DECORRELATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE RENDERING OF APPARENT SOUND SOURCE WIDTH IN 3D AUDIO DISPLAYS

Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Audio Effects, DAFx

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 280-284

  Potard, Guillaume ^a   Burnett, Ian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC GENERATORS; AUDIO ACOUSTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

3D AUDIO; APPARENT SOURCE; DE CORRELATIONS; DECORRELATION TECHNIQUE; DECORRELATIONS; DIRECT IMPACT; INTERAURAL CROSS-CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS; SOUND SOURCE; SPATIAL EXTENT; TIME AND FREQUENCIES;

THREE DIMENSIONAL DISPLAYS;

EID: 85026667188     PISSN: 24136700     EISSN: 24136689     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. J. Blauert, Spatial Hearing, MIT Press, Revised edition, 1996.
2. ISO/IEC standard, 14496-1 Information technology - Coding of audio-visual objects-Part 1: Systems, 2000.
3. E. D. Scheirer, “AudioBIFS: Describing audio scenes with the MPEG-4 multimedia standard, ” IEEE Trans. on Multimedia 1, no. 3, pp. 237-250, 1999.
4. G. Potard, J. Spille, “Study of Sound Source Shape and Wideness in Virtual and Real Auditory Displays, ” presented at the 114th AES Convention, Amsterdam, March 2003, preprint 5766.
5. L. Beranek, “Concert and opera halls: How they sound, ” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1996
6. M. Gerzon, “Signal processing for simulating realistic stereo images, ” 93rd AES convention, New York, 1-4 October, Preprint 3424, 1992.
7. G. S. Kendall, “The Decorrelation of Audio Signals and Its Impact on Spatial Imagery, ” Computer Music J., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 71-87, 1995
8. K. Kurozumi, K. Ohgushi, “The relationship between the cross-correlation coefficient of two-channel acoustic signals and sound image quality, ” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1726-1733, Dec. 1983.
9. G. Potard, I. Burnett, “A study on sound source apparent shape and wideness, ” Proc. of Int. Conference on Auditory Displays (ICAD), Boston, USA, 6-9 July 2003, pp. 25-28.
10. H. Lehnert, “Auditory Spatial Impression, ” in Proc. of the 12th Audio Eng. Soc. Conf., Copenhagen, Denmark, June 1993.
11. D. R. Begault, 3-D sound for virtual reality and multimedia, Academic Press Professional, San Diego, USA, 1994.
12. M. Morimoto, “The Relation between Spatial Impression and The Precedence Effect, ” in Proc. of the ICAD Conf., Kyoto, Japan, July 2002.
13. E. G. Boring, “Auditory theory with special reference to intensity, volume, and localization, ” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 157-188, 1926.
14. D. R. Perrott and T. N. Buell, “Judgments of sound volume: effects of signal duration, level, and interaural characteristics on the perceived extensity of boradband noise, ” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 1413-1417, Nov. 1982.
15. M. Tohyama, H. Susuki, Y. Ando, The nature and technology of acoustic space, Academic Press, 1995.
16. J. M. Potter, F. A. Bilsen and J. Raatgever, “Frequency dependence of spaciousness, ” Acta Acoustica, vol. 3, pp. 417-427, Oct. 1995.
17. R. Mason, Elicitation and measuremnt of auditory spatial attibutes in reproduced sound, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Surrey, Feb. 2002.
18. www.cycling74.com
19. Y. W. Liu, J. O. Smith III, “Perceptually similar orthogonal sounds and applications to multichannel acoustic echo cancelling, ” in Proc. of the 22nd Audio Eng. Soc. Conf., Espoo, Finland, 2002.
20. D. G. Malham, “Spherical harmonic coding of sound objects - the ambisonic 'O' format, ” in Proc. of the 19th Audio Eng. Soc. Conf., Schloss Elmau, Germany, 1999.
21. D. Menzies, “W-panning and O-format, tools for spatialisation, ” in Proc. of ICAD Conf., Kyoto, Japan, July 2002.
22. D. G. Malham, “3-D soound spatialization using Ambisonics techniques, ” Computer Music J., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 58-70, Winter 1995.
23. CHESS Webpage, http://www.whisper.elec.uow.edu.au/CHESS/