An integrated perspective on the assessment of technologies: INTEGRATE-HTA

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 544-551

  Wahlster, Philip ^a   Brereton, Louise ^b   Burns, Jacob ^c   Hofmann, Björn ^d   Mozygemba, Kati ^a   Oortwijn, Wija ^e   Pfadenhauer, Lisa ^c   Polus, Stephanie ^c   Rehfuess, Eva ^c   Schilling, Imke ^a   Van Der Wilt, Gert Jan ^f   Gerhardus, Ansgar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^e ECORYS Netherlands   (Netherlands)

^f RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Complex interventions; Decision making; Health technology assessment; Logic model; Stakeholder involvement

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CIRCUITS; DECISION MAKING; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS; COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT; ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS; EUROPEAN RESEARCH PROJECT; EVIDENCE ASSESSMENTS; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS; LOGIC MODELING; STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LOGIC; MODEL; CULTURAL DIVERSITY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HOME CARE; JURISPRUDENCE; METHODOLOGY; MORALITY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PATIENT CARE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CULTURAL DIVERSITY; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; JURISPRUDENCE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MORALS; PALLIATIVE CARE; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; RESEARCH DESIGN; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 85026503517     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462317000484     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA). HTA definition. 2016. http://www. eunethta. eu/about-us/faq#t287n73 (accessed December 5, 2016)
2. Medical Research Council. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: New guidance. United Kingdom: MRC; 2008
3. Horton R. Offline: The error of our health technology assessment ways. Lancet. 2013; 382: 1318
4. Benton V, Stewart T. Multiple criteria decision analysis-An integrated approach. New York: Springer US; 2002
5. Wahlster P, Goetghebeur M, Kriza C, et al. Balancing costs and benefits at different stages of medical innovation: A systematic review of Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). BMC Health Serv Res. 2015; 15: 262
6. Wahlster P, Goetghebeur M, Schaller S, Kriza C, Kolominsky-Rabas P, National Leading-Edge Cluster Medical Technologies 'Medical Valley EMN'. Exploring the perspectives and preferences for HTA across German healthcare stakeholders using a multi-criteria assessment of a pulmonary heart sensor as a case study. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015; 13: 24
7. Brereton L, Wahlster P, Lysdahl KB, et al. Integrated assessment of home based palliative care with and without reinforced caregiver support: A demonstration of INTEGRATE-HTA methodological guidances. 2016. http://www. integrate-hta. eu/downloads/ (accessed December 5, 2016)
8. Lysdahl KB, Mozygemba K, Burns J, et al. Guidance for assessing effectiveness, economic aspects, ethical aspects, socio-cultural aspects and legal aspects in complex technologies 2016. http://www. integrate-hta. eu/downloads/ (accessed December 5, 2016)
9. Pfadenhauer L, Rohwer A, Burns J, et al. Guidance for the assessment of context and implementation in health technology assessments (HTA) and systematic reviews of complex interventions: The context and implementation of complex interventions (CICI) framework. 2016. http://www. integrate-hta. eu/downloads/ (accessed December 5, 2016)
10. Booth A, Noyes J, Flemming K, et al. Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions 2016. http://www. integrate-hta. eu/downloads/ (accessed December 5, 2016)
11. Rohwer A, Booth A, Pfadenhauer L, et al. Guidance on the use of logic models in health technology assessments of complex interventions. 2016. http://www. integrate-hta. eu/downloads/ (accessed December 5, 2016)
12. Van Hoorn R, Tummers M, Kievit W, Van der Wilt GJ. Guidance for the assessment of treatment moderation and patients' preferences. 2016. http://www. integrate-hta. eu/downloads/ (accessed December 5, 2016)
13. Wahlster P, Brereton L, Burns J, et al. Integrated assessment of complex health technologies-The INTEGRATE-HTA Model. 2016. http://www. integrate-hta. eu/downloads/ (accessed December 5, 2016)
14. Brereton L, Ingleton C, Gardiner C, et al. Lay and professional stakeholder involvement in scoping palliative care issues: Methods used in seven European countries. Palliat Med. 2017; 31: 181192
15. Squires JE, Valentine JC, Grimshaw JM. Systematic reviews of complex interventions: Framing the review question. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66: 1215-1222
16. Goetghebeur MM, Wagner M, Khoury H, et al. Evidence and value: Impact on DEcisionMaking-the EVIDEM framework and potential applications. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8: 270
17. Lampe K, Makela M, Garrido MV, et al. The HTA Core Model: A novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009; 25 (Suppl 2): 9-20
18. International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (IANHTA). Glossary. 2015. http://www. inahta. org/Glossary (accessed December 5, 2016)
19. The Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual 2014 Edition. Australia: Joanna Briggs Institute, 2014
20. Rohwer A, Pfadenhauer L, Burns J, et al. Logic models help make sense of complexity in systematic reviews and health technology assessments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 83: 37-47
21. Polus S, Pfadenhauer L, Brereton L, et al. A consultation guide for assessing the applicability of health technologies-a case study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 [This issue. ]
22. DeGroot MH. Reaching a consensus. J Am Stat Assoc. 1974; 69: 118-121
23. Lysdahl KB, Hofmann B. Complex health care interventions: Characteristics relevant for ethical analysis in health technology assessment. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2016; 12: Doc01
24. Bond K, Weeks L. Using the INTEGRATE-HTA guidance: Experience from CADTH. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 [This issue. ]