An m-Health system for education and motivation in cardiac rehabilitation: the experience of HeartCycle guided exercise

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 303-316

  Salvi, Dario ^a   Ottaviano, Manuel ^a   Muuraiskangas, Salla ^b   Martínez Romero, Alvaro ^c   Vera Muñoz, Cecilia ^a   Triantafyllidis, Andreas ^d   Cabrera Umpiérrez, Maria Fernanda ^a   Arredondo Waldmeyer, Maria Teresa ^a   Skobel, Erik ^e   Knackstedt, Christian ^f,g   Liedes, Hilkka ^b   Honka, Anita ^b   Luprano, Jean ^h   Cleland, John G F ⁱ   Stut, Wim ^j   Deighan, Carolyn ^k  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^d ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^e Clinic for Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation   (Germany)

^f RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^g MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^h CSEM   (Switzerland)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^j PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^k NHS LOTHIAN   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

cardiac rehabilitation; coronary artery diseases; education and motivation; m Health

Indexed keywords

PAITRAP PEPTIDE; PEPTIDE FRAGMENT; UROKINASE;

ADULT; AGED; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART REHABILITATION; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CARE; TELEMEDICINE;

ADULT; AGED; CARDIAC REHABILITATION; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; SELF CARE; TELEMEDICINE; UROKINASE-TYPE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR;

EID: 85026843486     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: 17581109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1357633X17697501     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Fact Sheet number 317, World Health Organization, 2013. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/
2. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Amer J Med 2004; 116(10): 682–692.
3. Harb BM, Wonisch M, Brandt D, Long-term risk factor management after inpatient cardiac rehabilitation by means of a structured post-care programme. Eur J Cardiovasc Prevent Rehab 2011; 18(6): 843–849.
4. O’Connor GT, Buring JE, Yusuf S, An overview of randomized trials of rehabilitation with exercise after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1989; 80(2): 234–244.
5. Heran BS, Chen J, Ebrahim S, Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Library 2011; 7: 7–7.
6. Oliveira J, Ribeiro F, Gomes H. Effects of a home-based cardiac rehabilitation program on the physical activity levels of patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiopulm Rehab Prevent 2008; 28(6): 392–396.
7. Perk J, Gohlke H, Hellemans I, Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, Berlin: Springer, 2007.
8. Thomas RJ. Cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs a raft for the rapids: Why have we missed the boat? Circulation 2007; 116(15): 1644–1646.
9. Jolly K, Taylor R, Lip G, The Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM). home-based compared with hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation in a multi-ethnic population: cost-effectiveness and patient adherence. Health Technol Assessment 2007; 11(35): 1–118.
10. Jolly K, Taylor RS, Lip GY, Home-based cardiac rehabilitation compared with centre-based rehabilitation and usual care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2006; 111(3): 343–351.
11. Reiter H and Maglaveras N. HeartCycle: Compliance and effectiveness in HF and CAD closed-loop management. In 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2009), Minneapolis, MN, pp. 299–302
12. Maglaveras N and Reiter H. Towards closed-loop personal health systems in cardiology: The HeartCycle approach. In 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2011), Boston, MA, pp. 892–895
13. Meneu T, Martínez-Romero A, Martínez-Millana A et al. An integrated advanced communication and coaching platform for enabling personalized management of chronic cardiovascular diseases. In 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2011), Boston, MA, pp. 1563–1566
14. Gasser R, Brodbeck D, Degen M et al. Persuasiveness of a mobile lifestyle coaching application using social facilitation. In Proceedings of Persuasive Technology: First International Conference on Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being (PERSUASIVE 2006), Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 18–19 May 2006. Berlin: Springer, pp. 27–38
15. op den Akker H, Klaassen R, op den Akker R et al. Opportunities for smart and tailored activity coaching. In Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS 2013), pp. 546–547
16. Fioravanti A, Fico G, Salvi D, Automatic messaging for improving patients engagement in diabetes management: an exploratory study. Med Biol Eng Comput 2015; 53(12): 1285–1294.
17. Hermens H, op den Akker H, Tabak M, Personalized coaching systems to support healthy behavior in people with chronic conditions. J Electromyog Kinesiol 2014; 24(6): 815–826.
18. Chatterjee S, Price A. Healthy living with persuasive technologies: framework, issues, and challenges. J Amer Med Informat Assoc 2009; 16(2): 171–178.
19. Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med 2013; 10(1): e1001362–e1001362.
20. Widmer RJ, Allison T, Lerman L, The augmentation of usual cardiac rehabilitation with an online and smartphone-based program improves cardiovascular risk factors and reduces rehospitalizations. J Amer Coll Cardiol 2014; 63(12): A1296–A1296.
21. Worringham C, Rojek A, Stewart I. Development and feasibility of a smartphone, ECG and GPS based system for remotely monitoring exercise in cardiac rehabilitation. PLoS One 2011; 6(2): e14669–e14669.
22. Antypas K, Wangberg SC. An internet- and mobile-based tailored intervention to enhance maintenance of physical activity after cardiac rehabilitation: Short-term results of a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16(3): e77–e77.
23. Varnfield M, Karunanithi M, Lee CK, Smartphone-based home care model improved use of cardiac rehabilitation in postmyocardial infarction patients: results from a randomised controlled trial. Heart 2014; 100: 1770–1779.
24. Dale L, Whittaker R, Jiang Y, Improving coronary heart disease self-management using mobile technologies (Text4Heart): a randomised controlled trial protocol. Trials 2014; 15(1): 71–71.
25. Dale LP, Whittaker R, Jiang Y, Text message and internet support for coronary heart disease self-management: results from the Text4Heart randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17(10): e23700–e23700.
26. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013.
27. Williams MA, Balady GJ. Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs. The AHA Guidelines and Scientific Statements Handbook, New York: John Wiley & Son, 2009, pp. 91–107.
28. NHS Lothian Health Board. Heart Manual (Post Myocardial Infarction Edition), Edinburgh, UK: Lothian Health Board, 2012.
29. Cooper A, Reimann R, Cronin D. About face: the essentials of interaction design, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Son, 2007.
30. Oinas-Kukkonen H, Harjumaa M. Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Commun Assoc Inform Syst 2009; 24(1): 28–28.
31. Martin RC. Agile software development: principles, patterns, and practices, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR, 2003.
32. Villalba E, Salvi D, Ottaviano M, Wearable and mobile system to manage remotely heart failure. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed 2009; 13(6): 990–996.
33. Karppinen P, Oinas-Kukkonen H, Alahäivälä T, Persuasive user experiences of a health behavior change support system: a 12-month study for prevention of metabolic syndrome. Int J Med Informat 2016; 96: 51–61.
34. Kelders SM, Kok RN, Ossebaard HC, Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14(6): e152–e152.
35. Sadasivam RS, Delaughter K, Crenshaw K, Development of an interactive, web-delivered system to increase provider–patient engagement in smoking cessation. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13(4): e87–e87.
36. Banos O, Garcia R, Holgado-Terriza JA, mhealthdroid: a novel framework for agile development of mobile health applications. In: Ambient Assisted Living and Daily Activities, Berlin: Springer, 2014, pp. 91–98.
37. Ottaviano M, Vera-Munoz C, Arredondo MT et al. A system to promote self-behaviors of patients with coronary heart disease. In 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2010), Buenos Aires, Argentina. IEEE, pp. 3843–3846
38. Vera-Muñoz C, Arredondo MT, Peinado I, Results of the usability and acceptance evaluation of a cardiac rehabilitation system. In: Human–Computer Interaction. Users and Applications, Berlin: Springer, 2011, pp. 219–225.
39. Salvi D, Gorman J, Arredondo MT, A platform for the development of patient applications in the domain of personalized health. Comput Meth Programs Biomed 2012; 107(1): 45–52.
40. Runtti H, Honka A, Chouvarda I et al. Biosignal processing methods to guide cardiac patients to perform safe and beneficial exercise for rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the VII International Workshop on Biosignal Interpretation (BSI 2012), Como, Italy, pp. 181–184
41. Conner M, Norman P. Predicting Health Behaviour: Research and Practice with Social Cognition Models, Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, 2005.
42. Fogg BJ. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Ubiquity 2002; December 2002: 89–120.
43. Skobel E, Knackstedt C, Martinez-Romero A, Internet-based training of coronary artery patients: the Heart Cycle trial. Heart Vessels 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI:10. 1007/s00380-016-0897-8.
44. Members AF, Perk J, Backer GD, European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 1635–1701.
45. Williams JR. The declaration of helsinki and public health. Bull WHO 2008; 86(8): 650–652.
46. Cho J. The impact of post-adoption beliefs on the continued use of health apps. Int J Med Informat 2016; 87: 75–83.
47. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart 1989; 13(3): 319–340.
48. Gagnon MP, Orruno E, Asua J, Using a modified technology acceptance model to evaluate healthcare professionals’ adoption of a new telemonitoring system. Telemed e-Health 2012; 18(1): 54–59.
49. Chang YZ, Ko CY, Hsiao CJ, Understanding the determinants of implementing telehealth systems: A combined model of the theory of planned behavior and the technology acceptance model. J Appl Sci 2015; 15(2): 277–277.
50. Mæland JG, Havik OE. Measuring cardiac health knowledge. Scand J Caring Sci 1987; 1(1): 23–31.
51. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The consort statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2001; 1(1): 2–2.
52. Scalvini S, Zanelli E, Comini L, Home-based exercise rehabilitation with telemedicine following cardiac surgery. J Telemed Telecare 2009; 15(6): 297–301.
53. Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the whole system demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12(1): 220–220.
54. Thorup C, Hansen J, Grønkjær M, Cardiac patients’ walking activity determined by a step counter in cardiac telerehabilitation: Data from the intervention arm of a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18(4): e69–e69.