Sepsis and Shock Response Team: Impact of a Multidisciplinary Approach to Implementing Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines and Surviving the Process

American Journal of Medical Quality

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 500-507

  Grek, Ami ^a   Booth, Sandra ^a   Festic, Emir ^a   Maniaci, Michael ^a   Shirazi, Ehsan ^a   Thompson, Kristine ^a   Starbuck, Angela ^a   Mcree, Chad ^a   Naessens, James M ^a   Moreno Franco, Pablo ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

quality; sepsis; team

Indexed keywords

AGED; CARE BUNDLE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE BUNDLES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; SEPSIS; SHOCK, SEPTIC;

EID: 85028608984     PISSN: 10628606     EISSN: 1555824X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1062860616676887     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR., Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1303-1310.
2. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368-1377.
3. Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1496-1506.
4. Lin SM, Huang CD, Lin HC, Liu CY, Wang CH, Kuo HP., A modified goal-directed protocol improves clinical outcomes in intensive care unit patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial. Shock. 2006;26:551-557.
5. Levy MM, Rhodes A, Phillips GS. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1623-1633.
6. Lilly CM., The ProCESS trial—a new era of sepsis management. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1750-1751.
7. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165-228.
8. Barochia AV, Cui X, Eichacker PQ., The Surviving Sepsis Campaign’s revised sepsis bundles. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2013;15:385-393.
9. Casserly B, Baram M, Walsh P, Sucov A, Ward NS, Levy MM., Implementing a collaborative protocol in a sepsis intervention program: lessons learned. Lung. 2011;189:11-19.
10. Schramm GE, Kashyap R, Mullon JJ, Gajic O, Afessa B., Septic shock: a multidisciplinary response team and weekly feedback to clinicians improve the process of care and mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:252-258.
11. Wang HE, Donnelly JP, Shapiro NI, Hohmann SF, Levitan EB., Hospital variations in severe sepsis mortality. Am J Med Qual. 2015;30:328-336.
12. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1301-1311.
13. Sebat F, Musthafa AA, Johnson D. Effect of a rapid response system for patients in shock on time to treatment and mortality during 5 years. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:2568-2575.
14. Funk D, Sebat F, Kumar A., A systems approach to the early recognition and rapid administration of best practice therapy in sepsis and septic shock. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15:301-307.