A comparison of simple and complex population models to reduce uncertainty in ecological risk assessments of chemicals: Example with three species of Daphnia

Ecotoxicology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1268-1276

  Hanson, Niklas ^a   Stark, John D ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

2 stage model; Individual to population extrapolation; Leslie matrix; Population growth rate; Population modeling

Indexed keywords

CRUSTACEAN; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; FERTILITY; MORTALITY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION GROWTH; POPULATION MODELING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAPHNIA; DAPHNIA DUBIA; ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND RELATED PHENOMENA; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT; GROWTH RATE; NONHUMAN; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION GROWTH; POPULATION MODEL; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNCERTAINTY;

DAPHNIA;

EID: 85027956174     PISSN: 09639292     EISSN: 15733017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-011-0675-4     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Akçakaya HR, Stark JD, Bridges TS (eds) (2008) Demographic toxicity: methods in ecological risk assessment. Oxford University Press, New York
2. LW Barnthouse 2004 Quantifying population recovery rates for ecological risk assessment Environ Toxicol Chem 23 2 500 508 10.1897/02-521 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXotFylsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 38112581)
3. S Bartell K Campbell C Lovelock S Nair J Shaw 2000 Characterizing aquatic ecological risks from pesticides using diquat dibromide. Case Study III: Ecological process models Environ Toxicol Chem 19 1441 1453 10.1002/etc. 5620190529 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXislKjtLc%3D (Pubitemid 30230895)
4. M Boersma J Vijverberg 1994 Resource depression in Daphnia-Galeata, Daphnia-Cucullata and their interspecific hybrid-life-history consequences J Plankton Res 16 12 1741 1758 10.1093/plankt/16.12.1741
5. MC Bradley DJ Baird P Calow 1991 Mechanisms of energy allocation to reproduction in the cladoceran Daphnia-Magna Straus Biol J Linn Soc 44 4 325 333 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00623.x (Pubitemid 23401343)
6. P Calow VE Forbes 2003 Does ecotoxicology inform ecological risk assessment? Environ Sci Technol 37 7 146A 151A 10.1021/es0324003 (Pubitemid 36504932)
7. P Calow RM Sibly V Forbes 1997 Risk assessment on the basis of simplified life-history scenarios Environ Toxicol Chem 16 9 1983 1989 10.1002/etc. 5620160931 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXlslegurY%3D (Pubitemid 27360651)
8. Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models, 2nd edn. Sinauer associates, Imc. Publishers, Sunderland
9. S Ferson LR Ginzburg RA Goldstein 1996 Inferring ecological risk from toxicity bioassays Water Air Soil Pollut 90 1-2 71 82 10.1007/BF00619269 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XksFCisL8%3D (Pubitemid 26244021)
10. VE Forbes P Calow 1999 Is the per capita rate of increase a good measure of population-level effects in ecotoxicology? Environ Toxicol Chem 18 7 1544 1556 10.1002/etc.5620180729 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXktVCjsr0%3D (Pubitemid 29288068)
11. VE Forbes P Calow 2002 Extrapolation in ecological risk assessment: balancing pragmatism and precaution in chemical controls legislation Bioscience 52 3 249 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0249:EIERAB]2.0.CO;2
12. VE Forbes P Calow 2002 Population growth rate as a basis for ecological risk assessment of toxic chemicals Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357 1425 1299 1306 10.1098/rstb.2002.1129
13. VE Forbes P Calow RM Sibly 2001 Are current species extrapolation models a good basis for ecological risk assessment? Environ Toxicol Chem 20 2 442 447 10.1002/etc.5620200227 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXnsFSjug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32096911)
14. VE Forbes RM Sibly P Calow 2001 Toxicant impacts on density-limited populations: a critical review of theory, practice, and results Ecol Appl 11 4 1249 1257 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1249:TIODLP]2.0.CO;2 (Pubitemid 32731606)
15. VE Forbes P Calow RM Sibly 2008 The extrapolation problem and how population modeling can help Environ Toxicol Chem 27 10 1987 1994 10.1897/08-029.1 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht1Sgur7K
16. N Galic U Hommen JM Boveco PJ van den Brink 2010 Potential application of population models in the European ecological risk assessment of chemicals II: review of models and their potential to address environmental protection aims Integr Environ Assess Manag 6 3 338 360 10.1002/ieam.68 1:CAS:528: DC%2BC3cXhtVWmtbrE
17. ZM Gliwicz D Wrzosek 2008 Predation-mediated coexistence of large- and small-bodied Daphnia at different food levels Am Nat 172 3 358 374 10.1086/589890
18. U Hommen J Baveco N Galic PJ van den Brink 2010 Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals I: review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations Integr Environ Assess Manag 6 3 325 337 10.1002/ieam.69 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtVWmtbrL
19. W Hovenkamp 1990 Instar-specific mortalities of coexisting Daphnia species in relation to food and invertebrate predation J Plankton Res 12 3 483 495 10.1093/plankt/12.3.483
20. SA Levin CP Goodyear 1980 Analysis of an age-structured fishery model J Math Biol 9 3 245 274 10.1007/BF00276028 (Pubitemid 10006137)
21. Ricker W (1975) Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fish res bd Canada bull 191. Department of the environment, fisheries and marine service, Ottawa
22. JD Stark 2005 How closely do acute lethal concentration estimates predict effects of toxicants on populations? Integr Environ Assess Manag 1 2 109 113 10.1897/IEAM-2004-002r.1 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXjvVyrsb8%3D
23. JD Stark JAO Banken 1999 Importance of population structure at the time of toxicant exposure Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 42 3 282 287 10.1006/eesa.1998.1760 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXhvFKku7w%3D (Pubitemid 29157614)
24. JD Stark RI Vargas 2003 Demographic changes in Daphnia pulex (Leydig) after exposure to the insecticides spinosad and diazinon Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 56 3 334 338 10.1016/S0147-6513(02)00074-X 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXot1Gks78%3D (Pubitemid 37324091)
25. JD Stark RL Sugayama A Kovaleski 2007 Why demographic and modeling approaches should be adopted for estimating the effects of pesticides on biocontrol agents Biocontrol 52 3 365 374 10.1007/s10526-006-9040-6 (Pubitemid 46632488)