The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline?

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 597-610

  Ferreira, Catarina ^a,b,c   Bastille Rousseau, Guillaume ^a   Bennett, Amanda M ^a   Ellington, E Hance ^a   Terwissen, Christine ^a   Austin, Cayla ^a   Borlestean, Adrian ^a   Boudreau, Melanie R ^a   Chan, Kevin ^a   Forsythe, Adrian ^a   Hossie, Thomas J ^a   Landolt, Kristen ^a   Longhi, Jessica ^a   Otis, Josée Anne ^a   Peers, Michael J L ^a   Rae, Jason ^a   Seguin, Jacob ^a   Watt, Cristen ^a   Wehtje, Morgan ^a   Murray, Dennis L ^a  

^a TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b CENTRO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO EM BIODIVERSIDADE E RECURSOS GENÉTICOS   (Portugal)

^c INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN RECURSOS CINEGÉTICOS IREC CSIC UCLM JCCM   (Spain)

Author keywords

critique; long term solutions; maladaptation; peer review; structural flaws

Indexed keywords

PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING; SCIENCE; STANDARDS; TRENDS;

PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING; SCIENCE;

EID: 85027956962     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469185X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/brv.12185     Document Type: Review

References (78)