Outcome of a second patch test reading of TRUE Tests® on D6/7

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 94-97

  Torp Madsen, Jakob ^a   Andersen, Klaus Ejner ^a  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

contact dermatitis; delayed patch test reading; patch test; TRUE Test

Indexed keywords

BUDESONIDE; HYDROCORTISONE BUTYRATE; NEOMYCIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ECZEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATCH TEST; REACTION ANALYSIS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 85027949481     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cod.12004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Geier J, Gefeller O, Wiechmann K, Fuchs T., Patch test reactions at D4, D5 and D6. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 40: 119-126.
2. Dickel H, Taylor J S, Evey P, Merk H F., Delayed readings of a standard screening patch test tray: frequency of 'lost', 'found', and 'persistent' reactions. Am J Contact Dermat 2000: 11: 213-217.
3. Jonker M J, Bruynzeel D P., The outcome of an additional patch-test reading on days 6 or 7. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 330-335.
4. Macfarlane A W, Curley R K, Graham R M, Lewis-Jones M S, King C M., Delayed patch test reactions at days 7 and 9. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 20: 127-132.
5. Mitchell J C., Day 7 (D7) patch test reading -valuable or not? Contact Dermatitis 1978: 4: 139-141.
6. Saino M, Rivara G P, Guarrera M., Reading patch tests on day 7. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 312-313.
7. Rietschel R L, Adams R M, Maibach H I, Storrs F J, Rosenthal L E., The case for patch test readings beyond day 2: notes from the lost and found department. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988: 18: 42-45.
8. Baeck M, Goossens A., Immediate and delayed allergic hypersensitivity to corticosteroids: practical guidelines. Contact Dermatitis 2012: 66: 38-45.
9. Isaksson M., Corticosteroid contact allergy -the importance of late readings and testing with corticosteroids used by the patients. Contact Dermatitis 2007: 56: 56-57.
10. Fullerton A, Andersen J R, Hoelgaard A., Permeation of nickel through human skin in vitro -effect of vehicles. Br J Dermatol 1988: 118: 509-516.
11. Brasch J, Schnuch A, Uter W., The profile of patch test reactions to common contact allergens is related to sex. Contact Dermatitis 2008: 58: 37-41.
12. Zhai H, Meier-Davis S R, Cayme B, Shudo J, Maibach H., Allergic contact dermatitis: effect of age. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2012: 31: 20-25.
13. Menné T, White I., Standardization in contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2008: 58: 321.
14. Brasch J, Fartasch M., German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Standardization in contact dermatitis -a highly desirable aim. Contact Dermatitis 2009: 60: 351-352.
15. Carlson S, Gipson K, Nedorost S., Relevance of doubtful ('equivocal') late patch-test readings. Dermatitis 2010: 21: 102-108.
16. Svedman C, Isaksson M, Björk J, Mowitz M, Bruze M., 'Calibration' of our patch test reading technique is necessary. Contact Dermatitis 2012: 66: 180-187.