In her shoes: How team interactions affect engineering self-efficacy

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Yasar, Senay ^a   Baker, Dale ^a   Krause, Stephen ^a   Roberts, Chell ^a,b,c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Society for Computer Simulation International

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS;

ENGINEERING CONCEPTS; FRESHMAN ENGINEERING CULTURE; LEARNING PROGRESS; PHYSIOLOGICAL REACTIONS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 85029057283     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Grose, T., "Trouble on the Horizon," Prism, October Issue, 2006, pp. 26-31.
2. National Science Foundation. 2002. Science and Engineering Indicators, Vol.1. Arlington: National Science Board.
3. Seymour, E., and N. Hewitt., Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Boulder: Westview Press, 1997.
4. Brainard, S.G. and L. Carlin, "A Six-Year Longitudinal Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering and Science," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 87, No. 4, 1998, pp.369-375.
5. Grandy, J., Gender and Ethnic Differences Among Science and Engineering Majors: Experiences, Achievements, and Expectation, Princeton: Educational Testing Services, RR 94-30, 1994.
6. Fuller, H. (1997). A study of confidence by gender. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Milwaukee, WI.
7. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Atman, C.J., Shuman, L.J. (1997). Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models for determining student attrition in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.86, No.2, pp. 139-149.
8. Hutchison, M.A., D.K. Follman, M. Sumpter, and G.M. Bodner (2006). Factors Influencing the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of First-Year Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 95, No. 1, pp. 39-47.
9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
10. Bong, M. and E.M. Skaalvik, "Academic Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy: How Different Are They Really?," Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2003, pp. 1-40.
11. "Assessing Women in Engineering (AWE) Project 2005: Self-Efficacy," AWE Research Overviews, 2005, www.aweonline.org
12. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
13. Kittleson, J.M. and S.A. Southerland, "The Role of Discourse in Group Knowledge Construction: A Case Study of Engineering Students," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol41, No.3, pp. 267-293.
14. Meece, M., What do women want? Just Ask, The New York Times October 29, 2006.
15. Pajares, F.,Hartley, J., and Valiante, G. (2001.) Response Format in Writing Self-Efficacy Assessment: Greater Discrimination Increases Prediction. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33, 214-221.