Learning and assessment: a long and winding road?

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 309-316

  Wiliam, Dylan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85026239704     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2017.1338520     Document Type: Editorial

References (28)

1. ACT. (2017). The ACT test for students. Retrieved June 1, 2017, from http://www.act.org/content/act/en/products-and-services/the-act.html
2. Angier, R. P., MacPhail, A. H., Rogers, D. C., Stone, C. J., & Brigham, C. C., (1926). Scholastic aptitude tests:A manual for the use of schools. New York, NY:College Entrance Examination Board.
3. Baird, J.-A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G., (2017). Assessment and learning:Fields apart. Assessment in Education:Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350.
4. Black, H., (1986). Assessment for learning. In D. L., Nuttall (Ed.), Assessing educational achievement (pp. 7–18). London, UK:Falmer Press.
5. Blodgett, H. C., (1929). The effect of the introduction of reward upon the maze performance of rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4(8), 113–134.
6. Bloom, B. S., (1968). Mastery learning evaluation comment (Vol. 1, no 2, May). Los Angeles, CA:University of California at Los Angeles Center for the Study of Evaluation of Instructional Programs.
7. Bloom, B. S., (1969). Some theoretical issues relating to educational evaluation. In R. W., Tyler (Ed.), Educational evaluation:New roles, new means:The 68th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (part II) (Vol. 68(2), pp. 26–50). Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
8. Carver, R. P., (1974). Two dimensions of tests:Psychometric and edumetric. American Psychologist, 29(7), 512–518.10.1037/h0036782
9. Cherryholmes, C. H., (1988). Construct validity and the discourses of research. American Journal of Education, 96, 421–457.10.1086/443901
10. Cronbach, L. J., (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.10.1037/h0043943
11. Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L., (1970). How we should measure “change”:Or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.10.1037/h0029382
12. Dorans, N. J., (1999). Correspondence between ACT and SAT I scores. Princeton, NJ:Educational Testing Service.
13. Flyvbjerg, B., (2001). Making social science matter:Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810503
14. Foucault, M., (1977). Discipline and punish (A. M., Sheridan-Smith, Trans.). Harmondsworth:Penguin.
15. Goddard, H. H., (Ed.). (1916). The development of intelligence in children (the Binet-Simon scale). Baltimore, MD:Williams & Wilkins.
16. Goddard, H. H., (1917). The place of intelligence in modern warfare. United States Naval Medical Bulletin, 2, 283–289.
17. Hölder, O. L., (1901/1996). Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass [The axioms of quantity and the theory of measurement]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 235–252.
18. James, M., (1992, April). Assessment for learning. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
19. Lemann, N., (1999). The big test:The secret history of the American meritocracy. New York, NY:Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
20. Mittler, P., (Ed.). (1973). Assessment for learning in the mentally handicapped. Edinburgh:Churchill Livingstone.
21. Nagel, T., (1989). The view from nowhwere. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
22. Powers, D. E., & Rock, D. A., (1999). Effects of coaching on SAT I:Reasoning test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 93–118.10.1111/jedm.1999.36.issue-2
23. Scriven, M., (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W., Tyler, R. M., Gagné, & M., Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 39–83). Chicago, IL:Rand McNally.
24. Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A., (2015). Learning versus performance:An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 176–199.10.1177/1745691615569000
25. Stanley, J. C., (1971). Reliability. In R. L., Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 356–442). Washington, DC:American Council on Education.
26. Tolman, E. C., & Honzik, C. H., (1930). Introduction and removal of reward, and maze performance in rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4, 257–275.
27. Varon, E. J., (1936). Alfred Binet’s concept of intelligence. Psychological Review, 43, 32–58.10.1037/h0060709
28. Zenderland, L., (1998). Measuring minds:Henry Herbert Goddard and the origins of American intelligence testing. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.