Toward a sustainable and secure water future: A leadership role for the U.S. geological survey

Toward a Sustainable and Secure Water Future: A Leadership Role for the U.S. Geological Survey

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-114

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85024098828     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.17226/12672     Document Type: Book

References (88)

1. Advisory Committee on Water Information (ACWI). 2004. External Task Force Review of the United States Geological Survey Federal-State Cooperative Water Program. Available online at http://acwi.gov/coop2004/Coop TFRpt.pdf.
2. Alexander, R. B., R. A. Smith, G. E. Schwartz, E. W. Boyer, J. V. Nolan, and J. W. Brakebill. 2008. Differences in Phosphorus and Nitrogen Delivery to The Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin. Environmental Science and Technology 42(3):822-830.
3. Altenburger, R., H. Walter, and M. Grote. 2004. What contributes to the combined effect of a complex chemical mixture? Environmental Science and Technology 38(23): 6353-6362.
4. American Society of Civil Engineers. 2009. 2009 Report Card for American Infrastructure. http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org.
5. Bates, B. C., Z. W. Kundzewicz, S. Wu, and J. P. Palutikof, eds. 2008. Climate Change and Water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva. 210 pp.
6. Bazerman, M. H., and M. D. Watkins. 2004. Predictable Surprises: The Disasters You Should Have Seen Coming, and How to Prevent Them. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. 316 pp.
7. Boesch, D. F. 2002. Challenges and opportunities for science in reducing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal systems. Estuaries 25: 744-758.
8. Brian, J. P., C. A. Harris, M. Scholze, T. Backhaus, P. Booy, M. Lamoree, G. Pojana, N, Jonkers, T. Runnalls, A. Bonfá, A. Marcomini, and J. P. Sumpter. 2005. Accurate prediction of the response of freshwater fish to a mixture of estrogenic chemicals. Environmental Health Persepctives 113(6): 721-728.
9. California Energy Commission. 2005. California's Water-Energy Relationship. Final staff report. CEC-700-2005-011-SF. Available online at www.fypower.org/pdf/CEC_Water-Energy(Nov.2005).pdf.
10. Capel, P. D., K. A. McCarthy, and J. E. Barbash. 2008. National, holistic, watershed-scale approach to understand the sources, transport and fate of agricultural chemicals. Journal of Environmental Quality 37: 983-993.
11. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP). 2008. The effects of climate change on agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity. A Report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 362 pp.
12. Coles, J. F., T. F. Cuffney, G. McMahon, and K. M. Beaulieu. 2004. The effects of urbanization on the biological, physical, and chemical characteristics of coastal New England streams: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1695. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.
13. Constantz, J., K. S. Adams, and D. A. Stonestrom. 2007. Overview of groundwater recharge study sites. Pp. 61-82 in Ground-Water in the Arid and Semiarid Southwestern United States. D. A. Stonestrom, J. Constantz, T. P. A. Ferre, and S. A. Leake, eds. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1703. Menlo Park, CA: U.S. Geological Survey.
14. Cox, M. H., G. W. Su, and J. Constantz. 2007. Heat, chloride, and specific conductance as ground water tracers near streams. Ground Water 45: 187-195.
15. Diaz, R. J., and R. Rosenberg. 1995. Marine benthic hypoxia: A review of its ecological effects and the behavioral responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 33: 245-303.
16. Environmental Benchmarker and Strategist. 2007. The State of the Water Industry, Winter 2007.
17. Focazio, M. J., D. W. Kolpin, K. K. Barnes, E. T. Furlong, M. T. Meyer, S. D. Zaugg, L. B. Barber, and E. M. Thurman. 2008. A national reconnaissance for pharmaceuticals and other organic wastewater contaminants in the United States: II Untreated drinking water sources. Science of the Total Environment 402: 201-216.
18. Flint, L. E., and A. L. Flint. 2007. Regional analysis of ground-water recharge. Pp. 29-60 in Ground-Water in the Arid and Semiarid Southwestern United States. D. A. Stonestrom, J. Constantz, T. P. A. Ferre, and S. A. Leake, eds. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1703. Menlo Park, CA: U.S. Geological Survey.
19. Freas, K., R. Bailey, A. Munevar, and S. Butler. 2008. Incorporating climate change in water planning. Journal AWWA 100 (6): 92-99.
20. Gallup Earth Day Poll. 2007. Available online at http://www.galluppoll.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1615&pg=2.
21. Global Water Research Coalition. 2004. Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Water Cycle; An International Review. Kiwa Water Research and Stowa (Netherlands) and Global Water Research Coalition, United Kingdom.
22. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2003. Freshwater Supply: States' Views of How Federal Agencies Could Help Meet Challenges of Expected Shortages. Report to Congressional Requesters GAO-03-514. Washington, D.C.: Government Accountability Office.
23. Green, C.T., L. H. Fisher, and B. A. Bekins. 2008. Nitrogen fluxes through unsaturated zones in five agricultural settings across the United States. J Environ Qual. 37: 1073-1085.
24. Groves, D. G., J. Griffin, and S. Hajiamiri. 2008. Estimating the Value of Water-Use Efficiency in the Intermountain West. RAND Corporation technical report series. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
25. Harbaugh, A. W., E. R. Banta, M. C. Hill, and M. G. McDonald. 2000a. MODFLOW-2000, The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-water Model-User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-92. 121 p.
26. Harbaugh, A. W., E. R. Banta, M. C. Hill, and M. G. McDonald. 2000b. MODFLOW-2000, The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-water Model-User Guide to Observation, Sensitivity, and Parameter-Estimation Processes and Three Post-Processing Programs. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-184. 209 p.
27. Heinz Center. 2003. Dam Removal Research: Status and Prospects. W. L. Graf, ed. Washington, D.C.: Heinz Center.
28. Heinz Center. 2008. The State of The Nation's Ecosystems; Measuring the Lands, Waters, and Living Resources of the United States. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
29. Hutson, S. S., N. L. Barber, J. F. Kenny, K. S. Linsey, D. S. Lumia, and M. A. Maupin. 2004. Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2000. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1268. Washington, D.C., USGS.
30. Job, C. 2008. EPA's Sustainable Infrastructure Initiative. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 28 (1): 42-43. (See also EPA's Sustainable Infrastructure Initiative at www.epa.gov/water/infrastructure/.)
31. Kolpin, D. W., E. T. Furlong, M. T. Meyer, E. M. Thurman, S. D. Zaugg, L. B. Barber, and H. T. Buxton. 2002. Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000-A national reconnaissance. Environmental Science and Technology 36(6): 1202-1211.
32. Lanfear, K. J. 2005. A Near-optimum Procedure for Selecting Stations in a Streamgaging Network. Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5001. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.
33. Leake, S. A., D. R. Pool, and J. M. Leenhouts. 2008. Simulated effects of groundwater withdrawals and artificial recharge on discharge to streams, springs, and riparian vegetation in the Sierra Vista Subwatershed of the Upper San Pedro Basin, Southeastern Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008-5207. 14 p.
34. McKenzie, J. M., D. I. Siegel, D. O. Rosenberry, P. H. Glaser, and C. I. Voss. 2007. Heat transport in the Red Lake Bog, glacial Lake Agassiz peatlands. Hydrological Processes 21: 369-378.
35. Mehan, G. T. III. 2009. Water's Worth: Our cup runneth dry. The Environ Forum. Environ Law Inst 26(2): 26-31.
36. Milly, P. C. D., J. Betancourt, M. Falkenmark, R. M. Hirsch, Z. W. Kundzewicz, D. P. Lettenmaier, and R. J. Stouffer. 2008. Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science 319: 573-574.
37. Moss, M. E. 1982. Concepts and techniques in hydrological network design. Operational Hydrology Report No. 19, WMO Report No. 580. Geneva, Swit zerland: World Meteorological Organization. 30 p.
38. Moss, M. E., and G. D. Tasker. 1991. An intercomparison of hydrological network-design technologies. Hydrological Sciences Journal 36(3): 209-221.
39. Moran, M. 2007. Occurrence of methyl tert-butyl ether and other fuel oxygenates in source water and drinking water of the United States. Environ. Chem. 5(part R): 57-73.
40. National Drought Mitigation Center. 2008. United States Drought Monitor/ University of Nebraska, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Accessed June 2008. Available online at http://drought.unl.edu/ dm/monitor.html.
41. National Hydrologic Warning Council (NHWC). 2006. Benefits of USGS Streamgaging Program; Users and Uses of Streamflow Data. Denver, CO. Available online at http://hydrologicwarning.org/content.aspx?page_id=86& club_id=617218.
42. National Research Council (NRC). 2001a. Envisioning the Agenda for Water Resources Research in the Twenty-first Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
43. National Research Council (NRC). 2001b. Future Roles and Opportunities for the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
44. National Research Council (NRC). 2002a. Estimating Water Use in the United States: A new Paradigm for the National Water-Use Information Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
45. National Research Council (NRC). 2002b. Opportunities to Improve the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Assessment Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
46. National Research Council (NRC). 2003. Water Use Science: Improving The Water Use Program of the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
47. National Research Council (NRC). 2004a. Assessing the National Streamflow Information System. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
48. National Research Council (NRC). 2004b. Confronting the Nation's Water Problems: The Role of Research. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
49. National Research Council (NRC). 2006. Progress Toward Restoring the Ever-glades: The First Biennial Review. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
50. National Research Council (NRC). 2007. River Science at the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
51. National Research Council (NRC). 2008a. Desalinization: A National Perspective. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
52. National Research Council (NRC). 2008b. Water Implications of Biofuels Production in the United States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
53. National Research Council (NRC). 2008c. Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
54. National Research Council (NRC). 2008d. Mississippi River Water Quality and the Clean Water Act: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
55. National Research Council (NRC). 2009. Informing Decisions in a changing Climate. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
56. National Science and Technology Council (NSTC). 2007. A Strategy for Federal Science and Technology to Support Water Availability and Quality in the United States. Report of the Subcommittee on Water Availability and Quality of the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources. Washington, D.C.
57. Nolan, B. T., K. J. Hitt, and B. C. Ruddy. 2002. Probability of nitrate contamination of recently recharged groundwaters in the conterminous United States. Environ. Sci. and Tech. 36(10): 2138-2145.
58. NUS Consulting Group. 2008. Rising prices reflect increasing awareness of global water shortages. World Water and Environmental Engineering, January/February. Park Ridge, NJ: NUS Consulting Group. Available online at http://www.nusconsulting.com/.
59. Palmer, M. A., and J. D. Allan. 2006. Restoring Rivers: The work has begun, but we have yet to determine what works best. Issues in Science and Technology 22: 40-48.
60. Pate, R., M. Hightower, C. Cameron, and W. Einfeld. 2007. Overview of Energy-Water Interdependencies And The Emerging Energy Demands On Water Resources. Report SAND 2007-1349C. Los Alamos, NM: Sandia National Laboratories. Pg. 67 in 12th Annual Water Conservation and Xeriscape Conference Notebook. Albuquerque, NM: Xeriscape Council of New Mexico, Inc.
61. Power, M. 2008. Peak Water: Aquifers and Rivers are Running Dry. How Three Regions Are Coping. Wired Magazine 16.05. Accessed online at http://www.wired.com/science/planetearth/magazine/16-05/ff_peakwater, July 14, 2008.
62. Puckett, L. J., C. Zamora, H. Essaid, J. T. Wilson, H. M. Johnson, M. J. Brayton, and J. R. Vogel. 2008. Transport and fate of nitrate at the ground-water/-surface water interface. J Environ Qual. 37: 1034-1050.
63. Reilly, T. E., K .F. Dennehy, W. A. Alley, and W. L. Cunnigham. 2008. Ground-Water Availability in the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1323. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.
64. Schwarzenbach, R. P., B. I. Escher, K. Fenner, T. B. Hofstetter, C. A.Johnson, U. von Gunten, and B. Wehrli. 2006. The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems. Science. 313: 1072-1077.
65. U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Interim Projections by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 2000-2050. Available online at http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj/.
66. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2007. Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: An Update by the EPA Science Advisory Board. EPA-SAB-08-003. Washington, D.C.: EPA Science Advisory Board.
67. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2008a. Contaminant Candidate List. Accessed 2008. Available online at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ccl /index.html.
68. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2008b. National Summary of Impaired Waters and TMDL Information. Available online at ttp://iaspub.epa.gov/waters10/attains_nation_cy.control?p_report_type=T#imp_water_by_state.
69. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2008c. Investing in a Sustainable Future; 2007 Report of the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund. EPA-816-R-08-002. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water.
70. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2008d. EPA's 2008 Report on the Environment. EPA/600/R-07/045F. Washington, D.C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Center for Environmental Assessment.
71. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2009. Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey and Assessment; Fourth Report to Congress. EPA 816-R-09-001. Washington, D.C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water.
72. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 1999a. External Task Force Review of the United States Geological Survey Federal-State Cooperative Water Program. Circular 1192. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.
73. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 1999b. Strategic Directions for the Water Resources Division, 1998-2008. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-249. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey.
74. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2002. Ground-water Resources of the Middle Rio Grande Basin. Circular 1222. Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2002/circ1222/.
75. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2004. External Task Force Review of the United States Geological Survey Federal-State Cooperative Water Program. Available online at http://acwi.gov/coop2004/CoopTFRpt.pdf.
76. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2006a. Probing the Los Angeles Basin-Insights Into Ground-Water Resources and Earthquake Hazards. Fact Sheet 086-02. Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2002/fs086-02.
77. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2006b. The quality of our Nation's waters-Volatile organic compounds in the Nation's ground water and drinking-water supply wells. Circular 1292. 101 p.
78. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2006c. The quality of our Nation's waters-Pesticides in the Nation's streams and ground water, 1992-2001. Circular 1291. 172 p.
79. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2007a. Facing tomorrow's challenges-U.S. Geological Survey Science in the Decade 2007-2017. Circular 1309. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.
80. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2007b. Forecasting the Range-wide Status of Polar Bears at Selected Times in the 21st Century. Administrative Report. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.
81. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2008. Adapted from Differences in Phosphorus and Nitrogen Delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin. Available online at http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/sparrow/gulf_findings/hypoxia.html.
82. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2009. Climate change and water resources management: a federal perspective. Circular 1331, 65 p.
83. U.S. News and World Report. 2007. Front cover, June 4th, 2007.
84. United National Environmental Programme (UNEP). 2006. State of the Marine Environment. The Hauge.
85. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available online at ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt.
86. Wallis, M. J., M. R. Ambrose, and C. C. Chan. 2008. Climate change: Charting a water course in an uncertain future. Journal AWWA 100(6): 70-79.
87. Winter, T. C., J. W. Harvey, O.L. Franke, and W. M. Alley. 1998. Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resources. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1139. Denver, CO: U.S. Geological Survey.
88. World Economic Forum. 2009. The bubble is close to bursting: a forecast of the main economic and geopolitical water issues likely to arise in the world during the next two decades. Published online at www.weforum.org.