Measurement of peripheral venous catheter-related phlebitis: a cross-sectional study

The Lancet Haematology

Volumn 4, Issue 9, 2017, Pages e424-e430

  Göransson, Katarina ^a,b   Förberg, Ulrika ^a,b   Johansson, Eva ^b   Unbeck, Maria ^c  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c DANDERYD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY ASSESSMENT; ERYTHEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT REPEATABILITY; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PERIPHERAL VENOUS CATHETER; PHLEBITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SWELLING; VALIDITY; ADVERSE DEVICE EFFECT; CATHETER; MIDDLE AGED; VEIN;

AGED; CATHETERS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHLEBITIS; VEINS;

EID: 85028336905     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23523026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30122-9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Maki, DG, Kluger, DM, Crnich, CJ, The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc 81 (2006), 1159–1171.
2. Ray-Barruel, G, Polit, DF, Murfield, JE, Rickard, CM, Infusion phlebitis assessment measures: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 20 (2014), 191–202.
3. Webster, J, Osborne, S, Rickard, CM, New, K, Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8, 2015 CD007798.
4. Marsh, N, Mihala, G, Ray-Barruel, G, Webster, J, Wallis, MC, Rickard, CM, Inter-rater agreement on PIVC-associated phlebitis signs, symptoms and scales. J Eval Clin Pract 21 (2015), 893–899.
5. Webster, J, Clarke, S, Paterson, D, et al. Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 337, 2008, a339.
6. Rickard, CM, Webster, J, Wallis, MC, et al. Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet 380 (2012), 1066–1074.
7. Infusion Nurses Society. Phlebitis. J Infus Nurs 29 (2006), S58–S59 Abstract 53.
8. Barker, P, Anderson, AD, MacFie, J, Randomised clinical trial of elective re-siting of intravenous cannulae. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 86 (2004), 281–283.
9. Campbell, L, I.v.-related phlebitis, complications and length of hospital stay: 2. Br J Nurs 7 (1998), 1364–1366 1368–70, 1372–73.
10. Catney, MR, Hillis, S, Wakefield, B, et al. Relationship between peripheral intravenous catheter dwell time and the development of phlebitis and infiltration. J Infus Nurs 24 (2001), 332–341.
11. Curran, ET, Coia, JE, Gilmour, H, McNamee, S, Hood, J, Multi-centre research surveillance project to reduce infections/phlebitis associated with peripheral vascular catheters. J Hosp Infect 46 (2000), 194–202.
12. Hershey, CO, Tomford, JW, McLaren, CE, Porter, DK, Cohen, DI, The natural history of intravenous catheter-associated phlebitis. Arch Intern Med 144 (1984), 1373–1375.
13. Jackson, A, Infection control—a battle in vein: infusion phlebitis. Nurs Times, 94, 1998, 68 71.
14. Lanbeck, P, Odenholt, I, Paulsen, O, Antibiotics differ in their tendency to cause infusion phlebitis: a prospective observational study. Scand J Infect Dis 34 (2002), 512–519.
15. Lundgren, A, Jorfeldt, L, Ek, AC, The care and handling of peripheral intravenous cannulae on 60 surgery and internal medicine patients: an observation study. J Adv Nurs 18 (1993), 963–971.
16. Maddox, RR, Rush, DR, Rapp, RP, Foster, TS, Mazella, V, McKean, HE, Double-blind study to investigate methods to prevent cephalothin-induced phlebitis. Am J Hosp Pharm 34 (1977), 29–34.
17. Maddox, RR, John, JF Jr, Brown, LL, Smith, CE, Effect of inline filtration on postinfusion phlebitis. Clin Pharm 2 (1983), 58–61.
18. Maki, DG, Ringer, M, Risk factors for infusion-related phlebitis with small peripheral venous catheters. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 114 (1991), 845–854.
19. Nishanth, S, Sivaram, G, Kalayarasan, R, Kate, V, Ananthakrishnan, N, Does elective re-siting of intravenous cannulae decrease peripheral thrombophlebitis? A randomized controlled study. Natl Med J India 22 (2009), 60–62.
20. Rickard, CM, McCann, D, Munnings, J, McGrail, MR, Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med, 8, 2010, 53.
21. Van Donk, P, Rickard, CM, McGrail, MR, Doolan, G, Routine replacement versus clinical monitoring of peripheral intravenous catheters in a regional hospital in the home program: a randomized controlled trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 30 (2009), 915–917.
22. Webster, J, Lloyd, S, Hopkins, T, Osborne, S, Yaxley, M, Developing a Research Base for Intravenous Peripheral Cannula Re-Sites (DRIP trial). A randomised controlled trial of hospital in-patients. Int J Nurs Stud 44 (2007), 664–671.
23. DeLuca, PP, Rapp, RP, Bivins, B, McKean, HE, Griffen, WO, Filtration and infusion phlebitis: a double-blind prospective clinical study. Am J Hosp Pharm 32 (1975), 1001–1007.
24. Ahlqvist, M, Peripheral venous catheters: quality of care assessement. Licenciate thesis, 2010, Karolinska Institutet.
25. Cohen, JA, A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measur 20 (1960), 37–46.