Does model of maternity care make a difference to birth outcomes for young women? A retrospective cohort study

International Journal of Nursing Studies

Volumn 52, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1332-1342

  Allen, Jyai ^a   Gibbons, Kristen ^b   Beckmann, Michael ^c   Tracy, Mark ^d   Stapleton, Helen ^c   Kildea, Sue ^c  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Mater Research   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adolescent pregnancy; Antenatal care; Cohort study; Maternity care; Midwifery; Perinatal outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 85027933959     PISSN: 00207489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allen J., Gamble J., Stapleton H., Kildea S. Does the way maternity care is provided affect maternal and neonatal outcomes for young women? A review of the research literature. Women Birth 2012, 25(2):54-63.
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics An Introduction to Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) 2008, Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2039.0.
3. Catling C.J., Medley N., Foureur M., Ryan C., Leap N., Teate A., Homer C.S.E. Group versus conventional antenatal care for women. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, (2). Art. No.: CD007622. 10.1002/14651858.CD007622.pub3.
4. Celik I.H., Demirel G., Canpolat F.E., Dilmen U. A common problem for neonatal intensive care units: late preterm infants, a prospective study with term controls in a large perinatal center. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013, 26(5):459-462.
5. Chen X.K., Wen S.W., Fleming N., Demissie K., Rhoads G.G., Walker M. Teenage pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a large population based retrospective cohort study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 36(2):368-373. dyl284 (pii). 10.1093/ije/dyl284.
6. de Vienne C.M., Creveuil C., Dreyfus M. Does young maternal age increase the risk of adverse obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcomes: a cohort study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2009, 147(2):151-156.
7. Department of Health and Ageing Improving Maternity Services in Australia: A Discussion Paper from the Australian Government 2008, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
8. Ehiri J.E., Child I.G. Maternal and child health in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. Maternal and Child Health: Global Challenges, Programs and Policies 2009, 53-81. Springer, New York. J.E. Ehiri (Ed.).
9. Fleming N., Tu X., Black A.Y. Improved obstetrical outcomes for adolescents in a community-based outreach program: a matched cohort study. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2012, 34:1134-1140.
10. Forti A., Stapleton H., Kildea S. Mobile technologies and communication strategies in an urban Midwifery Group Practice setting. An exploratory study. Women Birth 2013, 26(4):235-239.
11. Gibbons K., Chang A., Flenady V., Mahomed K., Gardener G., Gray P.H., Rossouw D. Customised birthweight models: do they increase identification of at-risk infants?. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2013, 49(5):380-387. 10.1111/jpc.12189.
12. Gilbert W.M., Nesbitt T.S., Danielsen B. The cost of prematurity: quantification by gestational age and birth weight. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 102(3):488-492.
13. Guilliland K., Pairman S. The Midwifery Partnership a Model for Practice 1995, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington.
14. Hartz D.L., Foureur M., Tracy S.K. Australian caseload midwifery: the exception or the rule. Women Birth 2012, 25(1):39-46.
15. Ickovics J.R., Kershaw T.S., Westdahl C., Magriples U., Massey Z., Reynolds H., Schindler Rising S. Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2007, 110(2):330-339.
16. Ickovics J.R., Reed E., Magriples U., Westdahl C., Rising S.S., Kershawa T. Effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial risk in pregnancy: results from a randomised controlled trial. Psychol. Health Med. 2011, 26(2):235-250.
17. Imamura M., Tucker J., Hannaford P., da Silva M.O., Astin M., Wyness L., Temmerman M. Factors associated with teenage pregnancy in the European Union countries: a systematic review. Eur. J. Public Health 2007, 17(6):630-636. ckm014 (pii). 10.1093/eurpub/ckm014.
18. Kabir K., Sheeder J., Stevens-Simon C. Depression, weight gain, and low birth weight adolescent delivery: do somatic symptoms strengthen or weaken the relationship?. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2008, 21(6):335-342. 10.1016/j.jpag.2008.06.003.
19. Khashan A.S., Baker P.N., Kenny L.C. Preterm birth and reduced birthweight in first and second teenage pregnancies: a register-based cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010, 10(36):1471-2393.
20. Lang C., Lams J. Goals and strategies for prevention of preterm birth: an obstetric perspective. Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 2009, 56(3):537-563.
21. Lasiuk G.C., Comeau T., Newburn-Cook C. Unexpected: an interpretive description of parental traumas' associated with preterm birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013, 13. 10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S13.
22. Laws P., Sullivan E.A. Australia's Mothers and Babies 2007 2009, National Perinatal Statistics Unit, Canberra.
23. Malabarey O.T., Balayla J., Klam S.L., Shrim A., Abenhaim H.A. Pregnancies in young adolescent mothers: a population-based study on 37 million births. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2012, 25(2):98-102. 10.1016/j.jpag.2011.09.004.
24. Medical Research Council Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance 2008, Retrieved from http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC004871.
25. Milligan R., Wingrove B.K., Richards L., Rodan M., Monroe-Lord L., Jackson V., Hatcher B., Harris C., Henderson C., Johnson A.A. Perceptions about prenatal care: view of urban vulnerable groups. BMC Public Health 2002, 2:25.
26. Novick G. Women's experience of prenatal care: an integrative review. J. Midwifery Womens Health 2009, 54(3):226-237. 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.02.003.
27. Parker M., Burnham L., Cook J., Sanchez E., Philipp B.L., Merewood A. 10 years after baby-friendly designation: breastfeeding rates continue to increase in a US neonatal intensive care unit. J. Hum. Lact. 2013, 29(3):354-358.
28. Payne J., Smythe L. Young and pregnant. New Zeal. College Midwives 2007, 36:20-25.
29. Quinlivan J.A., Evans S.F. Teenage antenatal clinics may reduce the rate of preterm birth: a prospective study. BJOG 2004, 111(6):571-578. BJO00146 (pii). 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00146.x.
30. Raatikainen K., Heiskanen N., Heinone S. Under-attending free antenatal care is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007, 7:268.
31. Raatikainen K., Heiskanen N., Verkasalo P., Heinonen S. Good outcomes of teenage pregnancies in high-quality maternity care. Eur. J. Public Health 2005, 16(2):157-161.
32. Sandall J., Soltani H., Gates S., Shennan A., Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Pregnancy Childbirth Group 2013, 8. Retrieved from http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD004667/PREG_midwife-led-continuity-models-versus-other-models-of-care-for-childbearing-women.
33. Savitz D.A., Kaufman J.S., Dole N., Siega-Riz A.M., Thorp J.M., Kaczor D.T. Poverty, education, race, and pregnancy outcome. Ethn. Dis. 2004, 14(3):322-329.
34. Sheppard V.B., Zambrana R.E., O'Malley A.S. Providing health care to low-income women: a matter of trust. J. Fam. Pract. 2004, 21:484-491.
35. Shrim A., Ates S., Mallozzi A., Brown R., Ponette V., Levin I., Almog B. Is young maternal age really a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome in a Canadian tertiary referral hospital?. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2011, S1083-3188(11)00106-9 (pii). 10.1016/j.jpag.2011.02.008.
36. Stanley N., Borthwick R., Macleod A. Antenatal depression: mothers' awareness and professional responses. Prim. Health Care Res. Dev. 2006, 7:257-268.
37. Tracy S.K., Hartz D.L., Tracy M.B., Allen J., Forti A., Hall B., Kildea S. Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013, 382(9906):1723-1732.
38. van Gelder M.M., Reefhuis J., Caton A.R., Werler M.M., Druschel C.M., Roeleveld N. Characteristics of pregnant illicit drug users and associations between cannabis use and perinatal outcome in a population-based study. J. Alcohol. Drug Depend. 2010, 109(1-3):243-247.
39. Vieira C.L., Coeli C.M., Pinheiro R.S., Brandao E.R., Camargo K.R., Aguiar F.P. Modifying effect of prenatal care on the association between young maternal age and adverse birth outcomes. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2012, 25(3):185-189.
40. Viner R.M., Ozer E.M., Denny S., Marmot M., Resnick M., Fatusi A., Currie C. Adolescence and the social determinants of health. Lancet 2012, 379(9826):1641-1652. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60149-4.
41. World Health Organisation Adolescent health epidemiology. Maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health 2004, Retrieved from World Health Organisation website: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/epidemiology/adolescence/en/.
42. World Health Organisation Maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health 2014, Retrieved from http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/topics/maternal/adolescent_pregnancy/en/.