., 51, 2004
32. Yu et al., "FinFET Scaling to 10nm Gate Length", IEEE 2004.