Comparison of the diagnostic utility of electromyography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome determined by clinical findings.

Neurosurgery

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 610-616

  Deniz, Fatih Ersay ^a   Oksüz, Erol ^b   Sarikaya, Başar ^b   Kurt, Semiha ^b   Erkorkmaz, Unal ^b   Ulusoy, Hasan ^b   Arslan, Sule ^b  

^a GAZIOSMANPASA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 85027936775     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15244040     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (0)