Some virtues and limitations of action inferring interfaces

Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST 1992

Volumn , Issue , 1992, Pages 79-88

  Bos, Edwin ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Demonstrational interfaces; Multimodal interfaces; Programming by example

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LISP (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE);

INDUCTIVE INFERENCE; MULTI-MODAL INTERFACES; MULTI-MODALITY; NATURAL LANGUAGES; POINTING GESTURES; PROFESSIONAL USERS; PROGRAMMING BY EXAMPLE; REPETITIVE PATTERN;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 85028732802     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/142621.142631     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bos, E. (in press). A multimodal syntax-directed grapheditor. In L. Neat & G. Szwillus (Eds.) Structure-based Editors and Environments. New York: Academic Press.
2. Bos, E., Claassen, W., & Huls, C. (forthcoming). Edward: a multimodal interface. SPIN/MMC research report. Nljmegen: NICI.
3. Claassen, W. (1992). Generating referring expressions in a multimodal environment. In: Dale, R., Hovy, E., R6sner, D., & Stock, O, (Eds.) Aspects of automated natural language generation. Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on natural language generation, Trento, Italy, April 5-7. Berlin: Springer, pp. 247-262.
4. Claassen, W., Bos, E., & Huls, C. (1990). The Pooh Way in human-computer interaction: towards multimodal interfaces. SPIN/MMC Research report #5. Nijmegen: NICI.
5. Claassen. W.. Bos, E.. & Huls, C. (submitted). Automatic referent resolution in deictic ad anaphoric expressions. Submitted to Computational Linguistics.
6. Claassen, W. & Huls, C. (1991). DoNaLD: A Dutch Natural Language Dialogue system. SPIN/MMC research report #11. Nijmegen: NICI.
7. Conati, C. & Slack, J. (1992). Accessing information through graphics. ECAI'92 Conference proceedings, Vienna August 3-7.
8. Cypher, A. (1991). Eager: programming repetitive tasks by example. In: Robertson, S.P., Olson, G.M. & Olson, J.S. (Eds.) Reaching lhrough technology. CHI'91 Conference proceedings, pp. 33-39.
9. Cypher, A. (1992). Personal communication.
10. Forsyth, R. (Ed.) (1989). Machine learning. London: Chapman and Hall.
11. Frohlich, D.M. (1991) The design space of interfaces. In: Kjelldahl, L. (Ed.) Multimedia: principles, systems and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
12. Halbert, D.C. (1981). Programming By Example. PhD Thesis. Computer Science Division, Dept. of EE&CS, University of California.
13. Lewis, C, & Norman, D. (1986). Designing for error. In: Norman, D.A. & Draper, S.W. (Ed.) User centered system design: new perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Maulsby, D.L., Witten, I, H., & Kittlitz, K.A. (1989). Metamouse: specifying graphical procedures by example. Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH89, July 1989, Boston, MA.
15. Myers, B.A. (1988). Creating user interfaces by demomtration. Boston, MA: Academic Press.
16. Myers, B.A. (1990). Demonstrational interfaces: a step beyond direct manipulation. In: Diaper, D. & Hammond, N. (Eds, ) People and computers VI. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
17. Myers, B , A. (Ed.) (1991). Demonstrational interfaces: coming soon? In: Robertson, S.P., Olson, G.M. & Olson, J.S. (Eds.) Reaching through technology. CHI'91 Conference proceedings, pp. 393-397.
18. Norman, D , A. (1986). Cognitive engineering. In: Norman, D.A. & Draper, S, W. (Eds.) User centered system design: new perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Stallman, R.M. (1979). Emacs: the extensible, customizable, self-documenting display editor. Technical report #519. Cambridge, MA: MIT AI Lab.