Landfill site selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study for Istanbul

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 73, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 3513-3521

  Beskese, Ahmet ^a   Demir, H Handan ^a   Ozcan, H Kurtulus ^b   Okten, H Eser ^a  

^a BAHCESEHIR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Fuzzy AHP; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Landfill site selection; Municipal solid waste

Indexed keywords

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; SITE SELECTION;

CLIMATOLOGICAL CONDITIONS; ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS; FUZZY AHP; FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (FUZZY AHP); FUZZY TECHNIQUES; FUZZY TOPSIS; LANDFILL SITE SELECTION; MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISIONS;

LAND FILL;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; LANDFILL; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; SITE SELECTION;

ISTANBUL [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 85027919839     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-014-3635-5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Akinci G, Guven ED, Gok G (2012) Evaluation of waste management options and resource conservation potentials according to the waste characteristics and household income: a case study in Aegean Region, Turkey. Resour Conserv Recycl 58:114–124
2. Al-Jarrah O, Abu-Qdais H (2006) Municipal solid waste landfill siting using intelligent system. Waste Manag 26:299–306
3. Al-Yaqout AF, Koushki PA, Hamoda MF (2002) Public opinion and siting solid waste landfills in Kuwait. Resour Conserv Recycl 35:215–227
4. Barlaz M, Kaplan P, Ranjithan S, Rynk R (2003) Evaluating environmental impacts of solid waste management alternatives. BioCycle 44:52–56
5. Beskese A, Kahraman C, Irani Z (2004) Quantification of flexibility in advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy concept. Int J Prod Econ 89:45–56
6. Bozbura FT, Beskese A, Kahraman C (2007) Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP. Expert Syst Appl 32(4):1100–1112
7. Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Set Syst 114:1–9
8. Chen CT, Lin CT, Sue-Fn H (2006) A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 102:289–301
9. Dai C, Li YP, Huang GH (2011) A two-stage support-vector-regression optimization model for municipal solid waste management—a case study of Beijing, China. J Environ Manag 92(12):3023–3037
10. Donevska KR, Gorsevski PV, Jovanovski M, Pesevski I (2012) Regional non-hazardous landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP and geographic information systems. Environ Earth Sci 67:121–131
11. Ertuğrul İ, Karakaşoğlu N (2008) Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39(7):783–795
12. Gbanie SP, Tengbe PB, Momohb JS, Medo J, Tamba V, Kabbac S (2013) Modelling landfill location using geographic information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA): case study Bo, Southern Sierra Leone. Appl. Geogr 36:3–12
13. Gorsevski PV, Donevska KR, Mitrovski CD, Frizado JP (2012) Integrating multi-criteria evaluation techniques with geographic information systems for landfill site selection: a case study using ordered weighted average. Waste Manag 32:287–296
14. Huang S, Li X, Wang Y (2012) A new model of geo-environmental impact assessment of mining: a multiple-criteria assessment method integrating fuzzy-AHP with fuzzy synthetic ranking. Environ Earth Sci 66:275–284
15. Hunce SY, Akgul D, Demir G, Mertoglu B (2012) Solidification/stabilization of landfill leachate concentrate using different aggregate materials Waste Manag 32:1394–1400
16. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Springer, New York
17. Kahraman C, Cebi S (2009) A new multi-attribute decision making method: hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):4848–4861
18. Kanat G (2010) Municipal solid waste management in Istanbul. Waste Manag 30:1737–1745
19. Lohri CR, Camenzind EJ, Zurbrügg C (2014) Financial sustainability in municipal solid waste management—costs and revenues in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Waste Manag 34(2):542–552
20. Moh YC, Abd Manaf L (2014) Overview of household solid waste recycling policy status and challenges in Malaysia. Resour Conserv Recycl 82:50–61
21. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):445–455
22. Ozcakar N, Demir HH (2011) İmalat sektöründe bulanık TOPSIS yöntemiyle tedarikçi seçimi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Yönetim Dergisi 22(69):25–44
23. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York
24. Shahabi S, Keihanfard S, Bin Ahmad B, Amiri MJT (2013) Evaluating Boolean, AHP and WLC methods for the selection of waste landfill sites using GIS and satellite images. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-013-2816-y
25. Shaw K, Shankar R, Yadav SS, Thakur LS (2012) Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Syst Appl 39(9):8182–8192
26. Sener B, Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2006) Landfill site selection by using geographic information systems. Environ Geol 49:376–388
27. Spires EE (1991) Using the analytic hierarchy process to analyze multi-attribute decisions. Multivar Behav Res 26:345–361
28. TUIK (2012) Turkish Statistical Institute, Official newsletter, No. 16
29. Yoon KP, Hwang CL (1995) Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction. Sage University Paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, Thousand Oaks, CA
30. Zhang Y, Huang GH, He L (2014) A multi-echelon supply chain model for municipal solid waste management system. Waste Manag 34(2):553–561
31. Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353
32. Zamorano M, Molero E, Hurtado A, Grindlay A, Ramos A (2008) Evaluation of a municipal landfill site in Southern Spain with GIS-aided methodology. J Hazard Mater 160:473–481
33. Zimmermann HJ (1994) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston