Model comparison on genomic predictions using high-density markers for different groups of bulls in the Nordic Holstein population

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 96, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 4678-4687

  Gao, H ^a,b   Su, G ^a   Janss, L ^a   Zhang, Y ^b   Lund, M S ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Genetic relationship; Genomic prediction; High density marker; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

FAT; MILK PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BOVINE MASTITIS; BREEDING; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; LACTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MILK; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BREEDING; CATTLE; FATS; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; LACTATION; MALE; MASTITIS, BOVINE; MILK; MILK PROTEINS; MODELS, GENETIC; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 85027954711     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6538     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Browning B.L., Browning S.R. A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. Am. J. Hum. Genet 2009, 84:210-223.
2. Clark S.A., Hickey J.M., Daetwyler H.D., van der Werf J.H.J. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes. Genet. Sel. Evol 2012, 44:4.
3. Damien P., Wakefield J., Walker S. Gibbs sampling for Bayesian non-conjugate and hierarchical models by using auxiliary variables. J. R. Stat. Soc. B Stat. Methodol 1999, 61:331-344.
4. Dunn O.J., Clark V. Comparison of tests of the equality of dependent correlation coefficients. J. Am. Stat. Assoc 1971, 66:904-908.
5. Erbe M., Hayes B.J., Matukumalli L.K., Goswami S., Bowman P.J., Reich C.M., Mason B.A., Goddard M.E. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. J. Dairy Sci 2012, 95:4114-4129.
6. George E.I., McCulloch R.E. Variable selection via Gibbs sampling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc 1993, 88:881-889.
7. Habier D., Fernando R.L., Dekkers J.C.M. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 2007, 177:2389-2397.
8. Habier D., Fernando R.L., Dekkers J.C.M. Genomic selection using low-density marker panels. Genetics 2009, 182:343-353.
9. Habier D., Tetens J., Seefried F.R., Lichtner P., Thaller G. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol 2010, 42:5.
10. Harris B., Johnson D. The impact of high density SNP chips on genomic evaluation in dairy cattle. Interbull Mtg 2010, Pages 40-43 in Proc.
11. Hayes B.J., Bowman P.J., Chamberlain A.J., Goddard M.E. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci 2009, 92:433-443. a.
12. Hayes B.J., Visscher P.M., Goddard M.E. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet. Res. (Camb.) 2009, 91:47-60. b.
13. Jairath L., Dekkers J.C., Schaeffer L.R., Liu Z., Burnside E.B., Kolstad B. Genetic evaluation for herd life in Canada. J. Dairy Sci 1998, 81:550-562.
14. Lund M.S., de Ross S.P.W., de Vries A.G., Druet T., Ducrocq V., Fritz S., Guillaume F., Guldbrandtsen B., Liu Z., Reents R. A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predictions. Genet. Sel. Evol 2011, 43:43.
15. Lund M.S., Su G., Nielsen U.S., Aamand G.P. Relation between accuracies of genomic predictions and ancestral links to the training data. Proc 2009, Interbull Mtg., Barcelona, Spain. Interbull, Uppsala, Sweden, Pages 162-166.
16. Madsen, P., and J. Jensen. 2010. A User's Guide to DMU. Version 6, Release 5.0. University of Aarhus, Faculty Agricultural Sciences (DJF), Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Research Centre Foulum, Tjele, Denmark.
17. Meuwissen T., Goddard M. Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing. Genetics 2010, 185:623-631.
18. Meuwissen T.H.E. Accuracy of breeding values of "unrelated" individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genet. Sel. Evol 2009, 41:35.
19. Ostersen T., Christensen O.F., Henryon M., Nielsen B., Su G., Madsen P. Deregressed EBV as the response variable yield more reliable genomic predictions than traditional EBV in pure-bred pigs. Genet. Sel. Evol 2011, 43:38.
20. Park T., Casella G. The Bayesian lasso. J. Am. Stat. Assoc 2008, 103:681-686.
21. Pszczola M., Strabel T., Mulder H.A., Calus M.P.L. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. J. Dairy Sci 2012, 95:389-400.
22. Schaeffer L.R. Multiple trait international bull comparisons. Livest. Prod. Sci 2001, 69:145-153.
23. Solberg T.R., Sonesson A.K., Woolliams J.A., Meuwissen T.H. Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. J. Anim. Sci 2008, 86:2447-2454.
24. Steiger J.H. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol. Bull 1980, 87:245.
25. Strandén I., Mäntysaari E.A. A recipe for multiple trait deregression. Proc 2010, Interbull Mtg., Riga, Latvia. Interbull, Uppsala, Sweden, Pages 21-24.
26. Su G., Brondum R.F., Ma P., Guldbrandtsen B., Aamand G.R., Lund M.S. Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (~54,000) and high-density (~777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations. J. Dairy Sci 2012, 95:4657-4665. a.
27. Su G., Christensen O.F., Ostersen T., Henryon M., Lund M.S. Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e45293. b.
28. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc., B 1996, 58:267-288.
29. VanRaden P.M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci 2008, 91:4414-4423.
30. VanRaden P.M., Van Tassell C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Schenkel F.S. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci 2009, 92:16-24.
31. Yi N., Xu S. Bayesian LASSO for quantitative trait loci mapping. Genetics 2008, 179:1045-1055.