Comparative study of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty donor preparation by moria cbm microkeratome, horizon microkeratome, and intralase FS60

Cornea

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 320-324

  Mootha, V Vinod ^a   Heck, Ellen ^b   Verity, Steven M ^a   Petroll, W Matthew ^a   Lakshman, Neema ^a   Muftuoglu, Orkun ^a   Bowman, R Wayne ^a   McCulley, James P ^a   Cavanagh, H Dwight ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; endothelial cell density; femtosecond laser; microkeratome; posterior lamellar keratoplasty; roughness; surface

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CELL ASSAY; CELL DENSITY; CELL VIABILITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA ENDOTHELIUM; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; DISSECTION; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; FEMTOSECOND LASER; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; LASER; MICROKERATOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPECULAR MICROSCOPY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

EID: 85027944809     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181f22cc3     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Maeno A, Naor J, Lee HM, et al. Three decades ofcorneal transplantation: indications andpatient characteristics. Cornea. 2000;19:7-11. (Pubitemid 30007736)
2. Mamalis N, Anderson CW, Kreisler KR, et al. Changing trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110: 1409-1411.
3. Pineros O, Cohen EJ, Rapuano CJ, et al. Long-term results after pene-trating keratoplasty for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:15-18. (Pubitemid 26026188)
4. Melles GR, Eggink FA, Lander F, et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellarkeratoplasty. Cornea. 1998;17:618-626.
5. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1541-1548.
6. Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2006;25:886-889. (Pubitemid 44763845)
7. Price MO, Price FW. Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1936-1942. (Pubitemid 44635703)
8. Price FW Jr, Price MO. Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: early challenges andtechniques to enhance donor adherence. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:411-418.
9. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Replacing the endothelium without corneal surface incisions or sutures. The first United States clinical series using the deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty procedure. Ophthalmology. 2003;110: 755-764. (Pubitemid 36520075)
10. Ousley PJ, Terry MA. Stability ofvision, topography, and endothelial cell density from 1 year to 2 years after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:50-57. (Pubitemid 40075318)
11. Koenig SB, Covert DJ, Dupps WJ, et al. Visual acuity, refractive error, and endothelial cell density six months after Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Cornea. 2007;26:670-674. (Pubitemid 47080283)
12. Kobayashi A, Mawatari Y, Yokogawa H, et al. In vivo laser confocal microscopy after Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:977-985.
13. Terry MA, Hoar KL, Wall J, et al. Histology ofdislocations in endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK and DLEK): a laboratory-based, surgical solution to dislocation in 100 consecutive DSEK cases. Cornea. 2006;25:926-932. (Pubitemid 44763853)
14. Terry MA, Chen ES, Shamie N, et al. Endothelial cell loss after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:488-496.
15. Kitzmann A, Goins KM, Reed C,etal. Eye bank survey of surgeons using precut donor tissue for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2008;27:634-639.
16. Sarayba MA, Ignacio TS, Binder PS, et al. Comparative study of stromal bed quality by using mechanical, Intralase femtosecond laser 15-and 30-kHz microkeratomes. Cornea. 2007;26:446-451. (Pubitemid 46684386)
17. Jones YJ, Goins KM, Sutphin JE, et al. Comparison of the femtosecond laser (Intralase) versus manual microkeratome (Moria ALTK) in dissec-tion of the donor in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2008;27:88-93