Spatial collaboration networks of OpenStreetMap

Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography

Volumn 0, Issue 9783319142791, 2015, Pages 167-186

  Stein, Klaus ^a   Kremer, Dominik ^a   Schlieder, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Interlocking; OSM; Social network analysis; User collaboration; User contribution

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

COLLABORATION NETWORK; COLLABORATION PATTERNS; EDITING OPERATIONS; HISTORY DATA; INTERLOCKING; INTERLOCKING RESPONSE; USER COLLABORATIONS; USER CONTRIBUTION;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE;

EID: 85027992540     PISSN: 18632246     EISSN: 18632351     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14280-7_9     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Budhathoki NR, Haythornthwaite C (2013) Motivation for open collaboration crowd and community models and the case of openstreetmap. Am Behav Sci 57(5):548–575
2. Crandall DJ, Backstrom L, Cosley D, Suri S, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J (2010) Inferring social ties from geographic coincidences. Proc Nat Acad Sci 107(52):22436–22441
3. Cranshaw J, Toch E, Hong J, Kittur A, Sadeh N (2010) Bridging the gap between physical location and online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on ubiquitous computing, ACM, pp 119–128
4. Freeman LC, Borgatti SP, White DR (1991) Centrality in valued graphs: a measure of betweenness based on network flow. Soc Netw 13(2):141–154
5. Gibson DR (2005) Taking turns and talking ties: networks and conversational interactionl. Am J Sociol 110(6):1561–1597
6. Girardin F, Vaccari A, Gerber A, Biderman A, Ratti C (2009) Quantifying urban attractiveness from the distribution and density of digital footprints. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 4:175–200
7. Haklay M (2013) Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation. Environ Plann A 45(1): 55–69
8. Haythornthwaite C (2012) Democratic process in online crowds and communities. JeDEM— eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 4(2). http://www.jedem.org/article/view/137
9. Hecht R, Kunze C, Hahmann S (2013) Measuring completeness of building footprints in openstreetmap over space and time. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 2(4):1066–1091
10. Keßler C, de Groot RTA (2013) Trust as a proxy measure for the quality of volunteered geographic information in the case of openstreetmap. In: Geographic Information Science at the Heart of Europe, Springer, Berlin, pp 21–37
11. Kittur A, Suh B, Pendleton BA, Chi EH (2007) He says, she says: conflict and coordination in wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 453–462
12. Kremer D, Stein K (2014) Ein Analyseansatz für Nutzerverhalten auf Basis von OSM-Daten. Kartographische Nachrichten 64(3):144–152 (German: An approach for analyzing user behavior on OSM data)
13. Mooney P, Corcoran P (2012a) Characteristics of heavily edited objects in openstreetmap. Future Internet 4(1):285–305
14. Mooney P, Corcoran P (2012b) How social is openstreetmap. In: Proceedings of the 15th association of geographic information laboratories for europe international conference on geographic information science, Avignon, France, pp 24–27
15. Mooney P, Corcoran P (2012c) The role of communities in volunteered geographic information projects. In: Krisp J (ed) Proceedings of the 9th symposium on location based services, vol 1, Springer, Berlin Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, pp 35–371
16. Mooney P, Corcoran P (2012d) Who are the contributors to openstreetmap and what do they do. In: Proceedings of GISRUK
17. Mooney P, Corcoran P (2013a) Analysis of interaction and co-editing patterns amongst openstreetmap contributors. Transactions in GIS
18. Mooney P, Corcoran P (2013b) Has openstreetmap a role in digital earth applications? Int J Digit Earth (ahead-of-print)
19. Mooney P, Corcoran P (2013c) Understanding the roles of communities in volunteered geographic information projects. In: Progress in Location-Based Services, Springer, Berlin pp 357–371
20. Neis P, Zipf A (2012) Analyzing the contributor activity of a volunteered geographic information project—the case of openstreetmap. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inform 1(2):146–165, doi:10.3390/ ijgi1020146, http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/1/2/146
21. Neis P, Zielstra D, Zipf A (2013) Comparison of volunteered geographic information data contributions and community development for selected world regions. Future Internet 5 (2):282–300
22. Newman ME (2001) The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98 (2):404–409
23. Opsahl T, Panzarasa P (2009) Clustering in weighted networks. Soc Netw 31(2):155–163
24. Rehrl K, Gröechenig S, Hochmair H, Leitinger S, Steinmann R, Wagner A (2013) A conceptual model for analyzing contribution patterns in the context of vgi. In: Progress in Location-Based Services, Springer, Berlin pp 373–388
25. Rhodes C, Keefe E (2007) Social network topology: a bayesian approach. J Oper Res Soc 58(12):1605–1611
26. Schmidt M, Klettner S (2013) Gender and experience-related motivators for contributing to openstreetmap. In: Mooney P, Rehrl K (eds) International workshop on action and interaction in volunteered geographic information (ACTIVITY), Leuven, Belgium, pp 13–18
27. Stefanidis A, Crooks A, Radzikowski J (2013) Harvesting ambient geospatial information from social media feeds. GeoJournal 78(2):319–338
28. Stein K, Blaschke S (2010) Interlocking communication: measuring collaborative intensity in social networks. In: Memon N, Alhajj R (eds) Social network analysis and mining: foundations and applications. Springer, Berlin
29. Xiao X, Zheng Y, Luo Q, Xie X (2014) Inferring social ties between users with human location history. J Ambient Intell Humanized Comput 5(1):3–19
30. Zheng Y (2011) Location-based social networks: users. In: Computing with spatial trajectories, Springer, Berlin pp 243–276
31. Zheng Y, Xie X (2011) Location-based social networks: locations. In: Computing with spatial trajectories, Springer, Berlin pp 277–308