The continuous end-state comfort effect: Weighted integration of multiple biases

Psychological Research

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 345-363

  Herbort, Oliver ^a   Butz, Martin V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85028092401     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0334-7     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adalbjornsson, C. F., Fischman, M. G., & Rudisill, M. E. (2008). The end-state comfort effect in young children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 36-41.
2. Bubic, A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schubotz, R. I. (2010). Prediction, cognition and the brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1-15.
3. Butz, M. V., Herbort, O., & Hoffmann, J. (2007). Exploiting redundancy for flexible behavior: Unsupervised learning in a modular sensorimotor control architecture. Psychological Review, 114(4), 1015-1046.
4. Chapman, K. M., Weiss, D. J., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2010). Evolutionary roots of motor planning: The end-state comfort effect in lemurs. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 124(2), 229-232.
5. Cisek, P. (2006). Integrated neural processes for defining potential actions and deciding between them: A computational model. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(38), 9761-9770.
6. Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 486-495.
7. Coren, S. (1993). The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: Norms for young adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(1), 1-3.
8. Crajé, C., van der Kamp, J., & Steenbergen, B. (2008). The effect of the "rod-and-frame" illusion on grip planning in a sequential object manipulation task. Experimental Brain Research, 185, 53-62.
9. Engelbrecht, S. E. (2001). Minimum principles in motor control. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 497-542.
10. Erlhagen, W., & Schöner, G. (2002). Dynamic field theory of movement preparation. Psychological Review, 109(3), 545-572.
11. Fischer, M. H., Rosenbaum, D. A., & Vaughan, J. (1997). Speed and sequential effects in reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(2), 404-428.
12. Fischman, M. G. (1998). Constraints on grip-selection: Minimizing awkwardness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 328-330.
13. Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985). The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. The Journal of Neuroscience, 5(7), 1688-1703.
14. Haggard, P. (1998). Planning of action sequences. Acta Psychologica, 99(2), 201-215.
15. Harris, C. M., & Wolpert, D. M. (1998). Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature, 394, 780-784.
16. Herbort, O., & Butz, M. V. (2007). Encoding complete body models enables task dependent optimal control. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 20, 1639-1644.
17. Herbort, O., & Butz, M. (2010). Planning and control of hand orientation in grasping movements. Experimental Brain Research, 202(4), 867-878.
18. Hughes, C. (1996). Brief report: Planning problems in autism at the level of motor control. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26(1), 99-107.
19. Johnson, S. H. (2000). Thinking ahead: The case for motor imagery in prospective judgements of prehension. Cognition, 74(1), 33-70.
20. Kelso, J. A. S., Buchanan, J. J., & Murata, T. (1994). Multifunctionality and switching in the coordination dynamics of reaching and grasping. Human Movement Science, 13(1), 63-94.
21. Knill, D. C., & Pouget, A. (2004). The bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends in Neurosciences, 27(12), 712-719. doi: 10. 1016/j. tins. 2004. 10. 007.
22. Marotta, J. J., Medendorp, W. P., & Crawford, J. D. (2003). Kinematic rules for upper and lower arm contributions to grasp orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 3816-3820.
23. Matsuoka, J., Berger, R. A., Berglund, L. J., & An, K.-N. (2006). An analysis of symmetry of torque strength of the forearm under resisted forearm rotation in normal subjects. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 31(5), 801-805.
24. O'Sullivan, L., & Gallwey, T. (2005). Forearm torque strengths and discomfort profiles in pronation and supination. Ergonomics, 48(6), 703-721.
25. Pezzulo, G., Butz, M. V., Gastelfranchi, C., & Falcone, R. (2008). The challenge of anticipation: A unifying framework for the analysis and design of artificial cognitive systems. Berlin: Springer.
26. Robert, T., Beurier, G., & Wang, X. (2009). Arm postural anticipation for rotating a spherical object. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 12(1), 217-218.
27. Rosenbaum, D. A., Cohen, R. G., Jax, S. A., Weiss, D. J., & van der Wel, R. (2007). The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley's legacy. Human Movement Science, 26, 525-554.
28. Rosenbaum, D. A., Halloran, E. S., & Cohen, R. G. (2006). Grasping movement plans. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 918-922.
29. Rosenbaum, D. A., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1992). Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control. Human Movement Science, 11(1-2), 61-69.
30. Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L. D., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Vaughan, J., & Engelbrecht, S. E. (1995). Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102(1), 28-67.
31. Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., Siotta, J. D., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance, Vol. XIII (pp. 321-345). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Rosenbaum, D. A., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Vaughan, J., & Jansen, C. (2001). Posture-based motion planning: Applications to grasping. Psychological Review, 108(4), 709-734.
33. Rosenbaum, D. A., van Heugten, C. M., & Caldwell, G. E. (1996). From cognition to biomechanics and back: The end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. Acta Psychologica, 94, 59-85.
34. Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., Barnes, H. J., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1992). Time course of movement planning: Selection of handgrips for object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 1058-1073.
35. Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., Jorgensen, M. J., Barnes, H. J., & Stewart, E. (1993). Plans for object manipulation. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance XIV-a silver jubilee: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 803-820). Cambridge: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
36. Schütz, C., Weigelt, M., Odekerken, D., Klein-Soetebier, & Schack, T. (in press). Motor control strategies in a continuous task space. Motor Control.
37. Short, M. W., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1999). Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect. Acta Psychologica, 100(3), 243-252.
38. Soechting, J. F., Buneo, C. A., Herrmann, U., & Flanders, M. (1995). Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: Does donders' law apply to arm movement? Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 6271-6280.
39. Steenbergen, B., Hulstijn, W., & Dortmans, S. (2000). Constraints on grip selection in cerebral palsy: Minimising discomfort. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 385-397.
40. Thibaut, J.-P., & Toussaint, L. (2010). Developing motor planning over ages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(1-2), 116-129.
41. Todorov, E. (2004). Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nature Review Neuroscience, 7(9), 907-915.
42. van der Vaart, A. J. M., (1995). Arm movements in operating rotary control (Doctoral thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft, The Netherlands). http://repository. tudelft. nl/assets/uuid: 20033739-71d9-42a4-bc3e-058d78ab8cec/ide_vaart_19950616. PDF.
43. van Swieten, L. M., van Bergen, E., Williams, J. H., Wilson, A. D., Plumb, M. S., Kent, S. W., et al. (2010). A test of motor (not executive) planning in developmental coordination disorder and autism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(2), 493-499.
44. Weigelt, M., Rosenbaum, D. A., Huelshorst, S., & Schack, T. (2009). Moving and memorizing: Motor planning modulates the recency effect in serial and free recall. Acta Psychologica, 132(1), 68-79.
45. Weiss, D. J., Wark, J. D., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Monkey see, monkey plan, monkey do: The end-state comfort effect in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Psychological Science, 18(12), 1063-1068.
46. Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1212-1217.
47. Zhang, W., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2008). Planning for manual positioning: The end-state comfort effect for manual abduction-adduction. Experimental Brain Research, 184, 383-389.