Telehealth and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and narrative analysis

BMJ Open

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2017, Pages

  Kruse, Clemens Scott ^a   Krowski, Nicole ^a   Rodriguez, Blanca ^a   Tran, Lan ^a   Vela, Jackeline ^a   Brooks, Matthew ^a  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

access; home telehealth.; patient quality; patient satisfaction; quality; telecommunications; telehealth; telemedicine

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDLINE; NARRATIVE; NURSING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TELEMEDICINE; TRAVEL;

HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 85027017848     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016242     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. World Health Organization. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in Member States: report on the second global survey on eHealth: World Health Organization, 2010.
2. Finkelstein SM, Speedie SM, Potthoff S, et al. Home telehealth improves clinical outcomes at lower cost for home healthcare. Telemed J E Health 2006;12:128-36.
3. Rojas SV, Gagnon M P. A systematic review of the key indicators for assessing telehomecare cost-effectiveness. Telemed J E Health 2008;14:896-904.
4. Cleary PD. A hospitalization from hell: a patient's perspective on quality. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:33-9.
5. LaBarbera PA, Mazursky D. A Longitudinal Assessment of Consumer satisfaction/Dissatisfaction: the Dynamic Aspect of the Cognitive process. Journal of Marketing Research 1983;20:393-404.
6. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:264-9.
7. Kohler C. Narrative analysis. 30, 1993.
8. Schulz-Heik RJ, Meyer H, Mahoney L, et al. Results from a clinical yoga program for veterans: yoga via telehealth provides comparable satisfaction and health improvements to in-person yoga. BMC Complement Altern Med 2017;17:198.
9. Iqbal A, Raza A, Huang E, et al. Cost effectiveness of a novel attempt to reduce readmission after Ileostomy Creation. JSLS 2017;21:e2016.00082.
10. Müller KI, Alstadhaug KB, Bekkelund SI, et al. Acceptability, feasibility, and cost of telemedicine for nonacute headaches:a randomized study comparing video and Traditional consultations. Journal of medical Internet research 2016;18:e140.
11. Dias AE, Limongi JCP, Hsing WT, et al. Telerehabilitation in Parkinson's disease: Infuence of cognitive status. Dement Neuropsychol 2016;10:327-32.
12. Langabeer JR, Gonzalez M, Alqusairi D, et al. Telehealth-Enabled Emergency Medical Services Program reduces Ambulance transport to Urban Emergency Departments. West J Emerg Med 2016;17:713-20.
13. Hoaas H, Andreassen HK, Lien LA, et al. Adherence and factors affecting satisfaction in long-term telerehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016;16:26.
14. Jacobs JJ, Ekkelboom R, Jacobs JP, et al. Patient satisfaction with a teleradiology service in general practice. BMC Fam Pract 2016;17:17:17.
15. Bradbury A, Patrick-Miller L, Harris D, et al. Utilizing remote Real-Time videoconferencing to expand access to Cancer genetic Services in Community Practices: a Multicenter Feasibility Study. J Med Internet Res 2016;18:e23.
16. AlAzab R, Khader Y. Telenephrology application in rural and remote Areas of Jordan: benefts and impact on quality of life. Rural Remote Health 2016;16.
17. Fields BG, Behari PP, McCloskey S, et al. Remote Ambulatory Management of Veterans with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Sleep 2016;39:501-.
18. Georgsson M, Staggers N. Quantifying usability: an evaluation of a diabetes mHealth system on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction metrics with associated user characteristics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016;23:5-11.
19. Polinski JM, Barker T, Gagliano N, et al. PatientsSatisfaction with and preference for Telehealth Visits. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31:269-75.
20. Levy CE, Silverman E, Jia H, et al. Effects of physical therapy delivery via home video telerehabilitation on functional and health-related quality of life outcomes. J Rehabil Res Dev 2015;52:361-70.
21. Holmes M, Clark S. Technology-enabled care services: novel method of managing liver disease. Gastrointestinal Nursing 2014;12:S22-S27.
22. Levy N, Moynihan V Nilo A, et al. The Mobile insulin titration intervention (MITI) for insulin glargine titration in an Urban, Low-Income Population: randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc 2015;4:e31.
23. Moin T, Ertl K, Schneider J, et al. Women veterans' experience with a web-based diabetes prevention program: a qualitative study to inform future practice. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e127.
24. Cottrell E, Cox T, O'Connell P, et al. Patient and professional user experiences of simple telehealth for hypertension, medication reminders and smoking cessation: a service evaluation. BMJ Open 2015;5:e007270.
25. Tabak M, Brusse-Keizer M, van der Valk P et al. A telehealth program for self-management of COPD exacerbations and promotion of an active lifestyle: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2014;9:935.
26. Kim H, Spaulding R, Werkowitch M, et al. Costs of multidisciplinary parenteral nutrition care provided at a distance via mobile tablets. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2014;38:50S-7.
27. Cancela J, Pastorino M, Tzallas AT, et al. Wearability assessment of a wearable system for Parkinson's disease remote monitoring based on a body area network of sensors. Sensors 2014;14:17235-55.
28. Casey M, Hayes PS, Glynn F et al. Patients' experiences of using a smartphone application to increase physical activity: the SMART MOVE qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2014;64:e500-e508.
29. Tsai CH, Kuo YM, Uei SL, et al. Infuences of satisfaction with telecare and family trust in older taiwanese people. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014;11:1359-68.
30. Oliveira TC, Bayer S, Gonçalves L, et al. Telemedicine in Alentejo. Telemed J E Health 2014;20:90-3.
31. Minatodani DE, Chao PJ, Berman SJ, et al. Home telehealth: facilitators, barriers, and impact of nurse support among high-risk dialysis patients. Telemed J E Health 2013;19:573-8.
32. Akter S, D'Ambra J, Ray P, et al. Modelling the impact of mHealth service quality on satisfaction, continuance and quality of life. Behav Inf Technol 2013;32:1225-41.
33. Hung YC, Bauer J, Horsley P, et al. Patient satisfaction with nutrition services amongst Cancer patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation: a comparison of usual and extended care. J Hum Nutr Diet 2014;27 Suppl 2:333-8.
34. Buis LR, Hirzel L, Turske SA, et al. Use of a text message program to raise type 2 diabetes risk awareness and promote health behavior change (part I): assessment of participant reach and adoption. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e282.
35. Houser SH, Ray MN, Maisiak R, et al. Telephone follow-up in primary care: can interactive voice response calls work? Stud Health Technol Inform 2013;192:112.
36. Kairy D, Tousignant M, Leclerc N, et al. The patient's perspective of in-home telerehabilitation physiotherapy services following total knee arthroplasty. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013;10:3998-4011.
37. Bishop TF, Press MJ, Mendelsohn JL, et al. Electronic communication improves access, but barriers to its widespread adoption remain. Health Aff 2013;32:1361-7.
38. Piette JD, Marinec N, Gallegos-Cabriales EC, et al. Spanish-speaking patients' engagement in interactive voice response (IVR) support calls for chronic disease self-management: data from three countries. J Telemed Telecare 2013;19:89-94.
39. Gund A, Sjöqvist BA, Wigert H, et al. A randomized controlled study about the use of eHealth in the home health care of premature infants. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013;13:1.
40. ter Huurne ED, Postel MG, de Haan HA, et al. Web-based treatment program using intensive therapeutic contact for patients with eating disorders: before-after study. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e12.
41. Chun YJ, Patterson PE. A usability gap between older adults and younger adults on interface design of an Internet-based telemedicine system. Work 2012;41 Suppl 1:349-52.
42. Lee AC, Pulantara W, Barbara Sargent PT, et al. The VISYTER telerehabilitation system for globalizing physical therapy consultation: issues and challenges for telehealth implementation. Journal of Physical Therapy Education 2012;26:90.
43. Saifu HN, Asch SM, Goetz MB, et al. Evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C telemedicine clinics. Am J Manag Care 2012;18:207-12.
44. Lua PL, Neni WS. Feasibility and acceptability of mobile epilepsy educational system (MEES) for people with epilepsy in Malaysia. Telemed J E Health 2012;18:777-84.
45. Finkelstein SM, MacMahon K, Lindgren BR, et al. Development of a remote monitoring satisfaction survey and its use in a clinical trial with lung transplant recipients. J Telemed Telecare 2012;18:42-6.
46. Gibson KL, Coulson H, Miles R, et al. Conversations on telemental health: listening to remote and rural first nations communities. Rural Remote Health 2011;11:1656-74.
47. Doorenbos AZ, Eaton LH, Haozous E, et al. Satisfaction with telehealth for Cancer support groups in rural american indian and Alaska native communities. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2010;14:765-70.
48. Breen R Murphy K, Browne G, et al. Formative evaluation of a telemedicine model for delivering clinical neurophysiology services part I: utility, technical performance and service provider perspective. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2010;10:1-8.
49. Everett J, Kerr D. Telehealth as adjunctive therapy in insulin pump treated patients: a pilot study. Practical Diabetes International 2010;27:9-10.
50. Gardner-Bonneau D. Remote patient monitoring: a human factors Assessment. Biomed Instrum Technol 2010;44:71-7.
51. Schein RM, Schmeler MR, Saptono A, et al. Patient satisfaction with telerehabilitation assessments for wheeled mobility and seating. Assist Technol 2010;22:215-22.
52. Kruse CS, Kothman K, Anerobi K, et al. Adoption factors of the Electronic Health Record: a Systematic Review. JMIR Med Inform 2016;4:e19.
53. Kruse CS, Mileski M, Alaytsev V et al. Adoption factors associated with electronic health record among long-term care facilities: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2015;5:e006615.
54. Luna R, Rhine E, Myhra M, et al. Cyber threats to health information systems: a systematic review. Technol Health Care 2016;24:1-9.
55. Kruse CS, Mileski M, Moreno J, et al. Mobile health solutions for the aging populations systematic narrative analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2017;23:1-13.
56. de Jong CC, Ros WJ, Schrijvers G, et al. The effects on health behavior and health outcomes of Internet-based asynchronous communication between health providers and patients with a chronic condition: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e19.
57. Young LB, Foster L, Silander A, et al. Home telehealth: patient satisfaction, program functions, and challenges for the care coordinator. J Gerontol Nurs 2011;37:38-46.
58. U.S. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. HCAHPS: patient's perspectives of care surve. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality-initiatives-patient-assessment-instruments.html (accessed 30 Apr 2017).
59. Cambridge Dictionary Effective. dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/English/effective (accessed 30 Apr 2017).
60. Dictionary.com Effcient. www.dictionary.com/browse/effcient (accessed 30 Apr2017).