Problematic assessment of the impact of vaporized nicotine product initiation in the United States

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 264-265

  Soneji, Samir ^a   Sung, Hai Yen ^b   Primack, Brian ^c   Pierce, John P ^d   Sargent, James ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDE; ALPHA TOCOPHEROL; CIGARETTE SMOKE; FORMALDEHYDE; NICOTINE;

CARDIOVASCULAR FUNCTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPITHELIUM CELL; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HARM REDUCTION; HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT; HEALTH SURVEY; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; IMMUNE RESPONSE; INFLAMMATION; LETTER; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NOSE EPITHELIUM; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SMOKING; UNITED STATES; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE; TOBACCO;

ELECTRONIC NICOTINE DELIVERY SYSTEMS; NICOTINE; PUBLIC HEALTH; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85026604458     PISSN: 14622203     EISSN: 1469994X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw232     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Levy DT, Borland R, Villanti AC, et al. The application of a decision-theoretic model to estimate the public health impact of vaporized nicotine product initiation in the United States [published online ahead of print July 14, 2016]. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;19(2):149-159
2. Pielke RA, Conant RT. Best practices in prediction for decisionmaking: lessons from the atmospheric and earth sciences. Ecology. 2003;84(6):1351-1358. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1351:BPIPF D]2.0.CO;2
3. Tetlock P, Gardner D. Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction. New York, NY: Crown; 2015
4. Jensen RP, Luo W, Pankow JF, Strongin RM, Peyton DH. Hidden formaldehyde in e-cigarette aerosols. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(4):392-394. doi:10.1056/NEJMc1413069
5. Bhatnagar A. E-cigarettes and cardiovascular disease risk: evaluation of evidence, policy implications, and recommendations. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2016;10(7):1-10. doi:10.1007/s12170-016-0505-6
6. Carnevale R, Sciarretta S, Violi F, et al. Acute impact of tobacco versus electronic cigarette smoking on oxidative stress and vascular function. Chest. 2016;150(3):606-612. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.04.012
7. Martin EM, Clapp PW, Rebuli ME, et al. E-cigarette use results in suppression of immune and inflammatory-response genes in nasal epithelial cells similar to cigarette smoke. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2016;311(1):L135-L144. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00170.2016