Nephrotex: Measuring first year students' ways of professional thinking in a virtual internship

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Arastoopour, Golnaz ^a   Chesler, Naomi C ^b   D'Angelo, Cynthia M ^c   Shaffer, David Williamson ^c   Opgenorth, Jamon W ^e   Reardan, Carrie Beth ^d   Haggerty, Nathan Patrick ^e   Lepak, Clayton Guy ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d Epistemic Game   (United States)

^e NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029043621     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Blickenstaff, J.C., Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 2005. 17(4): p. 369-386.
2. Leveson, N., Women in computer science. A report for the NSFCISE cross-disciplinaary activities advisory committee Dec, 1989.
3. National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators 2010, 2010, NSF.
4. Marra, R.M., et al., Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 2009. 98(1): p. 27-38.
5. Atkinson, R.D. and M.J. Mayo, Refueling the US Innovation Economy: Fresh Approaches to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education. 2011.
6. Huang, G., N. Taddese, and E. Walter, Entry and Persistence of Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education. Education Statistics Quarterly, 2000. 2(3): p. 59-60.
7. Berenson, S.B., et al., Voices of women in a software engineering course: reflections on collaboration. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), 2004. 4(1): p. 3.
8. Zastavker, Y.V., M. Ong, and L. Page. Women in engineering: Exploring the effects of project-based learning in a first-year undergraduate engineering program. 2006. IEEE.
9. Thom, M., M. Pickering, and R.E. Thompson. Understanding the barriers to recruiting women in engineering and technology programs. 2002. IEEE.
10. Duncan, J.R. and Y. Zeng, Women: Support factors and persistence in engineering, 2005, National Center for Engineering and Technology Education.
11. Lumsdaine, M. and E. Lumsdaine, Thinking preferences of engineering students: Implications for curriculum restructuring. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION-WASHINGTON-, 1995. 84: p. 193-204.
12. Johnson, D.W., R.T. Johnson, and K.A. Smith, Active learning1991: Interaction Book Co.
13. Schön, D.A., Educating the reflective practitioner1987: Jossey-Bass San Francisco.
14. Collins, A., J. Brown, and S. Newman, Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading. writing and mathematics (Technical Report No. 403). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign. Center for the Study of Reading.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 284 181), 1987.
15. Collins, A., J.S. Brown, and A. Holum, Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 1991. 15(3): p. 6-11.
16. Shaffer, D.W., Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Computers & Education, 2006. 46(3): p. 223-234.
17. Rupp, A.A., et al. Modeling learning progressions in epistemic games with epistemic network analysis: Principles for data analysis and generation. 2009.
18. Shaffer, D.W., et al., Epistemic network analysis: A prototype for 21st-century assessment of learning. 2009.
19. Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (2009). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, effective for evaluations during the, 2010. 2011.
20. Nash, P. and D.W. Shaffer. Mentor modeling: the internalization of modeled professional thinking in an epistemic game. 2010. International Society of the Learning Sciences.