Cost-benefit analysis of three-dimensional craniofacial models for midfacial distraction: A pilot study

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 612-617

  Rogers Vizena, Carolyn R ^a   Sporn, Susan Flath ^a   Daniels, Kimberly M ^a   Padwa, Bonnie L ^a,b,c   Weinstock, Peter ^d,e,f  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Anesthesiology   (United States)

^c HARVARD SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Simulator Program (SIMPeds)   (United States)

^e Critical Care Medicine   (United States)

^f HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

3D model; 3D printing; Additive manufacturing; Le Fort III; Midfacial advancement; Midfacial distraction; Rapid prototyping

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; CRANIOFACIAL MALFORMATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; LIQUORRHEA; MALE; MIDFACIAL DISTRACTION; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PILOT STUDY; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; ANATOMIC MODEL; CROUZON SYNDROME; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; ECONOMICS; LE FORT OSTEOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CHILD; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CRANIOFACIAL DYSOSTOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; OPERATIVE TIME; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; OSTEOTOMY, LE FORT; PILOT PROJECTS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRINTING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85027097921     PISSN: 10556656     EISSN: 15451569     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1597/15-281     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Azuma M, Yanagawa T, Ishibashi-Kanno N, Uchida F, Ito T, Yamagata K, Hasegawa S, Sasaki K, Adachi K, Tabuchi K, et al. Mandibular reconstruction using plates prebent to fit rapid prototyping 3-dimensional printing models ameliorates contour deformity. Head Face Med. 2014;10:45.
2. Cheung CL, Looi T, Lendvay TS, Drake JM, Farhat WA. Use of 3-dimensional printing technology and silicone modeling in surgical simulation: development and face validation in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Surg Educ. 2014;71:762-767.
3. Chopra K, Folstein MK, Manson PN, Gastman BR. Complex craniofacial reconstruction using stereolithographic modeling. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:59-63.
4. Cunningham LL Jr, Madsen MJ, Peterson G. Stereolithographic modeling technology applied to tumor resection. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:873-878.
5. D'Urso PS, Barker TM, Earwaker WJ, Bruce LJ, Atkinson RL, Lanigan MW, Arvier JF, Effeney DJ. Stereolithographic biomodelling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1999;27:30-37.
6. Engel M, Hoffmann J, Castrillon-Oberndorfer G, Freudlsperger C. The value of three-dimensional printing modelling for surgical correction of orbital hypertelorism. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;19:91-95.
7. Erickson DM, Chance D, Schmitt S, Mathis J. An opinion survey of reported benefits from the use of stereolithographic models. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:1040-1043.
8. Gerstle TL, Ibrahim AM, Kim PS, Lee BT, Lin SJ. A plastic surgery application in evolution: three-dimensional printing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:446-451.
9. Jacobs S, Grunert R, Mohr FW, Falk V. 3D-Imaging of cardiac structures using 3D heart models for planning in heart surgery: a preliminary study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008;7:6-9.
10. Jedrzejewski P, Maciejewski A, Szymczyk C, Wierzgon J. Maxillary reconstruction using a multi-element free fibula flap based on a threedimensional polyacrylic resin model. Pol Przegl Chir. 2012;84:49-55.
11. Kaplan RS, Anderson SR. Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing: A Simpler and More Powerful Path to Higher Profits. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation; 2007.
12. Kernan BT, Wimsatt JA III. Use of a stereolithography model for accurate, preoperative adaptation of a reconstruction plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58:349-351.
13. Klammert U, Böhm H, Schweitzer T, Würzler K, Gbureck U, Reuther J, Kübler A. Multi-directional Le Fort III midfacial distraction using an individual prefabricated device. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009;37:210-215.
14. Salgueiro MI, Stevens MR. Experience with the use of prebent plates for the reconstruction of mandibular defects. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2010;3:201-208.
15. Schmauss D, Gerber N, Sodian R. Three-dimensional printing of models for surgical planning in patients with primary cardiac tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:1407-1408.
16. Schmauss D, Haeberle S, Hagl C, Sodian R. Three-dimensional printing in cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology: a singlecentre experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47:1044-1052.
17. Sodian R, Weber S, Markert M, Loeff M, Lueth T, Weis FC, Daebritz S, Malec E, Schmitz C, Reichart B. Pediatric cardiac transplantation: three-dimensional printing of anatomic models for surgical planning of heart transplantation in patients with univentricular heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:1098-1099.
18. Sodian R, Weber S, Markert M, Rassoulian D, Kaczmarek I, Lueth TC, Reichart B, Daebritz S. Stereolithographic models for surgical planning in congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1854-1857.
19. Toro C, Robiony M, Costa F, Zerman N, Politi M. Feasibility of preoperative planning using anatomical facsimile models for mandibular reconstruction. Head Face Med. 2007;3:5.
20. Waran V, Narayanan V, Karuppiah R, Owen SL, Aziz T. Utility of multimaterial 3D printers in creating models with pathological entities to enhance the training experience of neurosurgeons. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:489-492.
21. Waran V, Narayanan V, Karuppiah R, Thambynayagam HC, Muthusamy KA, Rahman ZA, Kirollos RW. Neurosurgical endoscopic training via a realistic 3-dimensional model with pathology. Simul Healthc. 2015;10:43-48.
22. Wulf J, Vitt KD, Erben CM, Bill JS, Busch LC. Medical biomodelling in surgical applications: results of a multicentric European validation of 466 cases. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;94:404-406.