The effectiveness of training clinical supervisors in conducting the supervisory conference

Clinical Supervisor

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 55-78

  Barrow, Meryl ^a   Domingo, Robert A ^a  

^a LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023920410     PISSN: 07325223     EISSN: 1545231X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J001v16n01_04     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 1985. Clinical supervision in speech-language pathology and audiology. ASHA, 27:57–60.
2. Anderson, J., 1981. Training of supervisors in speech-language pathology and audiology. ASHA, 23:77–82.
3. Anderson, J., 1988. The supervisory process in speech-language pathology and audiology, Boston:College Hill Publication.
4. Anderson, J., 1990. “Planning, executing and analyzing supervisory conferences”. In Clinical supervision across settings:Communication and collaboration, Edited by:Brasseur, J., Larkins, P., and Smith, K., 63–72. Rockville:American Speech, Language and Hearing Association.
5. Brasseur, J., 1980. Observed differences between direct, indirect and direct/indirect videotaped conferences (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41
6. Brasseur, J., 1987. “Preparation of supervisees for the supervisory process”. In Clinical supervision:A coming of age, Edited by:Farmer, S., 144–163. Las Cruces:New Mexico State University.
7. Brasseur, J., 1989. The supervisory process:A continuum perspective. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 20:274–295.
8. Brasseur, J., and Anderson, J., 1983. Observed differences between direct, indirect and direct/indirect videotaped supervisory conferences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26:345–356.
9. Caracciolo, G., Rigrodsky, S., and Morrison, E., 1978a. A Rogerian orientation to the speech-language pathology supervisory relationshi. ASHA, 20:286–290.
10. Caracciolo, G., Rigrodsky, S., and Morrison, E., 1978b. Perceived interpersonal conditions and professional growth of master's level speech-language pathology students during the supervisory process. ASHA, 20:467–477.
11. Cogan, M., 1973. Clinical supervision, Boston:Houghton-Mifflin Co.
12. Culatta, R., and Seltzer, H., 1976. Content and sequence analysis of the supervisory session. ASHA, 18:8–12.
13. Doehring, D., 1987. “Research on human communication disorders supervision”. In Supervision in human communication disorders, Edited by:Crago, M., and Pickering, M., 81–107. Boston:College Hill Press.
14. Donnelly, C., and Glaser, A., 1989. “The effects of training on self-supervision”. In Supervision:Innovations, Edited by:Shapiro, D., 141–145. Cullowhee:Western Carolina University.
15. Dowling, S., 1985. Typical, ideal conferences:Perceptions as a function of training. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Speech, Language and Hearing Association. November1985, Washington, DC.
16. Dowling, S., 1992. Implementing the supervisory process:Theory and practice, Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall Inc.
17. Dowling, S., 1995. Conference question usage:Impact of supervisory training. The Supervisors' Forum, 2:12–14.
18. Dowling, S., and Biskynis, R., 1993. Effects of supervisory training and a practicum:A case study. The Supervisors' Forum, 1:9–12.
19. Dowling, S., and Wittkopp, J., 1982. Students' perceived supervisory needs. Journal of Communication Disorders, 15:319–328.
20. Farmer, S., 1986. Verbal and non-verbal interpersonal communication pacing:A facilitation program. SUPERvision, 10:16–25.
21. Farmer, S., and Farmer, J., 1989. Supervision in communication disorders, Columbus:Merrill Publishing Company.
22. Ghitter, R., 1987. “Relationship of interpersonal and background variables to supervisee clinical effectiveness”. In Clinical supervision:A coming of age, Edited by:Farmer, S., 49–56. Las Cruces:New Mexico State University.
23. Goldhammer, R., 1969. Clinical supervision, New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.
24. Kennedy, K., 1981. The effect of two methods of supervision preconference written feedback on the verbal behaviors of participants in individual speech-pathology supervision conferences (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42(5)
25. Nilsen, J., 1983. Supervisors use of direct/indirect verbal conference style and alteration of clinician behavior (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43(12)
26. Oratio, A., 1977. Supervision in speech pathology-A handbook for supervisors and clinicians, Baltimore:University Park Press.
27. Pickering, M., 1987. “Supervision:A person-focused process”. In Supervision in human communication disorders, Edited by:Crago, M., and Pickering, M., 107–134. Boston:College Hill Press.
28. Shapiro, D., 1985. Clinical supervision:A process in progress. National Student Speech, Language, Hearing Association Journal, 13:89–108.
29. Shapiro, D., and Anderson, J., 1988. An analysis of commitment made by student clinicians in speech-language pathology and audiology. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53:202–210.
30. Smith, K., and Anderson, J., 1982a. Development and validation of an individual supervisory conference rating scale for use in speech-language pathology. Journal of Speech Hearing Research, 25:243–251.
31. Smith, K., and Anderson, J., 1982b. Relationship of perceived effectiveness to verbal interaction/content variables in supervisory conferences in speech-language pathology. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25:252–261.
32. Ulrich, S., 1987a. Clinical supervision in speech, language pathology and audiology. Paper presented at the meeting of the New York State Speech, Language and Hearing Association. April1987a, Kiamesha Lake, New York.
33. Ulrich, S., 1987b. “A developing specialty”. In Supervision in human communication disorders, Edited by:Crago, M., and Pickering, M., 3–30. Boston:College Hill Press.
34. Victor, S., 1995. The impact of supervisory training on ASHA's 13 supervision competencies. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech, Language and Hearing Association. December1995, Orlando, Florida.