The effect of course rigor on preservice teachers’ course and instructor evaluation

Computers in the Schools

Volumn 14, Issue 3-4, 1999, Pages 13-23

  Overbaugh, Richard C ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023958600     PISSN: 07380569     EISSN: 15287033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J025v14n03_03     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Arreola, R. A., 1983. Students can distinguish between personality and content/organization in rating teachers. Phi Delta Kappaii, 65:222–23.
2. Carey, G. W., 1993. Thoughts on the lesser evil:Student evaluations. Perspective on Political Science, 22(1):17–20.
3. Cashin, W. E., 1995. Student ratings of teaching:The research revisited, Manhattan, KS:Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development. (IDEA Paper No. 32)
4. Feldman, K. A., 1983. Seniority and experience of college teachers as related to evaluations they receive from students. Research in Higher Education, 21:3–124.
5. Hunter, B., 1985. Problem solving with databases. The Computing Teacher, 13:20–27.
6. Kemp, B. W., and Kumar, G. S., 1990. Student evaluations:Are we using them correctly?. Journal of Educution for Business, 66(2):106–111.
7. Lockard, J., Abrams, P. D., and Many, W. A., 1994. Microcomputers for twenty-first century educators, 3rd ed., New York:Harper Collins.
8. Marsh, H. W., and Hocevar, D., 1991. Students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness:The stability of mean ratings of the same teachers over a 13-year period. Teaching ?. Teacher Education, 7:303–314.
9. McConnell, C. R., and Sosin, K., 1984. Some determinants of student attitudes toward large classes. Journal of Economic Education, 15(3):181–190.
10. Seldin, P., 1993. The use and abuse of student ratings of professors. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 34(46):A40
11. Zoller, U., 1992. Faculty teaching performance evaluation in higher science education:Issues and implications (a “cross-cultural” case study). Science Education, 76(6):673–684.