Reply to Rouder (2014): Good frequentist properties raise confidence

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 309-311

  Sanborn, Adam N ^a   Hills, Thomas T ^a   Dougherty, Michael R ^b   Thomas, Rick P ^c   Yu, Erica C ^b   Sprenger, Amber M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian statistics; Hypothesis testing; Statistical inference

Indexed keywords

BAYES THEOREM; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BAYES THEOREM; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 85027926215     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0607-4     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Armitage, P., McPherson, C. K., & Rowe, B. C. (1969). Repeated significance tests on accumulating data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 132, 235-244.
2. Berger, J. O., & Wolpert, R. L. (1988). The likelihood principle. Hayward: Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
3. Hurley, D. (2014). Smarter: The new science of building brain power. New York: Hudson Street Press.
4. John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23, 524-532. doi: 10. 1177/0956797611430953.
5. Kerridge, D. (1963). Bounds for the frequency of misleading Bayes inferences. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34, 1109-1110.
6. Lindley, D. V. (1957). A statistical paradox. Biometrika, 44, 187-192.
7. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984). Sensitivity of Bayes inference with data-dependent stopping rules. American Statistician, 38, 106-109.
8. Rouder, J. N. (2014). Optional stopping: No problem for Bayesians. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
9. Sanborn, A. N., & Hills, T. T. (2014). The frequentist implications of optional stopping on Bayesian hypothesis tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi: 10. 3758/s13423-013-0518-9.
10. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359-1366. doi: 10. 1177/0956797611417632.
11. Smith, C. (1953). The detection of linkage in human genetics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 15, 153-192.
12. Sprenger, A. M., Atkins, S. M., Bolger, D. J., Harbison, J. I., Novick, J. M., Weems, S. A., Dougherty, M. R. (2013). Training working memory: Limits of transfer. Intelligence, 41, 638-663. doi: 10. 1016/j. intell. 2013. 07. 013.
13. Tidwell, J. W., Dougherty, M. R., Chrabaszcz, J. R., Thomas, R. P., & Mendoza, J. L. (2013). What counts as evidence for working memory training? Problems with correlated gains and dichotomization. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. doi: 10. 3758/s13423-013-0560-7.
14. Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Grünwald, P. (2006). A Bayesian perspective on hypothesis testing: A comment on Killeen (2005). Psychological Science, 17, 641-642. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2006. 01757. x.
15. Yu, E. C., Sprenger, A. M., Thomas, R. P., & Dougherty, M. R. (2014). When decision heuristics and science collide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi: 10. 3758/s13423-013-0495-z.