Broadcast reform revisited: Reverend Everett C. Parker and the “standing” case (office of communication of the United church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission)

Communication Review

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 311-348

  Horwitz, Robert B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027040071     PISSN: 10714421     EISSN: 15477487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10714429709368562     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §706 (1946).
2. Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §706(2)(A) (1982).
3. Ashmore, H. S., 1973. Fear in the Air: Broadcasting and the First Amendment: The Anatomy of a Constitutional Crisis., New York: WW Norton.
4. Associated Industries, Inc. v. Ickes, 134 F.2d 694 (2nd Cir., 1943)
5. Bates, S., 1995. Realigning Journalism With Democracy: The Hutchins Commission, Its Times, and Ours., Washington, DC: Annenberg Washington Program in Communications Policy Studies of Northwestern University.
6. Baughman, J. L., 1985. Television's Guardians: The FCC and the Politics of Programming, 1958-1967., Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
7. Blakely, R. J., 1979. To Serve the Public Interest: Educational Broadcasting in the United States., Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.
8. Blanchard, M. A., 1977. The Hutchins Commission, the press and the responsibility concept. Journalism Monographs, 49: 1–59.
9. Brief of Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ et al. November 16, 1967. FCC, In re Application of Lamar Life Insurance Company for Renewal of License of Television Station WLBT and Auxiliary Services, Jackson, Mississippi.
10. Brotman, S. N., 1986. Keeping the public involved in broadcast licensing. The National Law Journal., March 31
11. Capitol Broadcasting Co., 38 FCC 1135 (1965)
12. Chicago Federation of Labor v. Federal Radio Commission, 41 F.2d 422 (D.C. Cir. 1930)
13. 1968. Cleavage widens at the FCC. Broadcasting., July 15
14. Commission on Freedom of the Press. 1947. A Free and Responsible Press, A General Report on Mass Communication: Newspapers, Radio, Motion Pictures, Magazines, and Books., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Echeverria, J., and Eby, R. B., eds. 1995. Let the People Judge: Wise Use and the Private Property Rights Movement., Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
16. 1968. FCC revisits WLBT (TV) renewal case. Broadcasting., June 10
17. FCC v. NBC, 319 U.S. 239 (1943)
18. FCC v. Sanders Brothers Radio Station, 309 U.S. 470 (1940)
19. FCC. 1946. Public Service Responsibility of Broadcast Licensees., Washington D.C.: FCC.
20. FCC. May 26 1966. Order. May 26, In re Applications of Lamar Life Broadcasting Company For Renewal of License of Television WLBT and Auxiliary Services, Jackson, Mississippi
21. FCC. 1960. Report and Statement of Policy re: Commission en banc Programming Inquiry. FCC, 44: 2303
22. FCC. 1949. Report on Editorializing by Broadcast Licensees. FCC, 13: 1246
23. FCC. December 3 1979. Memorandum Opinion and Order. December 3, In re Applications of Lamar Life Broadcasting Company, Civic Communications Corporation, Dixie National Broadcasting Corporation, Jackson Television, Inc., Channel 3, Inc. for a Construction Permit. Lenore G. Ehrig, Chief Administrative Law Judge
24. Friendly, F. W., 1975. The Good Guys, The Bad Guys and the First Amendment: Free Speech vs. Fairness in Broadcasting., New York: Random House.
25. Garland, M. B., 1985. Deregulation and judicial review. Harvard Law Review, 98(3): 505–591.
26. Garrow, D. J., Bearing the Cross: Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. New York: William Morrow & Co.
27. Grundfest, J. A., 1976. Citizen Participation in Broadcast Licensing Before the FCC., Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.
28. Gunnemann, L. H., 1977. The Shaping of the United Church of Christ., New York: United Church Press.
29. Horton, D., 1962. The United Church of Christ: Its Origins, Organization, and Role in the World Today., New York: Thomas Nelson & Sons.
30. Horwitz, R. B., 1989. The Irony of Regulatory Reform: The Deregulation of American Telecommunications., New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Horwitz, R. B., 1994. Judicial review of regulatory decisions: The changing criteria. Political Science Quarterly, 109(1): 133–169.
32. In re Application of Lamar Life Broadcasting Company, 14 FCC 2d 431 (1968)
33. 1970. In re Complaint Concerning Requirements for Political Broadcasts: Station WLBT- TV (April 17, 1962). FCC, 40: 333
34. 1967. Initial Decision of Hearing Examiner Jay A. Kyle. FCC, October 17 In re Application of Lamar Life Insurance Company for Renewal of License of Television Station WLBT and Auxiliary Services, Jackson, Mississippi.
35. Jaffe, L. L., 1965. Judicial Control of Administrative Action., Boston: Little, Brown.
36. Kolko, G., 1963. The Triumph of Conservatism: A Reinterpretation of American History, 1900-1916., New York: Free Press.
37. Krasnow, E. G., Longley, L. D., and Terry, H. A., 1982. The Politics of Broadcast Regulation., New York: St. Martin's Press.
38. Lamar Life Broadcasting Co. et al., 38 FCC 1143 (1965)
39. Lamar Life Broadcasting Co., 40 FCC 556 (1970)
40. Lobsenz, N. M., 1969. Everett Parker's broadcasting crusade. Columbia Journalism Review, 8(3): 30–36.
41. McChesney, R. W., 1993. Telecommunications, Mass Media, and Democracy: The Battle for the Control of U.S. Broadcasting, 1928-1935., New York: Oxford University-Press.
42. McDowell, J., and Loventhal, M., 1971. Black Politics: A Study and Annotated Bibliography of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party., San Jose: Bibliographic Information Center for the Study of Political Science.
43. McIntryre, J. S., 1979. The Hutchins Commission's search for a moral framework. Journalism History, 6(2): 54–63.
44. McIntyre, J. S., 1987. Repositioning a landmark: The Hutchins Commission and freedom of the press. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4(2): 136–160.
45. Melton, J. G., 1988-1994. The Encyclopedia of American Religions., Third Edition, Detroit: Gale Research Inc.
46. 1968. Motion For Leave to File a Brief and For Oral Argument on the Court's Review of Remand. July 26 In the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ et al. (Appellants) v. Federal Communications Commission (Appellee), Lamar Life Broadcasting Company (Intervenor).
47. Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. FCC, 359 F.2d 994 (1966)
48. Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. FCC, 425 F.2d 543 (1969)
49. 1966. Opposition to Motion to Designate Place of Hearing. FCC, December 22 In re Applications of Lamar Life Broadcasting Company For Renewal of License of Television WLBT and Auxiliary Services, Jackson, Mississippi.
50. 1964. Opposition to Petition to Intervene and to Deny Application for Renewal. FCC, May 15 In re Application of Lamar Life Broadcasting Company (WLBT) Jackson, Mississippi For Renewal of License.
51. Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. White, 296 U.S. 176 (1935)
52. 1964. Petition to Intervene and to Deny Application for Renewal. FCC, April 8 In the Matter of the Application of Lamar Life Broadcasting Company for Renewal of its License to Operate Television Station WLBT in Jackson, Mississippi.
53. Philco Corp. v. FCC, 257 F.2d 656 (D.C. Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 946 (1959).
54. Proceedings of the mass communications law section, Association of American Law Schools (1978). New York: Association of American Law Schools
55. 1964. Reply to Opposition to Petition to Intervene and to Deny Application for Renewal. FCC, June 13 In re Application of Lamar Life Broadcasting Company (WLBT) For Renewal of License.
56. Rosen, P. T., 1980. The Modern Stentors: Radio Broadcasting and the Federal Government, 1920-1934., Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
57. Rowland, W. D., Jr. 1982. The illusion of fulfillment: The broadcast reform movement. Journalism Monographs, 79: 1–41.
58. Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission, 354 F.2d 608 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 941 (1966).
59. Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 316 U.S. 4 (1942)
60. Siebert, F. S., Peterson, T., and Schramm, W., 1956. Four Theories of the Press: The Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility, and Soviet Communist Concepts of What the Press Should Be and Do., Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
61. Smythe, D. W., and Campbell, A., 1951. Los Angeles Television, May 23-29, 1951., Urbana, Ill.: National Association of Educational Broadcasters.
62. Smythe, D. W., 1952. New York Television, January 4-10. 1951., Urbana, Ill.: National Association of Educational Broadcasters.
63. Smythe, D. W., 1953a. New Haven Television, May 15-21, 1952., Urbana, Ill.: National Association of Educational Broadcasters.
64. Smythe, D. W., 1953b. Three Years of New York Television, 1951-1953., Urbana, Ill.: National Association of Educational Broadcasters.
65. Stewart, R. B., 1975. The reformation of American administrative law. Harvard Law Review, 88(8): 1667–1813.
66. Stigler, G. J., 1971. The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1): 3–21.
67. Tennessee Power Co. v. TVA, 306 U.S. 118 (1939)
68. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. August, 1965. Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ, Aaron Henry, Robert L.T. Smith, and United Church of Christ at Tougaloo (Appellants) v. Federal Communications Commission (Appellee) and Lamar Life Broadcasting Company (Intervenor), No. 19,409. Brief for Appellants.
69. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. November 3, 1965. Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ, Aaron Henry, Robert L.T. Smith, and United Church of Christ at Tougaloo (Appellants) v. Federal Communications Commission (Appellee) and Lamar Life Broadcasting Company (Intervenor), No. 19,409. Reply Brief for Appellants.
70. Werhan, K., 1992. The neoclassical revival in administrative law. Administrative Law Review, 44(3): 567–627.