Web Performance Evaluation for Internet of Things Applications

IEEE Access

Volumn 4, Issue , 2016, Pages 6974-6992

  Babovic, Zoran B ^a   Protic, Jelica ^b   Milutinovic, Veljko ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^b School of Electrical Engineering   (Serbia)

Author keywords

performance evaluation; Real time systems; sensor systems and applications; web and internet services

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; HTML; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; USER INTERFACES;

INTERNET OF THING (IOT); INTERNET OF THINGS APPLICATIONS; INTERNET SERVICES; MESSAGING PROTOCOLS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS; PLATFORM IMPLEMENTATIONS; REAL-TIME APPLICATION; SENSOR SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS;

INTERNET OF THINGS;

EID: 85027073498     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21693536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2615181     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. L. Atzori, A. Iera, and G. Morabito, The Internet of Things: A survey," Comput. Netw., vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 2787-2805, Oct. 2010.
2. D. Miorandi, S. Sicari, F. De Pellegrini, and I. Chlamtac, Internet of Things: Vision, applications and research challenges," Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1497-1516, Sep. 2012.
3. A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash, Internet of Things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications," IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347-2376, 4th Quart., 2015.
4. Z. Babovic and V. Milutinovic, Novel system architectures for semanticbased integration of sensor networks," Adv. Comput., vol. 90, pp. 91-183, Dec. 2013.
5. J. Åkerberg, M. M. Gidlund, and M. Björkman, Future research challenges in wireless sensor and actuator networks targeting industrial automation," in Proc. 9th IEEE Int. Conf. Ind. Inform. (INDIN), Jul. 2011, pp. 410-415.
6. R. van der Meulen. (Nov. 2015). Gartner Says 6.4 Billion Connected Things' Will Be in Use in 2016, Up 30 Percent From 2015, accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3165317
7. (Nov. 2015). Ericsson Mobility Report, accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Http://www.ericsson.com/res/docs/2015/mobilityreport/ericsson-mobility-report-nov-2015.pdf
8. M. Asay. (Jun. 2014). The Internet of Things Will Need Millions of Developers By 2020, accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Http://readwrite.com/2014/06/27/internet-of-things-developers-jobsopportunity
9. COMET, accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Http://infrequently.org/2006/03/comet-low-latency-data-for-the-browser
10. I. Fette and A. Melnikov, TheWebSocket protocol," IETF Internet Draft, Work in Progress, Dec. 2011.
11. (Jul. 20, 2016). HTML Canvas 2D Context. [Online]. Available: Http://www.w3.org/TR/2dcontext/
12. Z. Shelby, K. Hartke, and C. Bormann, The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP), document RFC 7252, Jun. 2014, accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Https://tools. ietf.org/html/rfc7252
13. C. Gutwin, M. Lippold, and T. C. N. Graham, Real-time groupware in the browser: Testing the performance ofWeb-based networking," in Proc. ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperat. Work, 2011, pp. 167-176.
14. Message Queue Telemetry Transport, MQTT, accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Http://mqtt.org/
15. Advanced Messaging Quieing Protocol, accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Https://www.amqp.org/
16. OASIS, Burlington, MA, USA. OASIS Advanced Message Queuing Pro-tocol (AMQP) Version 1.0, accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc-home.php?wg-abbrev=amqp
17. Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP), accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Http://xmpp.org/
18. P. Saint-Andre. (2011). Extensible Messaging and Presence Proto-col (XMPP): Core, accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6120
19. S. Bendel, T. Springer, D. Schuster, and A. Schill, A service infrastructure for the Internet of Things based on XMPP," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Pervas. Comput. Commun. Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2013, pp. 385-388.
20. M. Kirsche and R. Klauck, Unify to bridge gaps: Bringing XMPP into the Internet of Things," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Pervas. Comput. Commun. Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), Mar. 2012, pp. 455-458.
21. A. Hornsby and E. Bail,-XMPP: Lightweight implementation for low power operating system Contiki," in Proc. Int. Conf. Ultra Modern Telecommun. Workshops (ICUMT), Oct. 2009, pp. 1-5.
22. XMPP Client for mbed, accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Https://developer.mbed.org/cookbook/XMPPClient
23. Data Distribution Service (DDS), accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Http://portals.omg.org/dds/
24. P. Waher and Y. Doi, Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Format, document XEP-0322, 2013.
25. T. Kamiya and J. Schneider, Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Format 1.0, document Rec. REC-Exi-20110310, World Wide Web Consortium, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011.
26. Google Protocol Buffer, accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
27. JVM-Serializers Benchmark, accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Https://github.com/eishay/jvm-serializers/wiki
28. Action Message Format-AMF 3, accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/amf/pdf/amf-le-format-spec.pdf
29. N. Fernández, J. Arias, L. Sánchez, D. Fuentes-Lorenzo, and Ó. Corcho, RDSZ: An approach for lossless RDF stream compression," in Proc. Extended Semantic Web Conf. (ESWC), vol. 8465, 2014, pp. 52-67.
30. A. K. Joshi, P. Hitzler, and G. Dong, Logical linked data compression," in The SemanticWeb: Semantics and Big Data, vol. 7882, 2013, pp. 170-184.
31. J. D. Fernández, M. A. Martínez-Prieto, C. Gutiérrez, A. Polleres, and M. Arias, Binary RDF representation for publication and exchange," J. Web Semantics, vol. 19, pp. 22-41, Mar. 2013.
32. V. Gazis et al., A survey of technologies for the Internet of Things," in Proc. Int. Wireless Commun. Mobile Comput. Conf. (IWCMC), 2015, pp. 1090-1095.
33. V. Karagiannis, P. Chatzimisios, F.Vazquez-Gallego, and J. Alonso-Zarate, A survey on application layer protocols for the Internet of Things," Trans. IoT Cloud Comput., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 11-17, 2015.
34. P. Masek et al., Implementation of true IoT vision: Survey on enabling protocols and hands-on experience," Int. J. Distrib. Sensor Netw., vol. 12, no. 4, p. 8160282, 2016.
35. A. Bröring et al., New generation sensor Web enablement," Sensors, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2652-2699, 2011.
36. D. Thangavel, X. Ma, A. Valera, H.-X. Tan, and C. K.-Y. Tan, Performance evaluation of MQTT and CoAP via a common middleware," in Proc. IEEE 9th Int. Conf. ISSNIP, Apr. 2014, pp. 1-6.
37. M. Laine and K. Saïlä, Performance evaluation of XMPP on the Web," Aalto Univ., Aalto, Finland, Tech. Rep., 2012.
38. J. L. Fernandes, I. C. Lopes, J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, and S. Ullah, Performance evaluation of RESTfulWeb services and AMQP protocol," in Proc. 5th ICUFN, 2013, pp. 810-815.
39. V. Pimentel and B. G. Nickerson, Communicating and displaying realtime data with WebSocket," IEEE Internet Comput., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 45-53, Jul. 2012.
40. K. Ma and R. Sun, Introducing WebSocket-based real-time monitoring system for remote intelligent buildings," Int. J. Distrib. Sensor Netw., vol. 9, no. 12, 2013, Art. no. 867693.
41. R. C. Hoetzlein, Graphics performance in rich Internet applications," IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 98-104, Sep./Oct. 2012.
42. A. Kos, S. Tomai, and A. Umek, Evaluation of smartphone inertial sensor performance for cross-platform mobile applications," Sensors, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 477, 2016.
43. A. Botta, W. Donato, V. Persico, and A. Pescapé, Integration of cloud computing and Internet of Things: A survey," Future Generat. Comput. Syst., vol. 56, pp. 684-700, Mar. 2016.
44. M. Diáz, C. Martín, and B. Rubio, State-of-the-art, challenges, and open issues in the integration of Internet of Things and cloud computing," J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 67, pp. 99-117, May 2016.
45. J. Mineraud, O. Mazhelisb, X. Suc, and S. Tarkoma, A gap analysis of Internet-of-Things platforms," Comput. Commun., vols. 89-90, pp. 5-16, Sep. 2016.
46. J. P. Calbimonte, S. Sarni, J. Eberle, and K. Aberer, XGSN: An opensource semantic sensing middleware for the Web of Things," in Proc. 7th Int. Workshop Semantic Sensor Netw., Riva del Garda, Italy, Oct. 2014, pp. 51-66.
47. A. Kos, S. Tomai, and A. Umek, Suitability of smartphone inertial sensors for real-time biofeedback applications," Sensors, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 301, 2016.
48. D. Mills. IEEE 1588 Precision Time Protocol (PTP), accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ptp.html
49. D. Mills et al., Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algo-rithms Specification, document IETF RFC 5905, Jun. 2010, accessed on Jul. 20, 2016. [Online]. Available: Http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5905 x