Using Exploratory Factor Analysis to Determine the Dimensionality of Discrete Responses

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 87-101

  Barendse, M T ^a   Oort, F J ^b   Timmerman, M E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

discrete data; exploratory factor analysis; robust maximum likelihood estimation; weighted least squares estimation

Indexed keywords

LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL TESTS;

CONVERGENCE PROBLEMS; DISCRETE DATA; ESTIMATION METHODS; EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS (EFA); ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; WEIGHTED LEAST SQUARES; WEIGHTED LEAST SQUARES ESTIMATION;

FACTOR ANALYSIS;

EID: 85028145111     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: 15328007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2014.934850     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Simple second order chi-square correction. Mplus Technical Appendix. Retrieved from http://statmodel.com/download/WLSMV_new_chi21.pdf
2. Asparouhov, T., Muthén, M., & Muthén, B. (2006). Robust chi square difference testing with mean and variance adjusted test statistics. Mplus Web Notes. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/webnote.pdf
3. Beauducel, A. (2001). On the generalizability of factors: The influence of changing contexts of variables on different methods of factor extraction. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 6, 1–28.
4. Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least square estimation in confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186–203.
5. Briggs, N. E., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Recovery of weak common factors by maximum likelihood and ordinary least squares estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 25–56.
6. Browne, M. W. (1982). Covariance structures. In Topics in applied multivariate analysis, ed. D. M. Hawkins (pp. 72–141). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods in the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83.
8. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230–258.
9. Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 147–168.
10. Dolan, C. V. (1994). Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 5 and 7 response categories: A comparison of categorical variable estimators using simulated data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 309–326.
11. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.
12. Flora, D. B., & Curran, P.J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491.
13. Hayashi, K., Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K. H. (2007). On the likelihood ratio test for the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 505–526.
14. Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality and Quantity, 44, 153–166.
15. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.
16. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
17. Johnson, D. R., & Creech, J. C. (1983). Ordinal measures in multiple indicator models: A simulation study of categorization error. American Sociological Review, 48, 398–407.
18. Jöreskog, K. G., & Moustaki, I. (2001). Factor analysis of ordinal variables: A comparison of three approaches. Mulitvariate Behavioral Research, 36, 347–387.
19. Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.
21. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K., & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 611–637.
22. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.
23. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralising Hu & Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.
24. Muthén, B. O. (1998–2004). Mplus technical appendices. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Retrieved from http://statmodel.com/download/techappen.pdf
25. Muthén, B., du Toit, S. H., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Psychometrika, 75, 1–45.
26. Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189.
27. Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1992). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 19–30.
28. Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2010). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
29. Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., & Breivik, E. (2004). Two equivalent discrepancy functions for maximum likelihood estimation: Do their test statistics follow a non-central chi-square distribution under model misspecification? Sociological Methods Research, 32, 453–500.
30. Olsson, U. H., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (1999). Theoretic fit and empirical fit: The performance of maximum likelihood versus generalized least squares estimation in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 31–58.
31. Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13–32.
32. Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354.
33. Rigdon, E. E., & Ferguson, C. E. (1991). The performance of the polychoric correlation coefficient and selected fitting functions in confirmatory factor analysis with discrete data. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 491–497.
34. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514.
36. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243–248.
37. Sivo, S. A., Fan, X., Witta, E. L., & Willse, J. T. (2006). The search for “optimal” cut-off properties: Fit index criteria in structural equation modeling. Journal of Experimental Education, 74, 267–288.
38. Steiger, J. H., Shapiro, A., & Browne, M. W. (1985). On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential chi-square statistics. Psychometrika, 50, 253–264.
39. Ten Holt, J. C., van Duijn, M. A. J., & Boomsma, A. (2010). Scale construction and evaluation in practice: A review of factor analysis versus item response theory. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 272–297.
40. Wirth, R. J., & Edwards, M. C. (2007). Item factor analysis: Current approaches and future directions. Psychological Methods, 12, 58–79.
41. Yang-Wallentin, F., Jöreskog, K. G., & Luo, H. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables with misspecified models. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 392–423.
42. Yu, C. Y., & Muthén, B. (2002). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes (Technical report). Los Angeles, CA: University of California at Los Angeles, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.
43. Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Normal theory based test statistics in structural equation modelling. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 289–309.
44. Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. In M. E. Sobel & M. P. Becker (Eds.), Sociological methodology 2000 (pp. 165–200). Washington, DC: ASA.
45. Zhang, J., & Stout, W. F. (1999). Conditional covariance structure of generalized compensatory multidimensional items. Psychometrika, 64, 129–152.