Insights into the process of providing feedback to students on open-ended problems

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Cardella, Monica ^a   Heidi, Diefes Dux ^a   Oliver, Amber ^a   Verleger, Matthew ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Feedback; Open ended problems; Teaching assistants

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; FEEDBACK;

FEEDBACK TO STUDENTS; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; GRADUATE TEACHING ASSISTANTS; MODEL ELICITING ACTIVITIES; OPEN-ENDED PROBLEMS; TEACHING ASSISTANTS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85029026330     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) (2007). Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Engineering. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Baltimore, MD. Retrieved April 25, 2008, from http://www.abet.org/forms.shtml#For-Engineering-Programs-Only
2. Diefes-Dux, H.A., Moore, T., Zawojewski, J., Imbrie, P.K., and Follman, D. (2004). "A Framework for Posing Open-Ended Engineering Problems: Model Eliciting Activities", Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA.
3. Diefes-Dux, H.A. and Imbrie, P.K. (2008). "Chapter 4: Modeling Activities in a First-Year Engineering Course" In Zawojewski, J. S., Diefes-Dux, H., & Bowman, K. (Eds.) Models and modeling in Engineering Education: Designing experiences for all students. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
4. Diefes-Dux, H.A., Hjalmarson, M., Zawojewski, J., and Bowman, K. (2006). "Quantifying Aluminum Crystal Size Part 1: The Model-Eliciting Activity", Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 7(1&2):51-63.
5. Bowman, K.J and Siegmund, T. (2008). "Chapter 5: Designing Modeling Activities for Upper-Level Engineering Classes" In Zawojewski, J. S., Diefes-Dux, H., & Bowman, K. (Eds.) Models and modeling in Engineering Education: Designing experiences for all students. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
6. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., and Post, T., "Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers", Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 591-645, 2000.
7. Diefes-Dux. H.A, Hjalmarson, M., Miller, T., and Lesh, R. (2008). "Chapter 2: Model-Eliciting Activities for Engineering Education", In Zawojewski, J. S., Diefes-Dux, H., & Bowman, K. (Eds.) Models and modeling in Engineering Education: Designing experiences for all students. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
8. Verleger, M. & Diefes-Dux, H. (2008) Impact of Feedback and Revision on Student Team Solutions to Model-Eliciting Activities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education National Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
9. Blumenfeld, P.C. (1992) Classroom Learning and Motivation: Clarifying and Expanding Goal Theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 272-281.
10. Carroll, W. M. (1994) Using Worked Examples as an Instructional Support in the Algebra Classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 360-367.
11. Purdie, N. & Hattie, J. (1996) Cultural Differences in the Use of Strategies for Self-Regulated Learning, American Educational Research Journal, 33, 845-871.
12. Zessoules, R. & Gardner, H. (1991) Authentic Assessment: Beyond the Buzzword and Into the Classroom. In V. Perrone (Ed.) Expanding Student Assessment. (pp. 47-71). Alexandria Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
13. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139-148.
14. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L. & Steckler, P. M. (1991). Effects of Curriculum-Based Measurement and Consultation on Teacher Planning and Student Achievement in Mathematics Operations, American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617-641.
15. Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts M., and Philip Rowe (2008) Students' response to traditional and computerassisted formative feedback: A comparative case study British Journal of Educational Technology 39, 3.
16. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
17. Razmov, V. and Vlasseva, S. (2004) Feedback Techniques for Project-based Courses, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition,
18. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. and Furtak E. M. (2006) Informal Formative Assessment and Scientific Inquiry: Exploring Teachers' Practices and Student Learning Educational Assessment, 11(3 & 4),205-235
19. Davis, B. (1997) Listening for Differences: An Evolving Conception of Mathematics Teaching, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 355-376.
20. Zawojewski, J. S., Diefes-Dux, H., & Bowman, K. (Eds.) (2008). Models and Modeling in Engineering Education: Designing Experiences for All Students. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
21. Diefes-Dux, H.A., Osburn, K., Capobianco, B., and Wood, T. (2008). "Chapter 12: On the Front Line - Learning from the Teaching Assistants" In Zawojewski, J. S., Diefes-Dux, H., & Bowman, K. (Eds.) (in press). Models and modeling in Engineering Education: Designing experiences for all students. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
22. Verleger, M. & Diefes-Dux, H. (2009) Multi-Dimensional Tool for Assessing Student Team Solutions to Model-Eliciting Activities. Paper submitted for the annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education National Conference, Austin, TX.