Music, analogy, and metaphor

The Routledge Companion to Music Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 501-512

  Zbikowski, Lawrence M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029070740     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315194738     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Eitan, Z., & Granot, R. Y. (2006). How music moves: Musical parameters and listeners’ images of motion. Music Perception, 23 (3), 221-247.
2. Gentner, D., Bowdle, B. F., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 199-253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73 (4), 971-995.
4. Zbikowski, L. M.(2008). Metaphor and music. In R. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 502-524). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Antović, M., Bennett, A., & Turner, M. (2013). Running in circles or moving along lines: Conceptualization of musical elements in sighted and blind children. Musicæ Scientiæ, 17 (2), 229-245.
6. Antović, M. (2009). Musical metaphors in Serbian and Romani children: An empirical study. Metaphor and Symbol, 24 (3), 184-202.
7. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
8. Bar-Yosef, A. (2007). A cross-cultural structural analogy between pitch and time organizations. Music Perception, 24 (3), 265-280.
9. Brower, C. (2000, Fall). A cognitive theory of musical meaning. Journal of Music Theory, 44 (2), 323-379.
10. Call, J., & Tomasello, M.(2005). Reasoning and thinking in nonhuman primates. In K. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 607-632). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Casasanto, D.(2010). Space for thinking. In V. Evans, & P. A. Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 453-478). Advances in Cognitive Linguistics. London: Equinox Publishing, Ltd.
12. Chen, Z., Sanchez, R. P., & Campbell, T. (1997). From beyond to within their grasp: The rudiments of analogical problem solving in 10- and 13-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 33 (5), 790-801.
13. Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
15. Dolscheid, S., Shayan, S., Majid, A., & Casasanto, D. (2013). The thickness of musical pitch: Psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity. Psychological Science, 24 (5), 613-621.
16. Eitan, Z., & Granot, R. Y. (2007). Intensity changes and perceived similarity: Inter-parametric analogies. Musicæ Scientiæ, 11 (1 suppl), 39-75.
17. Eitan, Z., Granot, R. Y., & Ornoy, E. (2012). Listening in the dark: Congenital and early blindness and cross-domain mappings in music. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, & Brain, 22 (1), 33-45.
18. Eitan, Z., Schupak, A., Gotler, A., & Marks, L. E. (2014). Lower pitch is larger, yet falling pitches shrink. Experimental Psychology, 61 (4), 273-284.
19. Eitan, Z., & Timmers, R. (2010). Beethoven’s last piano sonata and those who follow crocodiles: Cross-domain mappings of auditory pitch in a musical context. Cognition, 114 (3), 405-422.
20. Engel, J. J. (1998 [1780]). On painting in music. In L. Treitler (Gen. Ed.), O. Strunk (Ed.), Source readings in music history (Rev. ed., pp. 954-965). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
21. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books.
22. Feld, S. (1981). Flow like a waterfall: The metaphors of Kaluli musical theory. Yearbook for Traditional Music, 13, 22-47.
23. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5 (3), 152-158.
24. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52 (1), 45-56.
25. Gentner, D.(2003). Why we’re so smart. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 195-235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Goswami, U.(2001). Analogical reasoning in children. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 437-470). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Hofstadter, D., & Sander, E. (2013). Surfaces and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. New York, NY: Basic Books.
28. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Johnson, G., & Wigmore, R. (2014). Franz Schubert: The complete songs. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30. Johnson, M. L. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31. Kielian-Gilbert, M. (1990). Interpreting musical analogy: From rhetorical device to perceptual process. Music Perception, 8 (1), 63-94.
32. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. L. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33. Lewin, D. (1987). Generalized musical intervals and transformations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34. Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100 (2), 254-278.
35. Palmer, S. E., Langlois, T. A., & Schloss, K. B. (2016). Music-to-color associations of single-line piano melodies in non-synesthetes. Multisensory Research, 29 (1-3), 157-193.
36. Parkinson, C., Kohler, P. J., Sievers, B., & Wheatley, T. (2012). Associations between auditory pitch and visual elevation do not depend on language: Evidence from a remote population. Perception, 41 (7), 854-861.
37. Peirce, C. S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce, Justus Buchler (Ed.). New York, NY: Dover.
38. Walker, P., Bremner, J. G., Mason, U., Spring, J., Mattock, K., Slater, A., et al. (2010). Preverbal infants’ sensitivity to synaesthetic cross-modality correspondences. Psychological Science, 21 (1), 21-25.
39. Zbikowski, L. M. (2002). Conceptualizing music: Cognitive structure, theory, and analysis. AMS Studies in Music. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40. Zbikowski, L. M. (2010). Music, emotion, analysis. Music Analysis, 29 (i-iii), 37-60.
41. Zbikowski, L. M.(2011). Musical gesture and musical grammar: A cognitive approach. In A. Gritten, & E. King (Eds.), New perspectives on music and gesture (pp. 83-98). SEMPRE studies in the psychology of music. Farnham, Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
42. Zbikowski, L. M. (2012a). Music, dance, and meaning in the early nineteenth century. Journal of Musicological Research, 31 (2/3), 147-165.
43. Zbikowski, L. M. (2012b). Music, language, and what falls in between. Ethnomusicology, 56 (1), 125-131.
44. Zbikowski, L. M. (2017). Foundations of musical grammar. Oxford Studies in Music Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.