SARNET hydrogen deflagration benchmarks: Main outcomes and conclusions

Annals of Nuclear Energy

Volumn 74, Issue C, 2014, Pages 143-152

  Bentaib, A ^a   Bleyer, A ^a   Meynet, N ^a   Chaumeix, N ^b   Schramm, B ^c   Hohne M ^c   Kostka, P ^d   Movahed, M ^e   Worapittayaporn, S ^e   Brahler T ^f   Seok Kang, H ^g   Povilaitis, M ^h   Kljenak, I ⁱ   Sathiah, P ^j  

^a INSTITUT DE RADIOPROTECTION ET DE SÛRETÉ NUCLÉAIRE IRSN   (France)

^b ICARE CNRS   (France)

^c GESELLSCHAFT FÜR ANLAGEN UND REAKTORSICHERHEIT GRS MBH   (Germany)

^d NUBIKI   (Hungary)

^e AREVA NP GMBH   (Germany)

^f RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^g Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute   (South Korea)

^h LITHUANIAN ENERGY INSTITUTE   (Lithuania)

ⁱ Jozef Stephan Institute   (Slovenia)

^j NUCLEAR RESEARCH AND CONSULTANCY GROUP NRG   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

CFD; Combustion; Diluents; Hydrogen; LP; Turbulence

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLAMMABILITY; FLAMMABILITY TESTING; HYDROGEN; MIXTURES; NUCLEAR REACTORS; REACTOR CORES; SHOCK WAVES; TURBULENCE; WALLS (STRUCTURAL PARTITIONS);

ATMOSPHERE PRESSURE; CONTAINMENT BUILDINGS; DILUENTS; GEOMETRICAL CONFIGURATIONS; HYDROGEN DEFLAGRATION; LARGE PRESSURE GRADIENTS; LP; MIXTURE COMPOSITIONS;

COMBUSTION;

EID: 85027938345     PISSN: 03064549     EISSN: 18732100     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. ANSYS CFX Tutorials, 2006. Release 11.0, December 2006.
2. Bentaib, A., Chaumeix, N., 2012. SARNET H2 Combustion Benchmark Specification of ENACCEF test-Diluent effect on flame propagation, RAPPORT DSR/SAGR N 206.
3. Bentaib, A., et al., 2012. Final results of the SARNET hydrogen deflagration benchmark-effect of turbulence on flame acceleration. In: 5th European Review Meeting on Severe Accident Research (ERMSAR-2012) Cologne (Germany), March 21-23, 2012.
4. GexCon, 2010. FLACS v9.1 User's Manual. International Standard Problem, 2012. ISP49 on hydrogen deflagration, OECD report CSNI-r2011-9.
5. Kljenak, I., Mavko, B., Simulation of ENACCEF experiments on hydrogen combustion with the CONTAIN Code. In: Proceedings of 20th International Conference Nuclear Energy for New Europe 2011, Bovec, Slovenia, September 12-15, 2011.
6. Kotchourko, A., Yanez, J., Lelyakin, A., 2010. Tutorial guide, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.
7. Lamoureux, N., Djebaili-Chaumeix, N., Paillard, C., 2003. Laminar flame velocity determination for H2-air-He-CO2 mixtures using the spherical bomb method. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 27 (4), 385-393.
8. Liu, D., MacFarlane, R., 1983. Laminar burning velocities of hydrogen-air and hydrogen-air-steam flames. Combust. Flame 49 (1-3), 59-71.
9. Malet, F., 2005. Etude expérimentale et numérique de la propagation de flammes prémélangées turbulentes dans une atmosphère pauvre en hydrogène et humide. Ph.D. Thesis. Université dÓrléans
10. Peters, N., 1997. New Developments in the Theory of Premixed Turbulent Combustion, Cours sur la Combustion Turbulente. Institut de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, 28 October.
11. Van Dorsselaere, J.P., Seropian, C., Chatelard, P., Jacq, F., Fleurot, J., Giordano, P., Reinke, N., Schwinges, B., Allelein, H.J., Luther, W., 2009. The ASTEC integral code for severe accident simulation. Nuclear Technol. 165, 293-307.