An experience: A small software company attempting to improve its process

Proceedings - Software Technology and Engineering Practice, STEP 1999

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 153-160

  Otoya, Sergio ^a   Cerpa, Narciso ^b  

^a Winapp Pty Ltd   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

CAPABILITY MATURITY MODEL FOR SOFTWARES; PERCEIVED QUALITY; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; SMALL ORGANIZATIONS; SMALL SOFTWARE COMPANIES; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; SOFTWARE PROJECT; TEAM PERFORMANCE;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 85025704807     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/STEP.1999.798788     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., and Weber, C. V., 1993. Capability Maturity Model For Software, Version 1.1. Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute.
2. Brodman, J. G., and Johnson, D. I., 1996. Return on investement from software process improvement as measured by U.S. industry. Crosstalk, 9(4).
3. Johnson, D. I., and Brodman, J. G., 1996. Realities and rewards of software process improvement. IEEE Software, 29(11):99-101.
4. Bilotta, J. G., and McGrew, J. F., 1998. A Guttman Scaling of CMM Level 2 Practices: Investigating the Implementation Sequences Underlying Software Engineering Maturity. Empirical Software Engineering, 3:159-177.
5. Brodman, J. G., and Johnson, D. I., 1994. What Small Business and Small Organizations Say About the CMM. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, Sorrento Italy.
6. Johnson, D. I., and Brodman, J. G., 1997. Tailoring the CMM for small business, small organisations, and small projects. Software Process Newsletter, 8: 1-6.