An interview with Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva: Insight into improving the efficiency of the publication process

North American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 325-338

  Da Silva, Jaime A Teixeira ^a   Shaughnessy, Michael F ^a  

^a EASTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85025831049     PISSN: 15277143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Al-Khatib, A., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016). Stings, hoaxes and irony breach the trust inherent in scientific publishing. Publishing Research Quarterly, 32(3): 208-219. DOI: 10.1007/s12109-016-9473-4.
2. Al-Khatib, A., Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017). Threats to the survival of the author-pays-journal to publish model. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(1): 64-70. DOI: 10.1007/s12109-016-9486-z.
3. Dadkhah, M., Maliszewski, T., Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016) Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 12(3): 353-362. DOI: 10.1007/s12024-016-9785-x
4. Larivière V, Haustein S, Mongeon P (2015) The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6): e0127502. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
5. Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2013a). Predatory publishing: a quantitative assessment, the Predatory Score. The Asian and Australasian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, 7(Special Issue 1): 21-34.
6. Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2013b). Responsibilities and rights of authors, peer reviewers, editors and publishers: a status quo inquiry and assessment. The Asian and Australasian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, 7(Special Issue 1): 6-15.
7. Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2013c). The Thomson Reuters Impact Factor: critical questions that scientists should be asking. The Asian and Australasian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, 7(Special Issue 1): 81-83.
8. Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016a). On the abuse of online submission systems, fake peer reviews and editor-created accounts. Persona y Bioética, 20(2): 151-158. DOI: 10.5294/PEBI.2016.20.2.3
9. Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016b). Science watchdogs. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(3): 13-15. DOI: 10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3p13
10. Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017a). Fake peer reviews, fake identities, fake accounts, fake data: beware! AME Medical Journal 2: 28. DOI: 10.21037/amj.2017.02.10
11. Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017b). Nested self-citation: the citation of a paper's least divisible unit. Scientometrics (in press) DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2249-6
12. Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Bernès, S. (2017). Clarivate Analytics: continued omnia vanitas impact factor culture. Science and Engineering Ethics (in press) DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9873-7
13. Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J. (2017). Excessively long editorial decisions and excessively long publication times by journals: causes, risks, consequences, and proposed solutions. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(1): 101-108. DOI: 10.1007/s12109-016-9489-9
14. Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J. (2016). Multiple authorship in scientific manuscripts: ethical challenges, ghost and guest/gift authorship, and the cultural/disciplinary perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5): 1457-1472. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3
15. Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Katavić, V. (2016). Free editors and peers: Squeezing the lemon dry. Ethics & Bioethics, 6(3-4): 203-209. DOI: 10.1515/ebce-2016-0011
16. Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Memon, A. R. (2017). CiteScore: A cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric? Scientometrics (in press) DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2250-0