Spatial covariance between ecosystem services and biodiversity pattern at a national scale (France)

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 82, Issue , 2017, Pages 574-586

  Morelli, Federico ^a,b   Jiguet, Frederic ^c   Sabatier, Rodolphe ^a   Dross, Camille ^a   Princé, Karine ^a,c,d   Tryjanowski, Piotr ^e   Tichit, Muriel ^a  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^b CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^c MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^e POZNA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

Bird community; Ecosystem services; Evolutionary distinctiveness; Functional diversity; Multifunctionality; Spatial mismatch; Taxonomic diversity

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIRDS; CROPS; CULTIVATION; ECOLOGY;

BIRD COMMUNITIES; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; EVOLUTIONARY DISTINCTIVENESS; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; MULTIFUNCTIONALITY; SPATIAL MISMATCH; TAXONOMIC DIVERSITY;

ECOSYSTEMS;

BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CROP PRODUCTION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FUNCTIONAL ROLE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TAXONOMY;

FRANCE;

AVES;

EID: 85025805076     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.036     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. AGRESTE, La statistique, l’évaluation et la prospective agricole in France. 2014 (WWW Document).
2. Andersen, E., Baldock, D., Bennett, H., Beaufoy, G., Bignal, E.M., Brouwer, F., Elbersen, B., Eiden, G., Godeschalk, F., Jones, G., McCracken, D.I., Nieuwenhuizen, W., Van Eupen, M., Hennekens, S., Zervas, G., Developing a High Nature Value Indicator., 2003, Report for the European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
3. Anderson, B.J., Armsworth, P.R., Eigenbrod, F., Thomas, C.D., Gillings, S., Heinemeyer, A., Roy, D.B., Gaston, K.J., Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities. J. Appl. Ecol. 46 (2009), 888–896, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01666.x.
4. Andrew, M.E., Wulder, M. a., Nelson, T. a., Coops, N.C., Spatial data, analysis approaches, and information needs for spatial ecosystem service assessments: a review. GIScience Remote Sens. 52 (2015), 344–373, 10.1080/15481603.2015.1033809.
5. Balmford, A., Bruner, A., Cooper, P., Costanza, R., Farber, S., Green, R.E., Jenkins, M., Jefferiss, P., Jessamy, V., Madden, J., Munro, K., Myers, N., Naeem, S., Paavola, J., Rayment, M., Rosendo, S., Roughgarden, J., Trumper, K., Turner, R.K., Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297 (2002), 950–953.
6. Barnaud, C., Antona, M., Deconstructing ecosystem services: uncertainties and controversies around a socially constructed concept. Geoforum 56 (2014), 113–123, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.07.003.
7. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Eigen and S4 – R Package. 2014.
8. Bennett, E.M., Cramer, W., Begossi, A., Cundill, G., Díaz, S., Egoh, B.N., Geijzendorffer, I.R., Krug, C.B., Lavorel, S., Lazos, E., Lebel, L., Martín-López, B., Meyfroidt, P., Mooney, H.A., Nel, J.L., Pascual, U., Payet, K., Harguindeguy, N.P., Peterson, G.D., Prieur-Richard, A.-H.H., Reyers, B., Roebeling, P., Seppelt, R., Solan, M., Tschakert, P., Tscharntke, T., Turner, B.L.B., Verburg, P.H., Viglizzo, E.F., White, P.C.L., Woodward, G., Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14 (2015), 76–85, 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.007.
9. Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D., Hill, D.A., Bird Census Techniques (Google eBook). 1992, Academic Press.
10. Bolker, B.M., Brooks, M.E., Clark, C.J., Geange, S.W., Poulsen, J.R., Stevens, M.H.H., White, J.-S.S., Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24 (2009), 127–135, 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008.
11. Bossard, M., Feranec, J., Othael, J., CORINE land cover technical guide–Addendum. European Environment Agency Technical Report 40, Copenhagen, 2000.
12. Boyce, M.S., Vernier, P.R., Nielsen, S.E., Schmiegelow, F.K.A., Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol. Modell. 157 (2002), 281–300, 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00200-4.
13. Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2 ed., 2002, Springer, Verlag, New York, NY, USA.
14. Cadotte, M.W., Dinnage, R., Tilman, D., Phylogenetic diversity promotes ecosystem stability. Ecology 93 (2012), 223–233, 10.1890/11-0426.1.
15. Carmona, C.P., Azcárate, F.M., de Bello, F., Ollero, H.S., Lepš, J., Peco, B., Taxonomical and functional diversity turnover in Mediterranean grasslands: interactions between grazing, habitat type and rainfall. J. Appl. Ecol. 49 (2012), 1084–1093, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02193.x.
16. Carpenter, S.R., Mooney, H.A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., Defries, R.S., Díaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A.K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H.M., Perrings, C., Reid, W.V., Sarukhan, J., Scholes, R.J., Whyte, A., Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (2009), 1305–1312, 10.1073/pnas.0808772106.
17. Casalegno, S., Inger, R., DeSilvey, C., Gaston, K.J., Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services. PLoS One 8 (2013), 6–10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0068437.
18. Chapin, F.S., Zavaleta, E.S., Eviner, V.T., Naylor, R.L., Vitousek, P.M., Reynolds, H.L., Hooper, D.U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O.E., Hobbie, S.E., Mack, M.C., Diaz, S., Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405 (2000), 234–242.
19. Cimon-Morin, J., Darveau, M., Poulin, M., Fostering synergies between ecosystem services and biodiversity in conservation planning: a review. Biol. Conserv. 166 (2013), 144–154, 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.023.
20. Cimon-Morin, J., Darveau, M., Poulin, M., Site complementarity between biodiversity and ecosystem services in conservation planning of sparsely-populated regions. Environ. Conserv., 1–13, 2015, 10.1017/s0376892915000132.
21. Crouzat, E., Mouchet, M., Turkelboom, F., Byczek, C., Meersmans, J., Berger, F., Verkerk, P.J., Lavorel, S., Assessing bundles of ecosystem services from regional to landscape scale: insights from the French Alps. J. Appl. Ecol. 52:5 (2015), 1145–1155, 10.1111/1365-2664.12502.
22. Cuervo, J.J., Møller, A.P., Temporal variation in population size of european bird species: effects of latitude and marginality of distribution. PLoS One, 8, 2013, e77654, 10.1371/journal.pone.0077654.
23. Cuervo, J.J., Møller, A.P., Colonial, more widely distributed and less abundant bird species undergo wider population fluctuations independent of their population trend. PLoS One, 12, 2017, e0173220, 10.1371/journal.pone.0173220.
24. Currie, W.S., Units of nature or processes across scales? The ecosystem concept at age 75. New Phytol. 190 (2011), 21–34, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03646.x.
25. Deliège, G., Neuteleers, S., Ecosystem services as an argument for biodiversity preservation: why its strength is its Problem–Reply to Cimon-Morin, et al. Biol. Conserv., 172, 2014, 218.
26. Devictor, V., Julliard, R., Couvet, D., Lee, A., Jiguet, F., Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities. Conserv. Biol. 21 (2007), 741–751, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00671.x.
27. Devictor, V., Julliard, R., Clavel, J., Jiguet, F., Lee, A., Couvet, D., Functional biotic homogenization of bird communities in disturbed landscapes. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17 (2008), 252–261, 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00364.x.
28. Devictor, V., Mouillot, D., Meynard, C.N., Jiguet, F., Thuiller, W., Mouquet, N., Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world. Ecol. Lett. 13 (2010), 1030–1040, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01493.x.
29. Dormann, C.F., McPherson, J.M., Araújo, M.B., Bivand, R., Bolliger, J., Carl, G., Davies, R.G., Hirzel, A.H., Jetz, W., Daniel Kissling, W., Kühn, I., Ohlemüller, R., Peres-Neto, P.R., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Schurr, F.M., Wilson, R., Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography (Cop.) 30 (2007), 609–628, 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x.
30. Doxa, A., Bas, Y., Paracchini, M.L., Pointereau, P., Terres, J.-M., Jiguet, F., Low-intensity agriculture increases farmland bird abundances in France. J. Appl. Ecol. 47 (2010), 1348–1356, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01869.x.
31. Duffy, J.E., Cardinale, B.J., France, K.E., McIntyre, P.B., Thébault, E., Loreau, M., The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. Ecol. Lett. 10 (2007), 522–538, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01037.x.
32. EDGE of Existence, 2015. www.edgeofexistence.org [WWW Document]. URL www.edgeofexistence.org.
33. ESRI, ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.1. 2012, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.
34. Edwards, D.P., Gilroy, J.J., Thomas, G.H., Uribe, C.A.M., Haugaasen, T., Land-sparing agriculture best protects avian phylogenetic diversity. Curr. Biol. 25 (2015), 2384–2391, 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.063.
35. Egoh, B., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Bode, M., Richardson, D.M., Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 142 (2009), 553–562, 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.11.009.
36. Eigenbrod, F., Anderson, B.J., Armsworth, P.R., Heinemeyer, A., Gillings, S., Roy, D.B., Thomas, C.D., Gaston, K.J., Representation of ecosystem services by tiered conservation strategies. Conserv. Lett. 3 (2010), 184–191, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00102.x.
37. Eppink, F.V., Popp, A., Land management and ecosystem services- how collaborative research programmes can support better policies. GAIA 21 (2012), 55–63.
38. Faith, D.P., Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61 (1992), 1–10, 10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3.
39. Faith, D.P., Quantifying biodiversity: a phylogenetic perspective. Conserv. Biol. 16 (2002), 248–252, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00503.x.
40. Faith, D.P., Threatened species and the potential loss of phylogenetic diversity: conservation scenarios based on estimated extinction probabilities and phylogenetic risk analysis. Conserv. Biol. 22 (2008), 1461–1470, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01068.x.
41. Felipe-Lucia, M.R., Comín, F.A., Ecosystem services-biodiversity relationships depend on land use type in floodplain agroecosystems. Land Use Policy 46 (2015), 201–210, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.003.
42. Fortin, M., Payette, S., How to test the significance of the relation between spatially autocorrelated data at the landscape scale: a case study using fire and forest maps. Ecoscience 9 (2002), 213–218, 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2009.00766.x.
43. Frankham, R., Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conserv. Biol. 10 (1996), 1500–1508, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10061500.x.
44. Frankham, R., Genetics and extinction. Biol. Conserv. 126 (2005), 131–140, 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.002.
45. Freudenberger, L., Hobson, P.R., Schluck, M., Ibisch, P.L., A global map of the functionality of terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Complex 12 (2012), 13–22.
46. Frishkoff, L.O., Karp, D.S., M'Gonigle, L.K., Mendenhall, C.D., Zook, J., Kremen, C., Hadly, E.A., Daily, G.C., Loss of avian phylogenetic diversity in neotropical agricultural systems. Science 345 (2014), 1343–1346, 10.7910/DVN/26910.
47. Gallaun, H., Zanchi, G., Nabuurs, G.J., Hengeveld, G., Schardt, M., Verkerk, P.J., EU-wide maps of growing stock and above-ground biomass in forests based on remote sensing and field measurements. For. Ecol. Manage. 260 (2010), 252–261, 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.011.
48. George, D., Mallery, M., 2002. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 11.0 Update, 4 ed. ed. Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
49. Gos, P., Lavorel, S., Stakeholders’ expectations on ecosystem services affect the assessment of ecosystem services hotspots and their congruence with biodiversity. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manage. 8 (2012), 93–106, 10.1080/21513732.2011.646303.
50. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003, 2013.
51. Haining, R., Spatial Data Analysis: Theory and Practice. 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
52. Hargis, C.D., Bissonette, J.A., David, J.L., The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landsc. Ecol. 13 (1998), 167–186.
53. Huang, J., Tichit, M., Poulot, M., Darly, S., Li, S., Petit, C., Aubry, C., Comparative review of multifunctionality and ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture. J. Environ. Manage. 149 (2015), 138–147, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.020.
54. Jax, K., Heink, U., Searching for the place of biodiversity in the ecosystem services discourse. Biol. Conserv. 191 (2015), 198–205, 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.032.
55. Jetz, W., Thomas, G.H., Joy, J.B., Redding, D.W., Hartmann, K., Mooers, A.Ø., Global distribution and conservation of evolutionary distinctness in birds. Curr. Biol. 24 (2014), 919–930, 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.011.
56. Jiguet, F., Devictor, V., Julliard, R., Couvet, D., French citizens monitoring ordinary birds provide tools for conservation and ecological sciences. Acta Oecol. 44 (2012), 58–66, 10.1016/j.actao.2011.05.003.
57. Julliard, R., Clavel, J., Devictor, V., Jiguet, F., Couvet, D., Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities. Ecol. Lett. 9 (2006), 1237–1244, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00977.x.
58. Labrière, N., Locatelli, B., Vieilledent, G., Kharisma, S., Basuki, I., Gond, V., Laumonier, Y., Spatial congruence between carbon and biodiversity across forest landscapes of northern Borneo. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 6 (2016), 105–120, 10.1016/j.gecco.2016.01.005.
59. Legendre, P., Gauthier, O., Statistical methods for temporal and space – time analysis of community composition data Statistical methods for temporal and space – time analysis of community composition data. Proc. R. Soc. London B – Biol. Sci., 281, 2014, 20132728.
60. Legendre, P., Legendre, L., Numerical Ecology. third ed., 2012, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
61. Legendre, P., Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm?. Ecology 74 (1993), 1659–1673.
62. Lindenmayer, D.B., Barton, P.S., Lane, P.W., Westgate, M.J., McBurney, L., Blair, D., Gibbons, P., Likens, G.E., An empirical assessment and comparison of species-based and habitat-based surrogates: a case study of forest vertebrates and large old trees. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e89807, 10.1371/journal.pone.0089807.
63. MEA, Ecosystems and Human Well Being – Biodiversity Synthesis. 2005.
64. Mace, G.M., Norris, K., Fitter, A.H., Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27 (2012), 19–25, 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006.
65. Maes, J., Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., A European assessment of the provision of ecosystem services: towards an atlas of ecosystem services. EUR – Sci. Tech. Res. Rep., 2011, 10.2788/63557 p. 81.
66. Magurran, A., Measuring Biological Diversity. 2004, Blackwell Science, Oxford; UK.
67. Manly, B.F.J., Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. third edition, 3rd. ed., 2006, Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, NY.
68. Mantel, N., The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27 (1967), 209–220.
69. McKinney, M.L., Lockwood, J.L., Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the nextmass extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 (1999), 450–453.
70. McKinney, M.L., Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol. Conserv. 127 (2006), 247–260, 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005.
71. Meyer, D., Dimitriadou, E., Hornik, K., Weingesse, A., Leisch, F., Chang, C.-C., Lin, C.-C., Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics, Probability Theory Group (Formerly: e1071). 2015, R package.
72. Meynard, C.N., Devictor, V., Mouillot, D., Thuiller, W., Jiguet, F., Mouquet, N., Beyond taxonomic diversity patterns: how do α, β and γ components of bird functional and phylogenetic diversity respond to environmental gradients across France?. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20 (2011), 893–903, 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00647.x.
73. Morelli, F., Benedetti, Y., Ibáñez-álamo, J.D., Jokimäki, J., Mänd, R., Tryjanowski, P., Møller, A.P., Evidence of evolutionary homogenization of bird communities in urban environments across Europe. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25:11 (2016), 1284–1293, 10.1111/geb.12486.
74. Morelli, F., Møller, A.P., Concerns about the use of ecosystem services as a tool for nature conservation: from misleading concepts to providing a price for nature, but not a value. Eur. J. Ecol. 1 (2015), 68–70, 10.1515/eje-2015-0009.
75. Morelli, F., Pruscini, F., Santolini, R., Perna, P., Benedetti, Y., Sisti, D., Landscape heterogeneity metrics as indicators of bird diversity: determining the optimal spatial scales in different landscapes. Ecol. Indic. 34 (2013), 372–379, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.05.021.
76. Mouchet, M.A., Villéger, S., Mason, N.W.H., Mouillot, D., Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Funct. Ecol. 24 (2010), 867–876, 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01695.x.
77. Mouchet, M.A., Lamarque, P., Martín-López, B., Crouzat, E., Gos, P., Byczek, C., Lavorel, S., An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Change 28 (2014), 298–308, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012.
78. Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Green, R.E., Lehner, B., Malcolm, T.R., Ricketts, T.H., Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (2008), 9495–9500, 10.1073/pnas.0707823105.
79. Oksanen, J., Guillaume Blanchet, F., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P.R., O'Hara, B.R., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H., Wagner, H., vegan: Community Ecology Package. 2016, R package version, 3–4.
80. Ord, J.K., Getis, A., Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geogr. Anal. 27 (1995), 286–306.
81. Paracchini, M.L., Pacini, C., Jones, M.L.M., Pérez-Soba, M., An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options. Ecol. Indic. 11 (2011), 71–80, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.04.006.
82. Pearman, P.B., Lavergne, S., Roquet, C., Wüest, R., Zimmermann, N.E., Thuiller, W., Phylogenetic patterns of climatic, habitat and trophic niches in a European avian assemblage. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23 (2014), 414–424, 10.1111/geb.12127.
83. Petchey, O.L., Gaston, K.J., Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol. Lett. 5 (2002), 402–411, 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00339.x.
84. Petchey, O.L., Gaston, K.J., Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol. Lett. 9 (2006), 741–758, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00924.x.
85. Princé, K., Lorrillière, R., Barbet-Massin, M., Jiguet, F., Predicting the fate of French bird communities under agriculture and climate change scenarios. Environ. Sci. Policy 33 (2013), 120–132, 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.04.009.
86. Qiu, J., Turner, M.G., Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (2013), 12149–12154, 10.1073/pnas.1310539110.
87. R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2017.
88. Rao, J.N.K., Scott, A.J., On Chi-squared Tests for multiway contigency tables with proportions estimated from survey data. Ann. Stat. 12 (1984), 46–60.
89. Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G.D., Bennett, E.M., Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107 (2010), 5242–5247, 10.1073/pnas.0907284107.
90. Redford, K.H., Adams, W.M., Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving Nature. Conserv. Biol. 23 (2009), 785–787, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01271.x.
91. Ricketts, T.H., Watson, K.B., Koh, I., Ellis, A.M., Nicholson, C.C., Posner, S., Richardson, L.L., Sonter, L.J., Disaggregating the evidence linking biodiversity and ecosystem services. Nat. Commun., 7, 2016, 13106, 10.1038/ncomms13106.
92. Rodríguez-Ortega, T., Oteros-Rozas, E., Ripoll-Bosch, R., Tichit, M., Martín-López, B., Bernués, A., Applying the ecosystem services framework to pasture-based livestock farming systems in Europe. Animal 8 (2014), 1361–1372, 10.1017/S1751731114000421.
93. Safi, K., Armour-Marshall, K., Baillie, J.E.M., Isaac, N.J.B., Global patterns of evolutionary distinct and globally endangered amphibians and mammals. PLoS One, 8, 2013, e63582, 10.1371/journal.pone.0063582.
94. Schindler, S., von Wehrden, H., Poirazidis, K., Wrbka, T., Kati, V., Multiscale performance of landscape metrics as indicators of species richness of plants, insects and vertebrates. Ecol. Indic. 31 (2013), 41–48, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.012.
95. Schröter, M., van der Zanden, E.H., van Oudenhoven, A.P.E., Remme, R.P., Serna-Chavez, H.M., de Groot, R.S., Opdam, P., Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-Arguments. Conserv. Lett. 7 (2014), 514–523, 10.1111/conl.12091.
96. Schulze, E.-D., Biodiversity and ecosystem function. springer science & business media, Berlin. Heidelberg, 1994, 10.1007/978-3-642-58001-7.
97. Seppelt, R., Dormann, C.F., Eppink, F.V., Lautenbach, S., Schmidt, S., A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol. 48 (2011), 630–636, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x.
98. Shannon, C.E., The mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27 (1948), 379–423.
99. Simpson, E.H., Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 1949, 688.
100. Sol, D., González-Lagos, C., Moreira, D., Maspons, J., Lapiedra, O., Urbanisation tolerance and the loss of avian diversity. Ecol. Lett. 17 (2014), 942–950, 10.1111/ele.12297.
101. Teillard, F., Allaire, G., Cahuzac, E., Léger, F., Maigné, E., Tichit, M., A novel method for mapping agricultural intensity reveals its spatial aggregation: implications for conservation policies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 149 (2012), 135–143, 10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.018.
102. Teillard, F., Jiguet, F., Tichit, M., The response of farmland bird communities to agricultural intensity as influenced by its spatial aggregation. PLoS One, 10, 2015, e0119674, 10.1371/journal.pone.0119674.
103. Thuiller, W., Lavergne, S., Roquet, C., Boulangeat, I., Lafourcade, B., Araújo, M.B., Consequences of climate change on the tree of life in Europe. Nature 470 (2011), 531–534, 10.1038/nature09705.
104. Tilman, D., Isbell, F., Cowles, J.M., Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45 (2014), 471–493, 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091917.
105. Tryjanowski, P., Hartel, T., Báldi, A., Szymański, P., Tobółka, M., Herzon, I., Goławski, A., Konvička, M., Hromada, M., Jerzak, L., Kujawa, K., Lenda, M., Orłowski, G., Panek, M., Skórka, P., Sparks, T.H., Tworek, S., Wuczyński, A., Żmihorski, M., Conservation of farmland birds faces different challenges in Western and Central-Eastern Europe. Acta Ornithol. 46 (2011), 1–12, 10.3161/000164511x589857.
106. Tucker, 2016 Tucker, C.M., Cadotte, M.W., Carvalho, S.B., Davies, T.J., Ferrier, S., Fritz, S.A., Grenyer, R., Helmus, M.R., Jin, L.S., Ø. Mooers, A., Pavoine, S., Purschke, O., Redding, D.W., Rosauer, D.F., Winter, M., Mazel, F., et al. A guide to phylogenetic metrics for conservation, community ecology and macroecology. Biol. Rev. 92:2 (2016), 698–715, 10.1111/brv.12252.
107. Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J., Williams, P.H., What to protect?—systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55 (1991), 235–254, 10.1016/0006-3207(91)90030-D.
108. Wang, F., Quantitative Methods and Socio-Economic Applications in GIS. 2nd ed., 2014, CRC Press.
109. Winter, M., Devictor, V., Schweiger, O., Phylogenetic diversity and nature conservation: where are we?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28 (2013), 199–204, 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.015.
110. Zupan, L., Cabeza, M., Maiorano, L., Roquet, C., Devictor, V., Lavergne, S., Mouillot, D., Mouquet, N., Renaud, J., Thuiller, W., Spatial mismatch of phylogenetic diversity across three vertebrate groups and protected areas in Europe. Divers. Distrib. 20 (2014), 674–685, 10.1111/ddi.12186.