Tourist evaluation of olu deniz beach (turkey) using contingent valuation and travel cost approaches

World Leisure Journal

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 48-55

  Blakemore, F Brian ^a   Ozhan, Erdal ^b   Williams, Allan T ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

^b MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c BATH SPA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d Air Terra Water Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Beach; Consumer Surplus; Contingent Valuation; Travel Cost; Turkey; Willingness To Pay

Indexed keywords

EID: 85024036377     PISSN: 16078055     EISSN: 23334509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/04419057.2000.9674208     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alvorez-Fario, B., Hanley N. and Wright R. 1996. Sample selection bias and the estimation of bid curves in open-ended contingent valuation studies. Ecological Economics No 96/5, Department of Economics, University of Sterling.
2. Anon, 1999. Bulletin of Tourism Statistics. Ankara. Ministry of Tourism.: pp 84.
3. Bell, F.W & Leeworthy, V.R 1986. An economic analysis of the importance of saltwater beaches in Florida. Dept of Economics, Report 82. Florida State University, Tallahasse.
4. Blakemore, F. B. & Williams, A.T. 1998. Public valuation of beaches in south east Wales, UK. Shore and Beach 66(4), October: 18-23.
5. Brown Jr., G. 1993. The viewing value of elephants. Economics and ecology, ed. Barbier, E.B. pp 146-55. London. Chapman & Hall.
6. Cooper, J.C 1994.A Comparison of Approaches to calculating confidence intervals for benefit measures from dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys, Land Economics 70(1), February: 111-122.
7. Eklof, J. and Karlsson, S. 1997. Testing and correcting for sample selection bias in discrete choice contingent valuation studies. Working paper in economics and finance, No 171, Stockholm School of Economics, May
8. Hinde, S. 1998. Who earns what in nineties Britain. The Express. October 7th. London.
9. Hoehn, J. R and Randall, A 1987. A Satisfactory Benefit Cost Indicator from Contingent Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management. 14:226-47.
10. Knetsch, J.L. 1993. Environmental Evaluation: Some practical problems of wrong questions and misleading answers. Resource Assessment Commission. Occasional paper No.5: 26 pp, Australian Government Service.
11. Loomis, J.B., Peterson, G., & SORG, C. 1985. Afield guide to wildlife economic analysis. Transactions of the American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference. 49:315-24.
12. Mitchell, R. C. & Carson, R.T. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the future, 295 pp.
13. Morgan, R., B Bursalioglu., L Hapoglu-Balas., T.C. Jones, E Ozhan, & A T Williams, 1995.
14. Beach user opinions and beach ratings: A pilot study on the Turkish Aegean Coast. Proceedings of the second international conference on the Mediterranean coastal environment.ed. E Ozhan: 273-83. Tarragona. Spain. MEDCOAST, METU, Ankara, Turkey
15. Morgan, R & Williams, A.T., 1998. Beach Ratings-what are they worth? Current Quality, edition 2. Jan., 2. Copenhagen WHO Regional office Europe.
16. Ozhan, E. 1996. Coastal Zone Management in Turkey. Ocean and Coastal Management. Special MEDCOAST issue. 30(2-3): 153-76.
17. Pearce, D., Markandya, A. & Barbier, E.B. 1989. Blueprint for a Green Economy. London Earthscan: 34-87.
18. Randall, A. 1993. Passive use and values and contingent valuation valid for damage assessment. Choices. 212-15.
19. Stoll, J. R. 1983. Recreational activities and non market valuation: the conceptualisation issue. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics. 15(3): 119-25.
20. Stevens, T.H., Echeverria, J., Glass, R.J., Hager, T & More, T.A. 1991. Measuring the Existence Value of Wildlife: What do CVM Estimates Really Show. Land Economics. 67: 390-400.
21. Thayer, M. A. 1981. Contingent Valuation techniques for assessing environmental impacts; further evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 8: 27-44.
22. Turner, R.K. Ed. 1993. Sustainable Environmental Economics and Management. London: Belhaven Press: 27-28.
23. Unal, O and Williams, A.T, 1999. Beach visits and the willingness to pay: Cesme Peninsula, Turkey, in Proceedings of the MEDCOAST 99-EMECS 99 Joint Conference: Land Ocean Interactions-Managing coastal ecosystems. ed. E Ozhan, pp 1149-62. MEDCOAST. Middle East Technical University. Ankara, Turkey.
24. US Environmental Protection Agency. 1983. Guidelines for Performing Regulatory Impact Analysis. 205 pp.
25. Williams, A.T & Sothem, E.J. 1986. Recreational Pressure on the Glamorgan Heritage Coast, South Wales, United Kingdom. Shore and Beach. 30-37.
26. Williams, A.T., Morgan, R.M., Ozhan, E & A Ergin (2000). An investigation of beach aesthetics for the Antalya to Izmir coastline of Turkey. Littoral 2000.