Transforming the twenty-first-century campus to enhance the net-generation student learning experience: using evidence-based design to determine what works and why in virtual/physical teaching spaces

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 903-920

  Fisher, Kenn ^a   Newton, Clare ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

evidence based design; learning environments; learning space evaluation; pedagogy; student experience; TEAL; university design

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027929706     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2014.890566     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ALC Pilot Evaluation Team. (2007). Active learning classrooms pilot evaluation: Fall 2007 findings and recommendations. The University of Minnesota. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from http://www.classroom.umn.edu/projects/alc_report_final.pdf
2. ALTC. (2012). Evaluation of learning spaces project. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from http://www.swinburne.edu.au/spl/learningspacesproject/index.html
3. Andrews, T., & du Toit, L. (2010, November 30). Evaluation of the UQ advanced concept teaching space (Final Report). Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
4. Batterham, R. (2000). The chance to change (Final report by the Chief Scientist to the Minister for Industry, Science and Resources as part of the Australian Science Capability Review). Canberra: DEST, Commonwealth of Australia.
5. Belcher, J., Dourmashkin, P., & Litster, D. (2000). Technology enhanced active learning. MIT website. Retrieved September 15, 2012, from http://web.mit.edu/edtech/casestudies/teal.html
6. Bissaker, K. (2010). The processes and outcomes of professional learning in an innovative school: The construction of an explanatory model. Unpublished thesis. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from http://catalogue.flinders.edu.au/local/adt/public/adt-SFU20100309.162227/index.html
7. Blackmore, J., Bateman, D., Loughlin, J., O'Mara, J., & Aranda, G. (2011). Research into the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes: Literature review (Paper No. 22). Research and Innovations Centre, Department of Education & Early Childhood Development, Victorian Government.
8. CDIO. (2012). CDIO [Home page]. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from www.cdio.org
9. Chang, R., Stern, L., Sondergaard, H., & Hadgraft, R. (2009). Places for learning engineering: A preliminary report of informal learning spaces. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from http://rees2009.pbworks.com/f/rees2009_submission_86.pdf
10. Chubb, I. (2012). Mathematics, engineering & science in the national interest. Canberra: Office of the Chief Scientist, Commonwealth of Australia.
11. Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2014). Literature review of the relationship between Pedagogy, ICT and space in learning environments. Journal of Learning Environments, 17(1): 1–28.
12. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Learning & Skills Research Centre. Retrieved July 1, 2014, from http://www.leerbeleving.nl/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/learning-styles.pdf
13. De La Harpe, B., Fraser, K., Prentice, F., Mason, T., Fisher, K., & Imms, W. (2011). Not a waste of space. Ongoing OLT funded research project. Retrieved September 9, 2012, from http://www.olt.gov.au/project-not-waste-space-professional-development-staff-teaching-new-generation-learning-spaces-2011
14. Educause. (2012). Spaces: Specialist resources. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from www.educause.edu
15. Fisher, K. (2002). Schools as prisons of learning: A critical psychosocial pedagogy of space. Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Education, Flinders University, Adelaide.
16. Fisher, K. (2003). The campus as thirdspace. Educause (Australia) conference proceedings, Melbourne.
17. Gallagher, S., & Garrett, G. (2012). From University exports to the multi-national university: The internationalisation of higher education in Australia and the United States. United States Study Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney.
18. Gibson, J.J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 127–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Habraken, J. (1998). The structure of the ordinary. Cambridge and London: MIT Press
20. JISC. (2006). Designing spaces for effective learning: A guide to 21st century learning space design. Joint Information Systems Committee. London: Higher Education Funding Council for England. Retrieved June 13, 2014, from www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/JISClearningspaces.pdf
21. Keppell, M., Souter, K., & Riddle, M. (2012). Physical and virtual learning spaces in higher education: Concepts for the modern learning environment. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-114-0
22. LEaRN (2012). The Learning Environments Applied Research Network. The University of Melbourne. Retrieved July 1, 2014, from http://learnetwork.edu.au/
23. Miller, A., Imrie, B., & Cox, K. (1998). Student assessment in higher education: A handbook for assessing performance. London: Kogan Page.
24. Mitchell, W. (1996). City of bits: Space, place and the infobahn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Mitchell, W. (2003). New generation learning environments. Workshop at Queensland University of Technology with Fisher, K., Brisbane. Unpublished.
26. Morgan, D.L. (2006). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods, applications to health research. In S. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Emergent methods in social research (p. 4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Nagata, K., & Ronkowski, S. (1998). Collaborative learning: Differences between collaborative and cooperative learning. The Office of Instructional Consultation, University of California Santa Barbara. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from http://www.oic.id.ucsb.edu/Resources/Collab-L/Differences.html
28. Norman, D. (2010). The research practice gap. Interactions, 17(4), 9–12.
29. Scottish Funding Council. (2006). Spaces for learning: A review of learningspaces in further and higher education. Edinburgh: Scottish Funding Council. Retrieved June 13, 2014, from http://www.sfc.ac.uk/web/FILES/learningfiles/Spaces_for_Learning_report.pdf
30. Smith, E., Quinn, D., & Aziz, M. (2011, July 26–29). First year engineering learning space – enhancing the student experience. Proceedings of the 118th annual conference for the American Association for Engineering Education, Vancouver.
31. The University of Adelaide. (2012). Leap into collaborative learning [Home page]. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from http://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/handle/2440/71211
32. Tom, J., Voss, K., & Scheetz, C. (2008). The space is the message: Firstassessment of a learning studio. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/TheSpaceIstheMessageFirstAsses/162874
33. Translational Research. (2014). The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from http://www.translationalres.com/aims
34. Ulrich, R., Xiaobo, Q., Zimring, C., Anjali, J., & Choudhary, R. (Eds.). (2005). The role of the physical environment in the hospital of the 21st century: A once in-a-lifetime opportunity. Concord, TX: Center for Health Systems and Design, College of Architecture.